This article is intended for close
study. I urge you not to jump to an early conclusion about what I’m proposing
here. For example, I’m not ruling out the engineering of a virus. But an
unusual twist is involved.
This
article is also part of a larger position. That position can be defined as:
AUTOMATICALLY
ASSUMING THE SO-CALLED EPIDEMIC IS CAUSED BY A VIRUS IS INCORRECT.
THE TRUTH
DOESN’T SUPPORT FEAR.
FEAR IS
SELF-DEFEATING.
FEAR
CLOSES DOWN POSSIBILITY.
DON’T CLOSE DOWN POSSIBILITY IN
ANY ASPECT OF YOUR LIFE.
Among
other subjects, this article comments on the hypothesis that the COVID-19 virus
is a modified weaponized germ from a lab, either deliberately or accidentally
released.
A
general comment: weaponizing a virus as an instrument for causing widespread
destruction faces a significant barrier. From the get-go, viruses mutate very
quickly as they replicate. Therefore, the criminals wouldn’t maintain the viral
structure they started with. Ensuring continued lethality would therefore
appear to be impossible.
Then
there is this: I fully understand that researchers in certain labs are always
fiddling and diddling with viruses. That’s their job. The question, in a given
situation, is: are they successful at weaponization, even ignoring the rapid
mutation factor I just mentioned?
THERE IS A MAJOR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN: THEY
TRIED TO WEAPONIZE A CORONAVIRUS IN LABS, AND THEY SUCCEEDED AND RELEASED IT.
EVIDENCE FOR THE FORMER, NO MATTER HOW CONVINCING, IS NOT EVIDENCE OF THE
LATTER.
Anything
is possible, but so far, what I see is this: when I add up all the reasons
people are sick and dying, I don’t see a new germ as the basis.
I’ve
detailed, in past articles, all the Chinese cases who have been diagnosed for
no other reason than they have pneumonia, a traditional disease of major
proportions in China. Studies estimate that roughly 300,000 citizens die of it
every year. Which means there are millions of Chinese people who have develop
pneumonia each year. Furthermore, the Chinese government quickly abandoned the
idea of testing for the purported coronavirus—favoring instead, CT scans of the
lungs. A finding of pneumonia was sufficient for a diagnosis of an “epidemic
case.” That is absurd on
its face. Pneumonia has many causes, none of which requires a new virus.
Then
we have the cases in Italy, the second largest reservoir of the so-called
epidemic. Here, the deaths occur massively on the side of the elderly, who
already have serious prior medical conditions, long term. In the reports issued
by the Italian government so far, the people dying are said to “have the
virus,” but the conclusion is they’re dying because of their prior medical
conditions.
The
conventional wisdom, often spouted, is: “the coronavirus strikes the elderly,
who are less able than the young to ward it off.” This is a misnomer, deployed
to cover up the reality that the elderly are passing away, as they usually do,
from the illnesses they already have—no need for a new virus.
I’ve also discussed deaths in
Australia and the state of Washington. Again, it’s elderly people. As in Italy,
add up their long-term diseases; the treatment of those diseases with toxic
medical drugs; the fear engendered by the diagnosis of “COVID”; sudden
isolation from family and friends; the use of breathing ventilators, which have
their own set of adverse effects, including bacterial pneumonia; and new
treatment with toxic antiviral drugs, to “fight the virus”; and you have a
terribly potent array of factors which account for the elderly dying. No need
for a new virus.
Dissolving Illusions: ...Suzanne
Humphries MD, ...Best Price: $19.24Buy New $17.17(as
of 12:30 EST - Details)
As I’ve detailed in past articles,
flu-like diseases (quite often, with no evidence of a flu virus) are
traditional in Europe and the US. Their symptoms overlap the symptoms listed
for so-called COVID. In recent years, there have been huge numbers of such people
with these flu-like illnesses, and many have died—before the emergence of the
so-called COVID virus. Again, no need for a unique new virus.
And as far as overall global
case numbers of COVID are concerned, a large percentage of these people have
been diagnosed purely on the basis of their symptoms, with no test, or via the
accepted diagnostic test, called PCR. I’ll cover that test in a moment. Suffice
to say, it fails to prove illness is stemming from COVID virus or any virus—but
it does create a picture of supposedly swelling case numbers. In a recent article,
I’ve quoted the literature of official public health authorities, who
themselves admit the test has fatal flaws.
