The AngloZionist propaganda
machine is constantly warning us that Russia is about to invade some country.
The list of candidates for invasion is long and ranges from Norway to the
Ukraine and includes the Baltic statelets, Poland and even countries further
West. Of course, we are also told that NATO and the US are here to prevent
that. Well, thank God for them, right?
But what is conspicuously
missing from this narrative is a discussion of the possible Russian motives for
such a military move. Typically, we are merely told that Russia has broken the
European post-Cold War order and borders by “annexing” Crimea and by sending
military forces into the Donbass. Anybody with an IQ at room temperature or
above by now realizes that both of these claims are total bunk. The ones who
indeed broke the post-Cold War international order and borders were the NATO
member states when they used military force, in complete illegality, to
break-up Yugoslavia. As for the people of Crimea, they had the opportunity to
vote about their future in a referendum, very much unlike the inhabitants of
Kosovo which had no such opportunity. As for the 08.08.08 war, even the
Europeans who eventually, and very reluctantly, agreed that it was, in fact,
Saakashvili who started this conflict, not Russia.
But let’s set all this aside
and assume that the Russian leaders would not hesitate to use military force
again if it was to their advantage. Let’s assume that, yes, the Russians are up
to no good and that they might well try to bite-off some other piece of land
somewhere in Europe.
Such an assumption would
immediately raise a crucial question: why would the Russians want to do that?
(Read full details at link
below)
Honestly, we should have no
illusions about the nature of the western plutocracy, and we should always heed
the Marxist truism which states that “the state is an apparatus of violence which fulfills the will of
the ruling class.” We all know who the ruling class of the AngloZionist Empire is
composed of, don’t we?
Western liberal democracies are, in reality, plutocracies which were
created by a class of capitalist thugs with the purpose of controlling our
entire planet. This was true before WWII. This was also true during and after
WWII and this has not changed, notwithstanding all the sanguine denunciations
of Fascism and Nazism.
What this means is that it is
the western ruling elites which need war to survive and preserve the New World
Order they have attempted to impose on all of us. Russia does not need war –
she only needs peace.
Conclusion: relax, folks, the
Russians ain’t coming, I promise!
AngloZionist paranoid collective hallucinations notwithstanding, the
Russians are not coming. Yes, they will annihilate you if you are crazy enough to
attack them but, no, they are not coming, at least not of their own volition.
Not even to liberate the Russian minorities in Apartheid Latvia or the Nazi-occupied
Ukrainian Banderastan. The Russian policy towards these regimes is very simple:
let them collapse on their own. After all, they will all eventually come
knocking sooner or later, as ideological delusions are powerless against
geographical realities.
I will let a much better person than myself conclude this article.
This is what Professor Stephen Cohen recently had to say about the
risks of war:
He indeed is the “voice of one crying in the wilderness.”
Will enough people listen to him to avoid an apocalypse?
I don’t know.