George Soros has become the master manipulator of US and Western
politics manipulating media and political activity to further his own
neoliberal and globalist agenda. In the process he is taking real meaning out
of left wing politics, which are simply becoming an instrument Soros uses to
advance his agenda, his hijacking of the Occupy Movement and his orchestration
of the anti-Trump protests being cases in point.
By Gilbert
Mercier
The Duran
The Duran
November 26,
2016
“We live
in interesting times when protesters act out the tantrum of a super-rich man
who did not get his way despite all his money.”
Dady
Chery
Eighty-six-year-old
Hungarian-American, George Soros, is a very rich man. He currently ranks number
46 in the very exclusive club of richest persons in the world.
In 1947,
as Hungary tilted to the Soviet Union block, he went to the United Kingdom to
study economics. This early life experience made him not only an anti-communist
but also a staunch anti-Russian who was always plotting his revenge against the
Soviets.
Soros
knew that to have any say in the capitalist order, one had to become filthy
rich. At some point in his life, however, Mr. Soros decided that money only
mattered if he could leverage it in influencing policies on a global scale. His
role models for this aspect of his life were probably the two consiglieres
extraordinaire of the United States empire, slightly older than him, who are
Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski.
The three
men shared common views on the threat of the so-called communist domino effect
and later, once the Soviet Union had collapsed, became fervent champions of a
global empire with its nervous system in Washington. In their sociopath vision
of the world, a minute elite of wise men should have the planet as their oyster
while, we, the worker bees slave away at their mercy.
The
Marxist ideology that inspired the Russian, Chinese and Cuban revolutions
should be silenced forever, and even the dangerous successes of the French
and Haitian revolutions, based on the
philosophers of the Enlightenment, should never be considered by any national
entity as an option.
Mr. Soros
was a prime financier of Hillary Clinton’s campaign through one of his henchmen
John Podesta.
Soros
lost, and providing that the American people and the world citizenry learn a
valuable lesson, his Messianic objective of world domination, after a successful
goal of regime change in Russia, has failed with the mandate of President-Elect
Donald Trump.
As an
example, in February 2016, this is what Soros published in the fake left media
outlet that he sponsors: The Guardian. The essay had a quite provocative title,
and it was mainly addressed to Europe’s leadership and the public opinion. In “Putin Is a Bigger Threat to Europe’s Existence than ISIS,”
Soros wrote:
“The
Putin regime faces bankruptcy in 2017 when a large part of its foreign debt
matures, and political turmoil may erupt sooner than that. The President’s
popularity, which remains high, rests on a social contract requiring the
government to deliver stability and a slowly, but steadily rising standard of
living. Western sanctions coupled with the sharp decline in the price of oil
will force the regime to fail on both counts.”
All
geopolitical analysts make projections; some turn out to be accurate, others
not. But Soros is not a geopolitical analyst. This, in very few sentences, was
his battle plan for regime change in Russia.
In 1992
Soros crashed the Bank of England
Let’s look
at the specifics of the timeline in the trajectory of the unquestionable puppet
master of humanitarian imperialism.
It was in
1979 that Soros decided to diversify his already giant financial portfolio to
invest intomedia organisations and NGOs big or small.
His opaque so-called Open Society Foundationnow funnels money to
more than 100 organizations and various think-tanks.
But one
must understand first what sorts of ruthless strategies Soros has used to, not
only, acquire his fortune but also literally subdue a nation that used to be
the most powerful empire in history.
This
takes us to the UK on Black Wednesday, September 16, 1992, when George Soros
decided to show the world how powerful he was. That day, Soros did a short on the British Pound by dumping £10
billion worth of the currency on the UK stock market.
Soros
crashed the mighty Bank of England and showed everybody that he was more
powerful than a major economy’s central bank. This action made Soros £1.8
billion. It was immoral to ruin the lives of countless hard working British
citizens but, however, perfectly legal.
