When the ideology of globalism is discussed in liberty
movement circles there are often misunderstandings as to the source of the
threat and what it truly represents. This may in some cases be by design. In
the latest era of supposed “populism” led by figures like Donald Trump, an
entirely new and very green generation of liberty activists find themselves
hyper focused on the political left in general, but they seem to be obsessed
with attacking the symptoms of globalism rather than the source. I attribute
this to a clever propaganda campaign by globalist institutions.
For example, when globalism is brought up in terms of its
conspiratorial influences, the name of George Soros is usually mentioned. Soros
is an obvious bogeyman for liberty activists because his money can be found
flowing to numerous Cultural Marxist (social justice) organizations and his
influence is easily grasped and digested in that way. Conservatives like
placing emphasis on Soros because he appears decidedly leftist and thus
globalism becomes synonymous with leftist movements. But what about all the globalists within the political
right?
Globalism has its
gatekeepers in both political camps; people that manipulate or outright control political leaders
and political messages on the right just as they do on the left. While someone
like George Soros acts as a gatekeeper for the left, we also have people like
Henry Kissinger, a globalist gatekeeper for the right. Kissinger’s close
relations with the Trump administration or his long time friendship with
Russia’s Vladimir Putin are brought up far less in the liberty movement these
days. Why? Because this does not fit with the false narrative that the
globalists are “targeting” Trump or Putin. When you examine these leaders and
their ties to a vast array of globalist proponents, this claim becomes absurd.
In 2016, months before the presidential election, the globalist
media outlet Bloomberg published an article which salivated over the
possibility that Trump would swallow up and assimilate what they called the
“Tea Party,” ultimately destroying it. At that time the media used the term
“Tea Party” as code for any sovereignty or constitutional group, just as the
media tried to wrap us all up in the term “alt-right” after Trump’s election.
There was a reason why Bloomberg found particular glee in the
notion that Trump would absorb the liberty movement. The movement was becoming
a decentralized threat to the globalist agenda, a threat that could not be
easily quantified or dominated because it had no identifiable leadership. We
were a movement based on knowledge and individual action. Our best “leaders”
have been teachers, not politicians, and these were people that led by personal
example, not by mandate or rhetoric.
The liberty movement was winning ground in every conceivable
arena, from the dismantling of the mainstream media through alternative
platforms, to the great push back against social justice cultism. Something had
to be done.
Enter Trump, a brash pop culture icon with a flare for
sensationalism. He was no statesman like Ron Paul explaining the intricacies of
America’s problems in a measured way. No, Trump was like a wrecking ball, a
loud and blatant message to the left that we were tired of being on the defensive
and we were coming for them. But
the reality was that Trump was not a necessary element of the fight. He never
was. Anti-globalism and anti-social justice were already hitting the
mainstream. The left was already on the run. Trump didn’t create that wave, the
liberty movement did that for him, he just rode it into the White House. You’re
welcome, Donald.
The problem was that Trump was not what he seemed to be to many
people. With all his rhetoric against the banking elites which he referred to
as creatures of the “swamp” choking Washington, Trump then proceeded to load up
his presidential cabinet with elitists and globalists as soon as he was
elected. These very same cabinet members and advisers went on to attend
globalist meetings like the secretive Bilderberg Group AFTER Trump had been
elected. People like Rothschild banking agent and Commerce Secretary Wilber
Ross who officially attended in 2017, or adviser Peter Thiel who officially
attended in 2018.
This was not at all surprising to me. I predicted this would be
the likely outcome (along with a Trump presidency) in my article “Clinton Versus Trump And The
Co-Option Of The Liberty Movement,” published in September
2016.
The point is, simply picking
the side of the political right is not enough to protect activists from
globalist subversion. By rallying around controlled politicians and
bottle-necking our actions the liberty movement makes itself vulnerable and
decidedly impotent.
So, the question arises —
how do we continue to fight against the 4th Generation warfare
being levied against us? Part of the solution continues to rest in our own
understanding of the enemy.
I still hold to the idea that the best way to understand
globalism is to study and expose the efforts of a group called the “Fabian
Society,” otherwise known as Fabian Socialists. The society was founded in
England in 1884 and was an extension of the “Round Table” groups being
established by global elitists in the West at the time. The Fabians have been
at the forefront of almost every pro-socialist and pro-globalist movement of
the past century, and while they do not get as much attention as institutions
like the Council on Foreign Relations or even the Bilderberg Group, their open
discussions on their own motivations and goals make them a prime source of data
on the psychology of our opponents.
The Fabian Society has multiple mascots which hint at the nature
of globalism. One symbol of the group is an angry turtle with the slogan “When
I strike I strike hard,” indicating the slow and deliberate nature of globalism
and its methodical spread into every aspect of our daily lives. Another mascot
they have used in the past is a wolf dressed up as a sheep, a symbol which I
think is self explanatory, but to clarify - a person that appears to be
anti-globalist in rhetoric or who is criticized by people like the Fabians may
still be a Fabian in disguise. Their relationships with elitists will
expose their true nature as a Trojan Horse.
