As the 18th anniversary of 9/11
approached, the arrest and alleged suicide of Jeffrey Epstein made
headlines—and raised questions about the credibility of official narratives.
As Eric Rasmusen writes:
“Everybody, it seems, in New York society knew by 2000 that Jeffrey Epstein and
Ghislaine Maxwell were corrupting teenage girls, but the press wouldn’t cover
it.” Likewise, everybody in
New York society has long known that Larry Silverstein, who bought the
asbestos-riddled white elephant World Trade Center in July 2001 and immediately
doubled the insurance, is a mobbed-up friend of Netanyahu and a confessed participant in the controlled
demolition of Building 7, from which he earned over 700 million
insurance dollars on the pretext that al-Qaeda had somehow brought it down. But
the press won’t cover that either.
The New York Times, America’s newspaper of
record, has the investigative talent and resources to expose major corruption
in New York. Why did the Times spend almost two decades ignoring the all-too-obvious antics
of Epstein and Silverstein? Why is it letting the absurd tale of Epstein’s
alleged suicide stand? Why hasn’t it used the work of Architects and Engineers
for 9/11 Truth—including the brand-new University of Alaska study on the controlled
demolition of WTC-7—to expose the biggest scandal of the 21st century, if not all of
American history?
The only conceivable answer is
that The
New York Times is
somehow complicit in these monstrous crimes. It must be protecting its friends
in high places. So who are those friends, and where are those high places?
One thing Epstein and
Silverstein have in common, besides names ending in “-stein,” is alleged
involvement in the illicit sex industry. Epstein’s antics, or at least some of
them, are by now well-known. Not so for Silverstein, who apparently began his
rags-to-9/11-riches story as a pimp supplying prostitutes and nude dancers to
the shadier venues of NYC, alongside other illicit activities including “the heroin trade, money
laundering and New York Police corruption.” All of this was
exposed in a mid-1990s lawsuit. But good luck finding any investigative reports
in The
New York Times.
Another Epstein-Silverstein connection is their relationships to major
American Jewish organizations. Even while he was allegedly pimping girls and running heroin,
Larry Silverstein served as president for United Jewish Appeal of New York. As
for Epstein, he was the boy toy and protégé of Les Wexner, co-founder of the Mega Group of Jewish
billionaires associated with the World Jewish Congress, the
Anti-Defamation League, and other pro-Israel groups. Indeed, there is no
evidence that “self-made billionaire” Epstein ever earned significant amounts
of money; his only investment “client” was Les Wexner. Epstein, a professional
sexual blackmailer, used his supposed billionaire status as a cover story. In
fact, he was just an employee working for Wexner and associated
criminal/intelligence networks.
Which brings us to the third and most important Epstein-Silverstein
similarity: They were both close to the government of Israel. Jeffrey Epstein’s
handler was Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of Mossad super-spy Robert Maxwell;
among his friends was Ehud Barak, who is currently challenging Netanyahu for
leadership of Israel. Larry Silverstein, too, has friends in high Israeli
places. According to Haaretz, Silverstein has “close ties with
Netanyahu” (speaking to him on the phone every weekend) as well as with Ehud
Barak, “whom Silverstein in the past offered a job as his representative in
Israel” and who called Silverstein immediately after 9/11.
We may reasonably surmise that
both Jeffrey Epstein and Larry Silverstein have been carrying on very important
work on behalf of the state of Israel. And we may also surmise that this is the reason The New York Times has been covering up the
scandals associated with both Israeli agents for almost two decades. The Times, though it pretends to be America’s
newspaper of record, has always been Jewish-owned-and-operated. Its coverage
has always been grotesquely distorted in
favor of Israel. It has no interest in exposing the way Israel
controls the United States by blackmailing its leaders (Epstein) and staging a
fake “Arab-Muslim attack on America” (Silverstein). The awful truth is
that The New York Times is part of the same Jewish-Zionist “we control America”
network as Jeffrey Epstein and Larry Silverstein.
Epstein “Suicide” Illustrates
Zionist Control of USA—and the Decadence and Depravity of Western Secularism
Since The New York Times and other mainstream
media won’t go there, let’s reflect on the facts and lessons of the Jeffrey
Epstein suicide scandal—a national disgrace that ought to shock Americans into
rethinking their worldviews in general, and their views on the official myth of
9/11 in particular.