Then
we have unexplained relatively small clusters of people who appear to be
suddenly falling ill. A closer examination of these people is necessary, to see
whether they, in fact, ARE “sudden and unexplained.” If they are, I would
suggest investigating whether the rollout of new 5G wireless technology at
60GHz is occurring in those locales. It is possible 5G is causing oxygen
deprivation, among other serious effects. And rather than an engineered virus—which
has unpredictable effects owing to its rapid mutation—if we’re looking for
sinister operations, I suggest that, to cause sensational alarm and bafflement
and “proof” that a mysterious event is underway, the intentional seeding of
locales with little-known toxic chemicals would be the action undertaken. The
effects of chemicals are far more predictable in terms of intensity and
duration, and if no one is specifically looking for them, they are
undetectable.
Finally, in major cities of China (e.g.,
Wuhan) and Italy (particularly in the north), highly toxic air quality has been
far more than “a serious problem” for some years. This alone would account for
huge numbers of people suffering from all sorts of lung conditions, including
pneumonia. Pneumonia is one of the cardinal listed symptoms of the “epidemic.”
In China, the mix of toxic pollutants in the air is unprecedented in human
history, spanning both early and modern eras of industrialization.
Conclusion:
All in all, I would say that, if a weaponized coronavirus has been achieved,
and then released or accidentally leaked, it is not a success. Far too much of
what is being called COVID is explained by the causative factors I’ve just
presented.
In fact, if we want to talk about engineered viruses—including what would
probably be an easier technical job in the lab—the most successful operation
would involve slightly altering a common coronavirus to cause nothing more than
a common cold. Then, with a “self-fulfilling prophecy” diagnostic test in hand,
people all over the world would test positive; many case numbers would thus be
created; and with the non-virus illness-causes I’ve just described, the
illusion of a global pandemic would be stitched together—all leading to the
real goal: LOCKDOWNS, economic destruction, and the further pacification of the
population. A bereft population more dependent than ever on governments and
official authorities. A dazed population guided into a heavily technocratic
future—wall to wall surveillance, smart cities, Internet of Things, universal
guaranteed income tied to social credit score. Most importantly: Assigned
energy quotas for every citizen. CONTROL.
Moving on from biowar labs to ordinary labs, has the COVID virus ever
actually been DISCOVERED and isolated there by proper procedures? As
I’ve written in another article, COVID-19 lacks correct proof in that regard.
What I believe is the best method for that job—traditional electron microscope
studies on HUNDREDS OF PATIENTS, in a side-by-side controlled test—was never
done at the outset. This is convenient, to say the least, if in fact a common
coronavirus has been engineered to cause nothing more than a cold. The absence
of true isolation and discovery permits such a virus to slip in under the
radar.
The
widespread diagnostic test for the COVID virus now in use, called the PCR,
falls far short of proving that ANY person is sick or will get sick. In
other articles, I have
proposed a vetting process for the PCR—which should have been done decades
ago—in order to show it works or doesn’t work in the real world. This vetting
procedure would be suggested by any college science student as obvious and
necessary. It has never been carried out. It involves proving the test
can determine that a huge quantity of virus, actively replicating in the human
body, is present—and therefore, the patient would, in the real world, be sick.
Carrying out such a test, on hundreds of patients, in a controlled and blinded
setting, AND THEN SEEING WHETHER THE TEST DOES POINT TO ACTUALLY SICK PEOPLE,
has never been done. Therefore, claiming the test confirms that COVID virus is
causing great damage is unsupported. This, too, is quite convenient, if a
common coronavirus that causes nothing more than a common cold has been
engineered. In that situation, you would want a diagnostic test that can’t
predict or detect serious illness, because the virus doesn’t cause serious
illness. The virus is only there as a prop, to create the illusion of case
numbers stemming from one source: a harmless COVID-19 VIRUS.
Now,
let’s move on to the effects of propaganda.
People
say: patients are sick and dying all over the world—so IT MUST BE THE VIRUS.
WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE? Aristotle worked out the fact that the effect does not
prove the cause. The effect (people sick and dying) does not prove the cause
(COVID virus).
And
history matters. It offers clues and precedents. We’ve seen dud epidemics in
the past blamed on a virus, and yet, embarrassingly, the virus couldn’t be
found. BUT WHO CARES, PEOPLE SAY, moved by propaganda. IT MUST BE THE VIRUS.
(See my articles on SARS and Swine Flu 2009.)
—People
sick, people dying. How many people? Unknown. Massive lockdowns of Chinese
cities. Citizens trying to escape. For the global audience, this equals
coronavirus, not because they know the virus is the cause—proof is beside the
point. The virus is the cause because IT MUST BE. WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE?
When
brutal air pollution in Wuhan obviously brings on lung disease; and when the
primary symptom of the coronavirus is supposed to be lung disease; and when
citizens of the city have been falling ill and dying from lung disease long
before the virus appeared—does this matter?
