(Fred Reed is author of Nekkid in Austin: Drop Your
Inner Child Down a Well, A Brass Pole in Bangkok: A
Thing I Aspire to Be, Curmudgeing Through Paradise:
Reports from a Fractal Dung Beetle, Au Phuc Dup and Nowhere to Go:
The Only Really True Book About VietNam, and A Grand Adventure: Wisdom's
Price-Along with Bits and Pieces about Mexico. Visit his blog.)
I am a reasonably retired mid-level journalist of no
import but much experience, interested in international affairs, law,
society, education, and political trends. Yet, God’s truth, I do not know who
Boehner and Pelosi are, or were, and now somebody or something called Ryan.
Yes, I know that they are in Congress, or were, but I do not know what posts
they hold, or held, or in which party they are, or were, or in which house. I
really do not.
How can this be? How can someone who has spent a lifetime in the
fetid bubblings of the news racket, including many years in DC, be so
profoundly ignorant of the most elementary of political facts? Isn’t that like
a neurosurgeon who can’t find the brain?
No.
It’s simple. Congress seems to me to be of so little importance
as not to merit attention. I mean this seriously. I cannot see that it matters
who is on what committee or speaker of whatever or, for that matter, who wins
the presidential election (unless Trump) or who is on the Supreme Court. I
think I can name two of the stiffs on the Court.
Consider: The crucial issues facing the country are the
endless wars, racial hostility, immigration, affirmative action, federal
surveillance, uncontrolled looting and burning, the deterioration of the
universities, wildly excessive military spending, the abandonment of the
Constitution, the conversion of the schools into indoctrination camps, the
federal practice of torture, and the enforcement of political correctness
by the federal government, academia, and the media.
What is the relevance of Congress to these? Is it possible to
imagine the alleged legislators (allegislators?) actually doing anything
about any of them? If they were going to, they would have.
When is the last time Congress did anything that mattered?
Obamacare, perhaps, when they replaced a wretched form of health
care with a wretched form of health care.
For that matter, why does it matter who wins the presidential
election? With the exception of Trump, none would even try to deal with the
things that matter to me. They all promise More of the Same. All are
politically correct. They all represent a self-interested clique of parasites.
The Supreme Court? The Nine Cadavers could have found torture
unconstitutional, or affirmative action, or undeclared wars. Nothing. They
serve only to certify the status quo. What do they do all day? Sleep in their
coffins, I suppose, and come out at night to flap around the Capitol.
In high school, we learned that the government
consisted of three branches, the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial.
This was at least sometimes accurate, intermittently, a little. Times have
changed. The actual branches are more like the President, Israel, the
corporations, Wall Street, the media, and the federal bureaucracies.
There is in this arrangement considerable
overlap and much interlocking of directorates. Personnel go back and forth
between Treasury and Wall Street, and corporate donors buy the President.
Israel, the Pentagon, and the arms makers are as complexly tied together as
copulating octopi. Or octopuses. (Or maybe octopodes.) All of them regard the United
States as ticks regard cows.
In its beautiful design, democracy serves to keep the population
from meddling in policy. If the politically correct want children to be
taught that Sojourner Truth was more important than George Washington, a committee
nobody has heard of in New York mandates the text book and the Department
of Education requires its use by regulation. No politician is responsible,
and infuriated parents in Kansas have no recourse. How do you remonstrate with
an anonymous bureaucracy? What is its phone number?
If the president wants to
outlaw cultural symbolism—forbidding employees of the Veterans
Administration to say “Merry Christmas,” for example—he just does it. (And
did.) The Supreme Court, sloshing somnolently in its embalming fluid, will
ignore the matter or affirm that the Constitution says whatever the President
says. What earthly point is there in paying them attention? To do so
establishes one as being in the last stages of naiveté.
Which, incidentally, is the
attitude of citizenries of other Third World countries.
Along with Congress and the Supreme Dead and other such abandoned
houses, I put Big Journalism. Encapsulated in a curious bubble of
isolation, it serves chiefly to to produce a narcotic droning. The first rule
of BJ—that’s “Big Journalism”—is to choose a point on the Left-Right continuum
(it doesn’t matter what point) and never, ever deviate from it. This rule,
rigidly followed, makes unnecessary the reading of their output. They could be
done in software. Name a subject and you know without further investigation the
views of any given talking head. Why listen to them?
If anyone comes along who doesn’t fit, either news weasel or pol,
they want to disappear him.Thus we see the Republicans, desperate to find
a candidate that Hillary can beat, chattering at each other, “Is Trump
Really a Conservative?” Not “Does what he says make sense?” The underlying
question of course is “How can we get rid of this guy that the constituency
wants but who isn’t a member of the tree house?”
They all seem to spend their time talking to each other about each
other. They remind me of ingrown toe-nails. I think of this as the National
Review Two-Step, though it is industry-wide. (Journalism is an industry: Ay, there’s the rub.) Thus the
endless stories, “Leibniz on Atkins,” “Tugwurtle’s Response to Michael Moore on
Coulter.”
When I go to political sites like, say, Breitbart.com, I find dozens
of talking herds, almost none of who have I heard of. They seem fascinated with
each other. None ever says anything that provokes thought. They are like birds
perched on their chosen points on the political x-axis, singing the song
appropriate to that point. (Maybe you didn’t know that birds could perch on
axes. Well, they can.) I suspect that they all live in a
sealed cage in New York, connected to each other by wires. I am sick of
their chirping.
If they have any notion of what is going on in the US, they conceal
it well.
And my God, the narcissism. Any more self-esteem among the talking
heads and they would need toe shoes. Reporters used to be honest drunks,
ashen-souled, chain-smoking, profane, ugly, their cynicism a conclusion, not a
pose, more concerned with getting the news than being the news. Ernie Pyle, Don
Marquis, Mencken, Seymour Hersh. Today “journalism” looks to be a
branch of central casting in Hollywood. We have Michael Moore, who in his working-stiff
costume seems to be trying out for a bit part in Rumble on the Docks, and Megyn
Kelly, a babble-blonde BJ bimbo hoping for a gig with Victoria’s Secret.
Mencken
‘Nuff said.