On Saturday, August 10, 2019,
convicted child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein was allegedly found dead in his
cell at Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York City, one of
America’s most corrupt prisons. The authorities claim Epstein hanged himself.
But nobody, not even the presstitutes of America’s corporate propaganda media,
convincingly pretends to believe the official story.
Jeffrey Epstein was a pedophile
pimp to presidents and potentates. His job was recruiting young girls for sex,
then offering them to powerful men—in settings outfitted with hidden video
cameras. When police raided his New York townhouse on July 6-7 2019 they found
locked safes full of pornographic pictures of underage girls, along with piles
of compact discs labeled “young (name of girl) + (name of VIP).” Epstein had
been openly and brazenly carrying on such activities for more than two decades,
as reported throughout most of that period by alternative media outlets
including my own Truth Jihad Radio and False Flag Weekly News.
(Even before the 2016 elections, my audience knew that both Bill Clinton and
Donald Trump were blackmailed clients of Jeffrey Epstein, that Clinton was a
frequent flyer on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” private jet, and that Trump had
been credibly accused in a lawsuit of joining Epstein in the brutal rape of a
13-year-old, to whom Trump then allegedly issued death threats.) It was only in
the summer of 2019 that mainstream media and New York City prosecutors started
talking about what used to be consigned to the world of “conspiracy theories.”
So who was Epstein working for? His primary employer was undoubtedly the
Israeli Mossad and its worldwide Zionist crime network. Epstein’s handler was
Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of Mossad super-spy Robert Maxwell. According to
sworn depositions, Ghislaine Maxwell recruited underage girls for Epstein and
oversaw his sex trafficking operations. As the New Yorker reported August 16: “In court
papers that were unsealed on August 9th, it was alleged that Maxwell had been
Epstein’s central accomplice, first as his girlfriend, and, later, as his
trusted friend and procuress, grooming a steady stream of girls, some as young
as fourteen, coercing them to have sex with Epstein at his various residences
around the world, and occasionally participating in the sexual abuse herself.”
Alongside Maxwell, Epstein’s other Mossad handler was Les Wexner, co-founder of
the notorious Mega Group of billionaire Israeli spies, who
appears to have originally recruited the penniless Epstein and handed him a
phony fortune so Epstein could pose as a billionaire playboy.
Even after Epstein’s shady
“suicide” mega-Mossadnik Maxwell continued to flaunt her impunity from American
justice. She no doubt conspired to publicize the August 15 New York Post photograph of herself
smiling and looking “chillingly serene” at In-And-Out-Burger in Los Angeles,
reading The
Book of Honor: The Secret Lives and Deaths of C.I.A. Operatives. That nauseating photo
inspired the New Yorker to accuse her of having
“gall”—a euphemism for the Yiddish chutzpah,
a quality that flourishes in the overlapping Zionist and Kosher Nostra
communities.
Maxwell and The New York Post, both Kosher Nostra/Mossad assets, were obviously sending a message to
the CIA: Don’t mess with us or we will expose your complicity in these
scandalous crimes. That is the Mossad’s standard
operating procedure: Infiltrate and compromise Western intelligence services in
order to prevent them from interfering with the Zionists’ over-the-top
atrocities. According to French historian Laurent Guyénot’s hypothesis,
the CIA’s false flag fake assassination attempt on President John F. Kennedy,
designed to be blamed on Cuba, was transformed by Mossad into a real
assassination—and the CIA couldn’t expose it due to its own complicity. (The motive: Stop JFK from
ending Israel’s nuclear program.) The same scenario, Guyénot argues, explains
the anomalies of the Mohamed Merah affair,
the Charlie Hebdo killings, and the 9/11 false flag operation. It would not be
surprising if Zionist-infiltrated elements of the CIA were made complicit in
Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual blackmail activities, in order to protect Israel in
the event Epstein had to be “burned” (which is apparently what has finally
occurred).
So what really happened to
Epstein? Perhaps the most likely scenario is that the Kosher Nostra, which owns
New York in general and the mobbed-up MCC prison in particular, allowed the
Mossad to exfiltrate Epstein to Occupied Palestine, where he will be given a
facelift, a pension, a luxury suite overlooking the Mediterranean, and a steady
stream of young sex slaves (Israel is the world’s capital of human trafficking,
an honor it claimed from the Kosher Nostra enclaves of Odessa after World War
II). Once the media heat wave blows over, Epstein will undoubtedly enjoy visits
from his former Mossad handler Ghislaine Maxwell, his good friend Ehud Barak,
and various other Zionist VIPs. He may even offer fresh sex slaves to visiting
American congressmen.