The
hijack and killing of Occupy
Occupy
was a real movement, at its inception in the fall of 2011. Some of us had even
hoped that it would be the dawn of a global revolution.
This did
not take into account George Soros’ minions of MoveOn,
Change.org, Answer Coalition and the
pseudo-intelligentsia of the American fake left. They infiltrated then hijacked the
movement. The stakes were too high, especially with Wall-Street friendly Barack
Obama due for reelection in 2012.
The final
battle of Occupy was fought and lost on December 4, 2011, in Washington DC. My
colleague Liam Fox and I were there. We
watched it go to waste. Until then, anarchist flags had flown above
the tents. The Occupy movement included Anarchists, as well as Greens,
neo-Marxists, and Libertarians, and it represented a real threat to the status
quo. Soros and his surrogates of the so-called ‘progressive
alternative media’ made sure Occupy became neutered, toothless and
finally dead. It would eventually become a convenient
voting block to reelect Barack Obama.
Soros,
the purple revolution, and the caviar eating fake left
Mr. Soros
is quite fashion conscious for an older gentleman, even though this term
doesn’t quite apply to the Ministry of Truth’s ultimate evil do-gooder. He
seems to fancy secondary colors when it comes to symbolizing the fake
‘revolutions’ with regime change goals that he indirectly orchestrates.
It is
clear that he had his hands in Iran’s green revolution in 2009, as well as
Ukraine’s orange revolution.
Now he
wants to bring a purple revolution to the United States, to challenge the
mandate of President-Elect Trump. This color revolution, like the others, will
ultimately fail, providing that police in cities or Trump’s supporters do not
fall for the provocation and either crack down or counter-protest.
The
mainstream media that Soros and his protege Hillary Clinton controlled have
been exposed by Wikileaks as the diligent presstitutes of the Ministry of Truth. CNN, MSNBC, the New York
Times, the Washington Post, NPR News and many others, have been unmasked as
biased propaganda outlets.
The same
goes for the founder of the Huffington Post, Ariana Huffington.
NPR News
cannot be considered to be an impartial media organization while it receives
massive funding from both George Soros and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation.
The
darling of the fake left Rachel Maddow, before getting her big paycheck gig at
MSNBC, started her career at the Soros-funded Air America radio.
Among the
pseudo-left alternative media, it is not much better.
Noam
Chomsky, who has been called “the Socrates of our times” by his colleague,
Chris Hedges, might have drunk his hemlock by endorsing Hillary Clinton.
The same
Chris Hedges, along with Cornell West, Amy Goodman and Naomi Klein were
shrewder when they endorsed Jill Stein. But they might want to step down from
their ivory towers from time to time and ask themselves a simple question: if
Stein was the candidate of the 99 percent, why did she only receive 1 percent
of the vote?
Another
character and instigator of the Soros-financed purple revolution is Michael
Moore: the documentary filmmaker has posed as a blue-collar ordinary working
man for more than a decade, even though he is a millionaire.
Moore is
organizing a one-million women march in Washington DC on the day of
President-Elect Trump’s inauguration, as an ultimate stand against his alleged
sexism. Who will lead Soros’s mighty purple female army along with Michael;
will it be generals Lady Gaga and Madonna?
On a more
serious note, Mr. Soros, and his Wall Street friends should reflect on what
would happen to the US stock market in case of increased tension with Russia
and China, which is what Soros has championed.
Would
China use what financier Warren Buffet called an economic weapon of mass
destruction and dump its $3 trillion of Treasury-Bond holdings in one day? The
net result for Wall Street would likely be as high as the return on the George
Soros and the Saudi investments in Hillary Clinton’s bid for the White House: a
zero sum game.
The
election of Donald Trump is an anomaly, an accident in the course of history.
As such it can be considered to be a paradigm shift, a reset on the dial of obsolete
models and ideologies.
This
article is dedicated to my old friend Liam
Fox.