Strange, that Rod Dreher seems to think so, but he doesn't grasp that
it is only the foundation built upon the rock that will stand:
I heard from a friend this morning who told me a story about a family we
both know. A solid white working-class family. In the youngest generation,
they’ve started falling apart in a way that will be hard to fix. It’s the usual
Charles Murray Coming Apart thing: the loss of being bound by a sense of
religious or traditional moral obligation, followed by a loss of a sense of the
importance of marriage, especially for childbearing, and on down the line.
Maybe they’ll pull out of this spiral, but odds are against them. I would bet
money that some of them are thinking of the trouble they’re in as something
that just happened to them. It’s like people who live in a nice house, but who
wake up one day to discover that the yard has turned into a jungle of weeds, and
the roof is leaking, and termites have eaten out the walls … and they wonder
who came overnight and destroyed their nice house....
No social species can survive if its men (and women) are too drugged out and undisciplined to hold a job. No social species can survive if its people cannot make the adaptive imperatives that Wade Davis says all cultures must make. My dad was a civil servant and my mother was a school bus driver. My folks never had much money, and were, as I see now, living much closer to the edge than they let us know as kids. They didn’t want to burden us with anxiety. I also understand why my father instinctively imprinted the same taboos on his children. His basic code was:
No social species can survive if its men (and women) are too drugged out and undisciplined to hold a job. No social species can survive if its people cannot make the adaptive imperatives that Wade Davis says all cultures must make. My dad was a civil servant and my mother was a school bus driver. My folks never had much money, and were, as I see now, living much closer to the edge than they let us know as kids. They didn’t want to burden us with anxiety. I also understand why my father instinctively imprinted the same taboos on his children. His basic code was:
- Work hard,
and above all things esteem those who do
- Respect
yourself and those around you, especially your elders
- That means
dress up for church, say “yes ma’am” and “yes sir,” “please” and “thank
you,” and keep a clean yard
- Be honest
and fair
- Do not
lie, and that means in all things be true to your word
- Be
generous to others, but never expect anybody to give you anything
- Kids need
mamas and daddies, but a mama and/or a daddy who puts their own interests
above doing right by their kids are of no account
- Do not
keep company with people who don’t believe these things and live by them,
because they will only bring you down
You will note that “God” is not in this list. He believed in God, but his
God was pretty much the transcendent guarantor of this code, and nothing more.
The
problem is that there are too many who want to cut down the tree but keep
living in the tree house. They don't understand that it simply isn't going to
float there in the air by itself, but without the tree, it will fall to the
ground, be smashed to bits, and badly harm everyone inside it. This is not a
mystery. The descent of the modernists is the descent into post-Christianity
and societal self-destruction. And the fact that the modernists are opposed to
their natural successors, the post-modernists, does not make them on our side.