I think that the best representation of these people and their
thinking resides in their own words, however. Here are some choice quotes from
past members:
…The Open Conspiracy
will appear first, I believe as a conscious organization of intelligent, and in
some cases wealthy men, as a movement having distinct social and political
aims, confessedly ignoring most of the existing apparatus of political control,
or using it only as an incidental implement in the stages, a mere movement of a
number of people in a certain direction, who will presently discover, with a
sort of a surprise, the common object toward which they are all moving. In all
sorts of ways, they will be influencing and controlling the ostensible
government.” — H.G. Wells: The
Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution, 1928.
“I also made it quite
clear that socialism means equality of income or nothing, and that under
Socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed,
clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were
discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this
trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were
permitted to live you would have to live well.” — George Bernard
Shaw, The Intelligent
Woman’s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism, 1928
“I do not pretend that
birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing.
There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would
prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in
this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a
Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation
survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. There would
be nothing in this to offend the consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions
of nationalists. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of
that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other
people’s.” — Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society, 1953
“I think the subject which will be of most importance
politically is mass psychology. … Various results will soon be arrived at: that
the influence of home is obstructive… although this science will be diligently
studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will
not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique
has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a
generatio will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies
or policemen … Educational propaganda, with government help, could achieve this
result in a generation. There are, however, two powerful forces opposed to such
a policy: one is religion; the other is nationalism. … A scientific world
society cannot be stable unless there is a world government.” — Bertrand
Russell: The Impact of
Science on Society, 1953
“And it seems to me
perfectly in the cards that there will be within the next generation or so a
pharmacological method of making people love their servitude, and producing … a
kind of painless concentration camp for entire societies, so that people will
in fact have their liberties taken away from them but will rather enjoy it,
because they will be distracted from any desire to rebel by propaganda, brainwashing,
or brainwashing enhanced by pharmacological methods.” — Aldous Huxley,
“The Ultimate Revolution” March 20, 1962 Berkeley Language Center
Today, the Fabian Society still exists and operates as a think
tank much like any other globalist think tank. Their articles and essays push
the latest globalist propaganda from the erasure of national sovereignty to the
promotion of gender politics and gender “fluidity.” But what can we draw from
these writings and the statements of past members?
First, globalists use guerrilla-like tactics to achieve their
goals and they often act slowly and quietly over the course of years or
decades. The Fabian Society was named after the Roman General Quintus Fabius
Maximus who famously used tactics of attrition and delay to defeat his enemies.
Liberty
activists need to start thinking in terms of the long game, much like a chess
player does, in order to grasp the globalist agenda. The events triggered today
may have intended effects which are not necessarily obvious to us now unless we
consider how they relate to the greater scheme.
This is especially true in terms of economics. Globalists stage fiscal bubbles many
years in advance, and use economic crisis as a catalyst for social change on a
grand scale. Usually this results in ever increasing centralization of
wealth and power. However, the shift of financial dominance is subtle to
those who do not pay particular attention to the details. A market bubble
might take a decade to develop before it is deliberately popped. In the
meantime all the fundamentals are screaming that something is very wrong, but
the majority of the public remains oblivious until it is too late.
Second, control of governments and political leaders is paramount to
the success of globalism. The notion that ANY major political leader comes to power
without globalist influence is utterly naive. Trump and his swamp creature
appointed cabinet are perfect examples of this. Rhetoric is meaningless, and
while such leaders may throw their base a bone now and then, in the end their
actions only push the ball forward for the globalists. This may even include
sabotaging their own presidency to make way for a globalist “solution.”
Third, mass psychology is a globalist obsession. All power stems from
perception.
Figureheads and ideological groups sometimes offer the promise of social
advantage to the public without much effort on their part. The temptation of
this offer can lead people to hand over their free will in exchange. But not
all “progress” is actually advantageous for the masses and misery usually
follows such Faustian deals with the elites. Escape is difficult.
Therefore, globalists must control the narrative at all costs.
The public has to be divided as much as possible in order to keep them
distracted from the guiding hand of the cabal itself. And, any group that
opposes them directly has to be co-opted or destroyed. The more people focus on
globalists and their organizations as the core source of social instability,
the more uncomfortable they become.
Fourth, most globalist
actions today rely on 4th Generation warfare; meaning, few
things are exactly as they seem, ever. I suspect the success of
liberty activists has forced them into more elaborate forms of theater. Nothing
they do is ever simple unless you have studied the motivations and mindset of
the globalists, then they become rather predictable, unoriginal and bizarrely
robotic in their behavior. They appear brilliant in the execution of their
agendas only because they have centuries of experience implementing the same
con games over and over. They are sociopathic grifters; they are clever and
without remorse, but not geniuses in any sense of the word.
For
now, educating the general liberty movement and the people around us on these issues
remains the best method for throwing a monkey wrench into the globalist
machine. Countering their psyops should be our pinnacle task, and falling into
the narrative traps they create must be avoided. They have spent a considerable
amount of thought and energy trying to co-opt our efforts, and that should give
everyone pause. For if we were not a true threat, why would they bother with
us?
If
you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just
read, visit our donations page here.
We greatly appreciate your patronage.
You can contact Brandon Smith at: