Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign against Donald Trump
largely amounted to a reprise of the left's attacks on Judges Robert Bork and
Clarence Thomas in the 1980s. "Borking" -- nice slang for Hillary’s
"politics of personal destruction" (which she decried when it was
employed against her husband in 1998) -- succeeded against Judge Bork. It did
not work against Justice Clarence Thomas. And it demonstrably didn't work
against president-elect Trump.
So what is the left going to try next, now that Borking Mr.
Trump has failed?
"Massive resistance." that's what.
I laughed when Slate's Michelle Goldberg used the term on
NPR last week. Because the last time Democrats talked about "massive
resistance," it was Southern Democrats in the 1950s and 60s. They were
proclaiming undying resistance to an end to Jim Crow and forced
desegregation.
You know -- Little Rock. Selma. Montgomery. Governor George
Wallace standing in the schoolhouse door
Those Democrats.
Well, that's not we're dealing with here. What I'm
predicting is a return to the huge marches on Washington against the Vietnam
War. To the 24-hour picketing of the White House. To teach-ins. Student
strikes. Full-page ads and petitions. Leaks of classified information. An
unceasing drumbeat of media and academic criticism. The Movement, as
it came to be called, deployed a monthly "national mobilization,"
with a big march in DC and coordinated smaller demos around the country.
These tactics were deployed in the '60s and '70s, first
against President Lyndon Johnson and then against Richard Nixon.
Get ready, because it's coming again. Whether, this time,
the U.S. will confront -- as it did in the '70's -- violent actions by leftist
radicals, such as bombings, bank robberies and other actions to fund domestic
terrorism is anyone's guess. But we do know it did before. And we know that
today #occupywallstreet and #blacklivesmatter are out there.
We also know, from the mass demonstrations two years ago
against state labor legislation in Wisconsin and Ohio, that today's American
left is perfectly willing to deploy those tactics to take over and occupy state
capitols. Just ask Scott Walker and John Kasich. And in North Carolina, the
Dems successfully held “Moral Monday” rallies at the state capitol for four
years, resulting in the narrow defeat of the sitting Republican governor.
A friend involved in the inauguration next week reported
that downtown DC is plastered with posters
calling for counter-demonstrations in DC on Inauguration
Day. He Facebooked me pictures.
One
poster was from a new group. “Join us for a bold
mobilization against the inauguration of Donald Trump,” it proclaims. An
examination of the website suggests an affiliation with the “occupy” movement.
The other subway poster, quite striking, reminded me
of CPUSA posters from my college years in DC in the early '70's. All the colors
and the design were there. Even the dark yellow paper.
All of these calls for “direct action” center on January
20th. But there's more. On January 21, a "million-woman march" is
called for.
Meanwhile, new Democratic Facebook groups targeting
Mr. Trump and the Trump agenda pop up on my Facebook feed every day, asking me
to "Like" them. Last week, a full-page ad by a new group,
called refusefascism appeared
on page 7 of the New York Times.
All in all, its reminds me of the anti-Nixon
"Inhoguration" on the Mall on January 20th, 1973, which I covered as
a college journalist.
Of course, branding its opponents as "fascists"
has been a standard tactic of the global left since the 1980s. In Europe, Mr.
Putin & Co. still use it today against free Western governments and
institutions which he would like to subvert.
So, on one level, there's nothing new here.
And yet, all of this is sobering – if you remember your
history.
That's because there is a trap here. An American president
named Richard Nixon fell into it.
While the anti-war left of the 1970s failed to prevent
Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger from successfully bringing "peace with
honor" in Vietnam, they did succeed in provoking Watergate. That
scandal -- which covered a multitude of White House sins, all directed at the
anti-war left -- undid all that the Nixon administration had accomplished in
Southeast Asia. It drove an American president from office. It also led to the
disasters of the Carter administration.
Nixon's resignation happened within 21 months of the
greatest presidential landslide in American history. As with Hillary Clinton in
2016, George McGovern lost the presidential election of 1972. But the Nixon
administration's overreaction from 1969-1972 to the left's unending assault on
the presidency, our national security, and our institutions ultimately
succeeded in handing the American left its goal. America and the world paid for
it for years.
Therefore, in closing, I want to recall two voices from the
past. First, the late Washington Post columnist David Broder.
Second, the words of Richard M. Nixon as he left office in August, 1974.
Broder was the dean of DC political reporters. When Nixon
took office in January 1969, the leaders of the Antiwar Movement announced
that, having broken one president, they proposed to break the new one too.
Broder, a Democrat, dissented. In what became a highly
controversial column.entitled "The Breaking of a President: A Risky New
American Sport." Broder wrote: "It is becoming more and more
obvious with every passing day that the men and the movement who broke Lyndon
B. Johnson's authority in 1968 are out to break Richard Nixon in
1969." He continued: "When you have broken the President you have
broken the one man who can make peace."
That was in 1969. The same, of course, applies to
president-elect Trump today.
The antiwar left rejected David Broder's advice. And, with
Watergate, they and the Democrats in Congress succeeded in breaking another
president, driving him from office. The consequences we know.
What we also need to remember, however, is Richard Nixon's
warning on the day he was forced out. Speaking to friends, supporters, and the
White House staff, the president said: "Always remember others may
hate you but those who hate you don't win unless you hate them. And
then you destroy yourself."
Does anyone reading this doubt that the American left is
organized and determined to bring about a redo of 1974?
I suggest, therefore, that we all remember Nixon's words as
we prepare for the Trump Administration. Our opponents on the left are not,
most of them, America's enemies. So we should use laughter rather than vitriol
to defeat them.
But defeat them we must.
The one thing the Devil cannot stand is laughter.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/01/the_left_means_to_break_this_president.html#ixzz4VNgWGS8y
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook