(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed) — At
this critical juncture in modern history where tensions run at an all-time high
between world powers that possess extensive nuclear weapons supplies, the
United States and the United Kingdom would do well to re-educate themselves on
the art of diplomacy.
Instead, the United Kingdom has put its foot on the throttle,
openly blaming Russia for poisoning a former Russian spy and his daughter in
the U.K. Together with France, Germany
and the United States, this western alliance has called on Russia to
explain the military-grade novichok nerve toxin attack on Sergei Skripal and
his daughter Yulia in Salisbury, England. They both remain in critical condition.
U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May was
one of the first to openly blame Russia for the incident, calling it a “brazen”
act and expelling 23 Russian diplomats almost immediately. She also cut off
high-level contact with Moscow for the attack on U.K. soil.
U.S. President Donald Trump also came out behind the U.K.,
stating it “certainly looks like the Russians were behind” the
incident. Apparently, Trump is happy to believe conspiracy theories regarding
Russian interference as long as he is not the subject matter.
Do we know the full facts regarding what happened to Skripal? No. But the
minute western governments not only claim to know what happened but also take
further action to demonize the state in question, we should immediately be
skeptical.
Let’s take a hypothetical scenario. Supposing someone wanted to
kill Skripal but hoped to make it look like the Russian government was behind
it, would it really be that hard for someone else to use the novichok nerve
toxin in the commission of the killing?
“Could somebody have smuggled something out [of the Soviet
Union]?” Amy
Smithson, a U.S.-based biological and chemical weapons expert, queried to Reuters. “I
certainly wouldn’t rule that possibility out, especially a small amount and
particularly in view of how lax the security was at Russian chemical facilities
in the early 1990s.”
If this is a possible scenario as Smithson has intimated, it
should be ruled out as a possibility before the U.K. expels Russian diplomats
who may or may not have been involved in an assassination attempt.
Diplomacy is an art form. Right now, we don’t need world powers
escalating tensions and blaming Russia for every single thing that goes wrong
across the globe.
Just how powerful is Russia, exactly? We are not only supposed
to believe that the former Soviet Union can elect presidents at whim in the
world’s most powerful country, but that it is also openly going around trying
to assassinate people on British soil using chemical weapons that would
directly implicate itself as the perpetrator.
Former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray wrote in a blog post:
“The same people who assured you that Saddam Hussein had WMD’s
now assure you Russian ‘novochok’ nerve agents are being wielded by Vladimir
Putin to attack people on British soil. As with the Iraqi WMD dossier, it is
essential to comb the evidence very finely. A vital missing word from Theresa
May’s statement yesterday was ‘only.’ She did not state that the nerve agent
used was manufactured ONLY by Russia. She rather stated this group of nerve
agents had been ‘developed by’ Russia. Antibiotics were first developed by a
Scotsman, but that is not evidence that all antibiotics are today administered
by Scots.”
Murray also referred his
readers to an article in Foreign Policy that laid out Israel’s
quietly advancing chemical and biological weapon capabilities. If we want to talk
about evidence, it’s actually worth noting that Israel is reportedly in the business of launching assassination attempts,
even on scientists and researchers.
Israeli operatives have even been caught during their assassination attempts
whereas, as Murray notes, Russia has never actually killed a “swapped spy”
before. Of course, this is not to say that Israel is responsible for the crime
in question, but until hard evidence is produced that directly implicates the
current Russian leadership, it is worth considering that other countries also
have the power to launch assassination attempts.
Regardless, more allegations against Russia are still mounting.
The U.S. recently accused Russia
of a wide-ranging cyber assault on its energy grid and other parts of its
infrastructure, gearing up to impose more sanctions in response.
Now, after years of constantly being painted as the enemy,
Russia just declared via
Twitter that a “Cold War II” has, indeed, begun. And who can blame them?
It is time for these countries to go back to the drawing board
and teach themselves diplomacy. Nikki Haley is not a diplomat,
the essential requirement of her job at the U.N. She is a warmongering
neoconservative who is incapable of asking for basic evidence. The only
high-level politician calling for diplomacy is the
U.K.’s Jeremy Corbyn, the same man who is persistently demonized by
the local and worldwide media, even while he has continued to be on the right side of history regarding
almost every conflict since he became a politician.
“This horrific event demands first of all the most thorough and
painstaking criminal investigation, conducted by our police and security
services,” Corbyn said.
“To rush way ahead of the evidence being gathered by the police,
in a fevered parliamentary atmosphere, serves neither justice nor our national
security.”
He also said that his Labour party is “of course no
supporter of the Putin regime, its conservative authoritarianism, abuse of
human rights or political and economic corruption” but “that
does not mean we should resign ourselves to a ‘new cold war’ of escalating arms
spending, proxy conflicts across the globe and a McCarthyite intolerance of
dissent.”
While the calm voice of reason, Corbyn to this day is vilified
by the corporate media.
The hostility towards Russia is one thing, but the double standards and hypocrisy are
completely mind-blowing. The U.S. and its allies are the most meddlesome
entities on the planet, but whenever something moves that can be blamed on
Russia, Syria, North Korea or Iran, they take immediate action against
adversarial states before a full investigation can ever be completed.
It is a shoot first, ask questions later type of approach, and
it needs to stop.
Read more by Darius Shahtahmasebi:
- Syrian Rebels Using Snipers
to Kill Civilians Trying to Flee War-Torn Syrian City
- Watch: Colonel Says Israel Is
Dragging the United States Into World War III
- Putin Will Destroy the
World With Nuclear Weapons If Russia Is Bombed First
- Revealed: Israel’s Disturbing
Policy of Assassinating Scientists
- What the Media Isn’t Telling
You About America’s True Intentions in Syria
- May 14th Could Be the Most
Catastrophic Day to Rock the Middle East in Years
- The Real Reason Israel and Lebanon Are on the Verge
of War
Op-ed / Creative Commons / Anti-Media / Report a
typo
Since you’re here…
…We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing
Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising
revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news
organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible
journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even.
Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s
independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort
to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do,
too.
If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps
fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a
minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us