As I have repeatedly observed, no matter how outlandish
their theories may be, the conspiracy theorists are reliably far too
conservative, as the historical reality is almost always
more horrifying than
the average individual is capable of imagining or even admitting:
VICTIMS of a warped
social experiment in Germany where authorities deliberately placed troubled
kids with paedophile foster parents are set to win compensation. Between 1969
to 2003, these homeless boys aged between six and 14 were handed over to
paedos — because it was thought the vulnerable kids might benefit from
their attention.
The twisted logic behind behind the "Kentler experiment"— named after the leading sexologist Helmut Kentler who spearheaded it — was that paedophilia could have "positive consequences". Astonishingly, in the late 1960s Kentler managed to persuade West Berlin's ruling Senate that homeless boys would leap at the opportunity to be fostered by paedophile dads. It was successfully argued they would be "head over heels in love" with their new father figures.
About this time Kentler was publicly lobbying for decriminalisation sex between adults and children in West Germany. The academic argued youngsters "almost always more seriously damaged" by their abusers being prosecuted than by the abuse itself.
The twisted logic behind behind the "Kentler experiment"— named after the leading sexologist Helmut Kentler who spearheaded it — was that paedophilia could have "positive consequences". Astonishingly, in the late 1960s Kentler managed to persuade West Berlin's ruling Senate that homeless boys would leap at the opportunity to be fostered by paedophile dads. It was successfully argued they would be "head over heels in love" with their new father figures.
About this time Kentler was publicly lobbying for decriminalisation sex between adults and children in West Germany. The academic argued youngsters "almost always more seriously damaged" by their abusers being prosecuted than by the abuse itself.
Don't be surprised when similar projects in
the USA and the UK are revealed. Adding P to the ever-growing sexual rights
acronym has always been the end game of the human rights movement. The wicked
will never, ever stop attempting to expand their so-called "rights" until
they are able to legally a) have sex with, and, b) openly murder, children
without fear of consequence or reprisal.
Once you understand that "the slippery slope" in this case is not a logical fallacy, but rather the straightforward observation of the step-by-step implementation of an oft-repeated process that has been attempted and resisted, implemented and eventually stamped-out, time and time again over the course of human history, you will understand why it should be stopped at the beginning of the process.
Once you understand that "the slippery slope" in this case is not a logical fallacy, but rather the straightforward observation of the step-by-step implementation of an oft-repeated process that has been attempted and resisted, implemented and eventually stamped-out, time and time again over the course of human history, you will understand why it should be stopped at the beginning of the process.