We are witnessing a treasonous rebellion
by leftist judges who are declaring the last election null and void.
At the core of these traitors' arguments is the belief that the
people do not have the right to express their views through the electoral
process.
Essentially, these courts are declaring that President Trump
doesn't have the same authority as his predecessor and that the powers of the
executive branch are constrained by what the judiciary thinks is good policy.
These judges assert that President Trump can't overrule the
executive orders of his predecessor with his own executive
orders. If that were the case, elections would be meaningless, since
one president could effectively prevent the people from rejecting his position
by voting for a candidate who disagreed with him.
We see this in the judge's ruling on DACA. Ignoring for
a moment the fact that DACA was an unconstitutional usurpation of power by
Obama, there is still a huge problem with a court effectively declaring that
one president, Obama, can make edicts that other presidents can't change.
This is clearly not a claim by the court that some presidential
rulings are infallible, dogmatic, and unchangeable, since we all know that if
Bush had produced an executive order that violated the law by limiting legal
immigration, the same judge would have ruled that Obama could overrule it.
Instead, what we're seeing is nothing less than a rebellion by
judges who reject the idea that elections have consequences and believe they
can impose their beliefs on the people. The judges are declaring
that Democracy exists in the U.S. only to the extent that viewpoints that
judges consider acceptable can result from an election.
It's a far cry from declaring that the Constitution limits certain
actions by presidents to saying that the actions of presidents that the left
likes have more legal weight than the actions of presidents that judges don't
like do.
At the core of the #Resistance movement is the idea that America
is more a tyranny than a representative republic. By saying
elections are legitimate only so long as leftists approve of them, they are
declaring that power flows not from the people, as declared by the
Constitution, but from the unelected elites.
America cannot continue to exist as a free country if the ever
changing opinions of leftists carry the same authority as the Constitution and
the laws passed by the people's representatives in Congress.
Like all acts of open rebellion in America, these actions by
judges are nothing less than a declaration that some people in America are
worth less than others. This rebellion is the opposite of the
American Revolution, which was waged to ensure that the people, not the
aristocracy, held the reins of power and could have a major say in how their
country was managed.
The reality is that when faced with a direct rejection of the
principles upon which America is based, extreme measures are needed to stomp
out the rebellion. In this case, judges who issue insane edicts must
be impeached. It's time for the people to voice the truth that
judges are not some "super" agents who override the authority of the
people's representatives.
Sadly, the actions of these lower-court judges are simply a
continuation of what we've seen for decades in the Supreme Court.
Historically, the idea that the Supreme Court has the right to
stop the president and Congress from doing what the Court considers
unconstitutional has been viewed with suspicion. It's not in the
Constitution, and the people have never voted to endorse it.
However, as a matter of practicality, there needs to be some way
to stop the legislature from violating the Constitution, and the Supreme Court
has de facto become the Band-Aid used to cover that gap in
the Constitution.
But historically, we've seen that the Court can be a rather poor
source of guidance. From declaring that slavery was okay to saying
that forcibly sterilizing the "unfit" is fine, the Court has
demonstrated that it is a fallible and untrustworthy guide at best.
For decades, leftists have used judges to impose their whims on
the people. From legalizing abortion to inventing a right to
same-sex "marriage," leftists have used rebellious judges to
transform America without having to win elections or actually convince the
people that the leftist approach is good.
Leftists get away with this because the culture portrays judges as
impartial agents who are interested only in ensuring that the laws passed by
the Congress and enshrined in the Constitution are followed.
Yet we know that's not true, because the same leftists tell us
so. They tell us the Constitution is a "living"
document. That is saying in no uncertain terms that judges have the
authority to redefine the Constitution based on the judge's biases without
following the process the people accepted to modify the Constitution.
But if five judges, who are rich, mostly white, mostly male
lawyers, can arbitrarily redefine the rights of Americans by unilaterally
modifying the Constitution, we no longer live in a free society.
The current situation is worse in that the rebellion has spread to
the lower courts. Due to the lethargy of the legal process, one
federal judge can illegally stop the president from exercising his
constitutional power for months or years.
It's time for honest Americans who believe in democracy, as
witnessed by our acceptance of the legitimate authority that Obama had when he
was president, to convince the culture that many judges are not apolitical
honest actors.
It's time for Republicans to impeach judges who obviously overstep
their authority. It's time for Congress to pass a law requiring that
judges interpret the laws in light of the intent of the people who passed the
law.
Perhaps we need a constitutional amendment to explicitly demand
that judges not add their own spin to the laws of the land.
Or perhaps we need the Congress and the president to declare that
only the Supreme Court can limit their actions. Lower courts can
rule as they want, but only the Supreme Court can demand that the other branches
change their actions. This would reduce the ability of the rebels to
effectively kneecap our elected representatives through frivolous lawsuits
supported by traitorous judges. Before the traitors could stop
actions by Congress or the president they'd have to get the Supreme Court to
agree, as opposed to the current situation, where one of the thousands of
unelected federal judges can stop lawful actions by the president or Congress.
Whatever mechanism we use, the reality is that if we don't crush
the rebellion in the judiciary we will lose all our freedoms and America may be
headed toward an armed conflict.
This modern judicial rebellion seeks to impose its will on
everyone. From demanding that Christians support same-sex
"weddings" to demanding that Catholic nuns support abortion, the
fascist judges are insisting that all bow their knee to our new masters.
The risk of eventual violence is much worse than it was in the
case of the Civil War. In this new rebellion, there is no safe haven
for the new "slaves," those whose rights are being stolen by
traitors. There is no underground railroad for those who cherish
their constitutional rights.
The chance for real violence becomes greatest when people are
backed into a corner and told they must reject their own beliefs.
That's why it's imperative to take peaceful steps now to defuse
the crisis.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/01/the_judicial_rebellion.html