This is not just a paranoid
fantasy scenario. According to Eric Rasmusen:
“The Justice Dept. had better not have let Epstein’s body be cremated. And
they’d better give us convincing evidence that it’s his body. If I had $100
million to get out of jail with, acquiring a corpse and bribing a few people to
switch fingerprints and DNA wouldn’t be hard. I find it worrying that the
government has not released proof that Epstein is dead or a copy of the
autopsy.”
But didn’t the alleged autopsy
reportedly find broken neck bones that are more commonly associated with
strangulation murders than suicides? That controversy may have been scripted to
distract the public from an insider report on 4chan,
first published before the news of Epstein’s “suicide” broke, that Epstein had
been “switched out” of MCC. If so, the body with the broken neck bones wasn’t
Epstein’s.
The Epstein affair (like 9/11)
illustrates two critically important truths about Western secularism: there is
no truth, and there are no limits. A society that no longer believes in God no
longer believes in truth, since God is al-haqq, THE truth, without Whom the whole notion
of truth has no metaphysical basis. The postmodern
philosophers understand this perfectly well. They taught a whole generation of
Western humanities scholars that truth is merely a function of power: people
accept something as “true” to the extent that they are forced by power to
accept it. So when the most powerful people in the world insist that three
enormous steel-frame skyscrapers were blown to smithereens by relatively modest
office fires on 9/11, that absurd assertion becomes the official “truth” as
constructed by such Western institutions as governments, courts, media, and
academia. Likewise, the assertion that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide
under circumstances that render that assertion absurd will probably become the
official “truth” as recorded and promulgated by the West’s ruling institutions,
even though nobody will ever really believe it.
Epstein’s career as a shameless, openly-operating Mossad sexual
blackmailer—like the in-your-face 9/11 coup—also illustrates another core truth
of Western secularism: If there is no God, there are no limits (in this case,
to human depravity and what it can get away with). Or as Dostoevsky famously
put it: “If God does not exist, everything is permitted.” Since God alone can
establish metaphysically-grounded limits between what is permitted and what is
forbidden, a world without God will feature no such limits; in such a world
Aleister Crowley’s satanic motto “Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the
law” becomes the one and only commandment. In today’s Godless West, why should
men not “do
what they wilt” and indulge their libidos by raping young girls if they can get
away with it? After all, all the other sexual taboos are being broken, one by
one. Fornication, adultery, homosexuality, sadomasochism, gender-bending…all of
these have been transformed during my lifetime from crimes and vices to “human
rights” enjoyed by the most liberal and fashionable right-thinking Western
secularists. Even bestiality and necrophilia are poised to become normalized
“sexual identities” whose practitioners will soon be proudly marching in
“bestiality pride” and “necrophilia pride” parades. So why not normalize
pedophilia and other forms of rape perpetrated by the strong against the weak?
And why not add torture and murder in service to sexual gratification? After
all, the secret bible of the sexual identity movement is the collected works of
the Marquis de Sade, the satanic prophet of sexual liberation, with whom the
liberal progressivist secular West is finally catching up. It will not be
surprising if, just a few years after the Jeffrey Epstein “suicide” is
consigned to the memory hole, we will be witnessing LGBTQBNPR parades, with the
BNPR standing for bestiality, necrophilia, pedophilia, and rape. (It would have
been LGBTQBNPRG, with the final G standing for Gropers like President Trump,
except that the G was already taken by the gays.) The P’s, pioneers of
pedophile pride parades, will undoubtedly celebrate Jeffrey Epstein as an
ahead-of-his-time misunderstood hero who was unjustly persecuted on the basis
of his unusual sexual orientation.
It is getting harder and harder to satirize
the decadence and depravity of the secular West, which insists on parodying
itself with ever-increasing outlandishness. When the book on this once-mighty
civilization is written, and the ink is dry, readers will be astounded by the
limitless lies of the drunk-on-chutzpah psychopaths who ran it into the ground.
(Republished
from The Occidental Observer by
permission of author or representative)