South
Africa Is On The Road To Barbarism
Life
in a failed multi-cultural society:
Identity
Politics At Work:
Notice
that at a Human Rights Day rally in Mpumalanga, “human rights” is associated
with “cutting the throat of whiteness.” This legitimizes the murder and
dispossession of South African whites, who have been in the country longer than
most blacks, as an exercise in human rights. The leader of the new black party
that is challenging the one to which the former white government handed over
power even has a song about shooting whites.
How many
years before it happens in “diversity multi-cultural” Europe and America?
What is
wrong with the Russians that they want to be associated with a West that is
actively pursuing self-destruction? How long before it is not only white South
Africans who are fleeing to Russia to save their lives?
Who
destroyed the West? There are different answers to this question. I believe the
unleashed greed of Capitalism by deregulation, the burial of Anti-Trust, and
the redefinition of corporate responsibility to include only responsibility to
shareholders to the detriment of employees, customers, and communities,
destroyed the West. Psychology Professor Kevin McDonald thinks it was the
paranoia of the Jews who protected themselves by fomenting division within the
societies in which they live.
In a
review of McDonald’s book, The
Culture of Critique, labeled by the Israel Lobby an anti-semitic
work, Stanley Hornbeck writes:
“Prof.
MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which Jews have
advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and diversity – but only for others. Ever
since the 19th century, they have led movements that tried to discredit the
traditional foundations of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the
Christian basis for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the
same time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of
Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in gentile
society.
“Why is
this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group loyalty
characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a society that does not
have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The Jewish determination not to
assimilate fully, which accounts for their survival as a people for thousands
for years – even without a country – has invariably attracted unpleasant and
even murderous scrutiny in nations with well-defined national identities. In
Prof. MacDonald’s view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and
weaken the identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can
flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.
“Prof.
MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman: ‘American Jews
are committed to cultural tolerance because of their belief – one firmly rooted
in history – that Jews are safe only in a society acceptant of a wide range of
attitudes and behaviors, as well as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups.
It is this belief, for example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an
overwhelming majority of American Jews to endorse ‘gay rights’ and to take a
liberal stance on most other so-called ‘social’ issues.'” http://www.heretical.com/miscellx/culturec.html
I do not
know Professor MacDonald and cannot attest as to whether he is or is not an
anti-semite. However, I do not see anti-semitism in his explanation, which is a
rational explanation of why a paranoid people who have experienced persecution,
justified or not, would strive to protect themselves by creating division in
the societies in which they are a minority. The Identity Politics of the
Democratic Party works perfectly in behalf of the Jewish strategy.
There is
no doubt that this strategy works for Jews who feel threatened despite the
enormous power that they wield over the US and Europe. The question is: Is the
strategy that is successful for Jews good for the majority populations who have
been turned against one another: blacks against whites, feminists against men,
homosexuals against heterosexuals. Does making the white heterosexual father,
son, and brother into the victimizer who victimizes everyone else a healthy
formula for a successful society?
I can’t
see how this question can be answered in the affirmative.
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/08/02/south-africa-is-on-the-road-to-barbarism-and-so-is-the-rest-of-the-west/