Tuesday, June 28, 2016

Fun with atheists - Vox Day

It's really remarkable to see how many atheists fail to understand what their "assume the other person is lying if he does not immediately present documentary evidence upon demand, which will of course be immediately dismissed for failing to meet the unexpressed demand for peer-reviewed and published scientific evidence" says about their personal integrity, or as is more precisely the case, their lack of it:
Supreme Dark Lord @voxday
The reason most atheists trust fellow atheists less than anyone else is because they recognize their own lack of integrity and morality.

Paul D
@Lost_in_Formosa
Any evidence for that?

Supreme Dark Lord
@voxday
Yes. Look it up.

Paul D
@Lost_in_Formosa
in other words, you just made it up, right?

Supreme Dark Lord
@voxday
No. You guys are so predictable. You assume lies. Why? Because you are an atheist and you readily lie.

Paul D
@Lost_in_Formosa
Why are you slandering a huge group of your fellow human beings?

Supreme Dark Lord
@voxday
You are lying. Truth cannot be slander by definition. You're really not helping the case for atheist integrity here.

Supreme Dark Lord
@voxday
Vox: Atheists don't trust other atheists because projection.

Atheist: Show me the evidence!

Vox: No.

Atheist: You lie!

Vox: Voila....
The amusing thing is that they still absolutely believe that they are the smart ones, the "bright" ones, because godless. It's now gotten to the point that when I hear someone is an atheist, rather than an agnostic, I now assume aggressive midwittery.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. And a refusal to provide freely available, readily accessible evidence on demand is not a reliable indication that the other party is lying. It could mean that, or it could simply indicate that the other party is aware that you are an intellectually overmatched and lazy little bastard who is going to quibble in a dishonest and self-serving manner about any evidence that is provided to you, no matter how reliable the sources.