An independent audit of
the key temperature dataset that is being used by climate models has exposed
more than 70 problems with the data which render it
“unfit for global studies.”
Problems include zero degree temperatures in the Caribbean, 82
degree C temperatures in Colombia and ship-based recordings taken 100km inland.
The audit has concluded that
the studies are deliberately exaggerating temperatures to support a theory
of global warming utilizing
global averages that are far less certain than what is being forecast.
The audit has revealed that
“that climate models have been tuned
to match incorrect data, which would render incorrect their predictions of
future temperatures and estimates of the human influence of temperatures.” Furthermore, the Paris Climate
Agreement adopted 1850-1899 averages as “indicative” of pre-industrial
temperatures is “fatally flawed.” The entire Paris Climate Agreement has
an agenda to eliminate effectively the advancement of society and attempt to
reset the clock to the pre-Industrial Revolution. This entire theory that before the
Industrial Revolution, our planet’s atmosphere was somehow pristine and
uncontaminated by human-made pollutants has been also proven to be completely
bogus.
Bubbles trapped in Greenland’s ice has revealed that we began
emitting greenhouse gases at least 2,000 years ago. The Romans even constructed the
first aqueduct was built in 312 BC because there was a serious problem
with water pollution. Seneca (c 4BC-65AD), the adviser to
Nero, wrote in 61AD: “No sooner had I left behind the oppressive
atmosphere of the city [Rome] and that reek of smoking cookers which pour
out, along with clouds of ashes, all the poisonous fumes they’ve accumulated in
their interiors whenever they’re started up, than I noticed the change in my
condition.”
This new audit argues even the most simple basic quality
checks had not been done on the HadCRUT4 data which
is managed by the UK Met Office Hadley Centre and the Climate Research Unit at
the University of East Anglia. The audit exposed that estimates were made
of the uncertainties arising from thermometer accuracy, homogenization,
sampling grid boxes with a finite number of measurements available, large-scale
biases such as urbanization and estimation of regional averages with
non-complete global measurement coverage.
The audit has exposed the
dishonesty in this entire scheme and it appears to be directed at the goal of
reducing the population. Anomalies it has identified include at St Kitts in the Caribbean,
the average temperature for December 1981 was zero degrees, normally it’s
26C. For three months in 1978, one place in Colombia reported an 82
degrees Celsius average – hotter than the hottest day on Earth. Then in
Romania, one September the average temperature was reported as minus 46°C,
which has never happened. The data showed that supposedly ships would report
ocean temperatures from places up to 100km inland. The paper also points out that the
most serious flaws identified was the shortage of data. For the first two
years, from 1850 onwards, the only land-based reporting station in the Southern
Hemisphere was in Indonesia. Then there were ship observations at the time
but Australian records had not started until 1855 in Melbourne, behind Auckland
which started in 1853. This data appears to have been just made up.
According to the HadCRUT4
calculation of coverage, it was almost 1950 before there was data from even
half of the Southern Hemisphere was available. Yet they claim global warming
has taken hold for 100 years prior. Then the Paris Climate Agreement takes
the HadCRUT4 average from 1850 to 1899 as an “indicative” temperature or
pre-Industrial Revolution. There is absolutely no possible way the data set being used to support
all this Global Warming is even valid for any forecast.