OF COURSE NOT. IT MUST BE THE VIRUS.
Propaganda.
When
governments and corporations have been using THE VIRUS as a cover story to
obscure and explain away their crimes against populations, for decades and
decades—does this matter?
When previous so-called epidemics—for
example, West Nile, SARS, Zika, and Swine Flu—turned out to be complete
unproven duds—does this history matter?
OF
COURSE NOT. IT HAS TO BE THE VIRUS. WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE?
A face on
a television screen watched by millions of people says CORONAVIRUS. Therefore,
case closed.
In
2009, in La Gloria, Mexico, on a giant commercial pig farm, pig feces and urine
are allowed to bake and steam and bubble in the sun. These deposits are called
lagoons. They’re so large, you can see them from outer space. Toxic chemicals
are routinely sprayed and laid out like whipped cream on the lagoons. Workers
are falling ill. New workers are brought in to spray even more toxic chemicals.
Workers die. Then the Centers for Disease Control sends in their tuned-up virus
hunters to look for the germ causing the “mysterious” illness. They claim to
find a Swine Flu virus. IT MUST BE THE VIRUS. WHAT ELSE COULD IT BE? THE
DECAYING PIG SHIT AND URINE? The layers of poisonous chemicals? Don’t be
ridiculous.
Later, in the summer of 2009, CBS
investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson discovers that the overwhelming
percentage of tissue samples from US Swine Flu patients are coming back from
labs with no sign of ANY KIND OF FLU. The virus isn’t there.
And
yet, of course, we have this, written in the summer of 2009: From
healthwyze.org: “The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has a patent for,
Genetically Engineered Swine Influenza Virus and Uses Thereof (patent
#8124101). It was filed in 2005 for approval. The makers of the human variant
of the swine flu virus waited until the patent was finally approved in January
of 2009, before unleashing the virus into the wild. The makers of the swine flu
vaccine had begun the lengthy patenting process long before the swine flu
supposedly existed, which means that the outbreak was no accident, and the
virus is clearly not natural. Patents only apply to man-made items, and natural
things cannot be patented. The
virus conveniently went public only after its vaccine patent was approved,
after patiently waiting 3 years for that to happen. The pandemic was declared
just five months after the patent was approved, in June of 2009. The tremendous
hysteria following the outbreak was promoted by the same groups who had
invented this genetically engineered virus. The word ‘invented’ was actually
used to describe the virus in the patent application.”
What
do you know about that? Back then, there were reports that the Swine Flu
Virus—which couldn’t even be found in the overwhelmingly number of US
patients—was actually a biowarfare germ. Sound familiar? Swine Flu was a DUD.
Another
epidemic that was going to infect the world? West Nile Virus. Another dud. But
here from an old whale.to article: “None of these theories [about West Nile] has
deterred Vermont Senator Patrick Leahy from urging federal officials to
determine if the introduction of WN virus is a terrorist attack. On September
12, 2002, Leahy declared: ‘I think we have to ask ourselves: Is it a
coincidence that we’re seeing such an increase in WN virus – or is that
something that’s being tested as a biological weapon against us’.” Sound
familiar?
And
here, from an old article at rediff.com, a piece about another epidemic dud,
SARS 2003 (800 people died out of 7 billion, and WHO researcher, Frank Plummer,
told the press they couldn’t even find the virus in all but a few Canadian
patients): “The virus of atypical pneumonia, better known as SARS, or Severe
Acute Respiratory Syndrome, was created artificially, possibly as a bacteriological
weapon, Sergei Kolesnikov, academician of the Russian Academy of Medical
Sciences, told a press conference in the Siberian town of Irkutsk on Thursday,
the Russian RIA Novosti news agency reported.”
“According
to Kolesnikov, the virus of atypical pneumonia is a synthesis of the viruses of
measles and infectious parotiditis or mumps, the natural compound of which is
impossible. This can be done only in a laboratory, he said.”
“Kolesnikov
added that in creating bacteriological weapons, a protective anti-viral vaccine
is, as a rule, worked out at the same time, so a medicine for atypical
pneumonia may soon appear.”
“He
did not, however, rule out the possibility that the virus could have spread
accidentally as a result of “an unsanctioned leakage” from a biological weapons
laboratory.”
Sound
familiar? And yet the “epidemic” was a dud.
I would take these duds, and the
concomitant warnings of engineered pandemic viruses, as further evidence that,
if any engineering was going on, it was the “lite” version I’ve described in
reference to COVID-19: the duds were previous attempts to stitch together the
illusion of a pandemic—attempts that fell short of success, or were designed as
smaller test runs leading up to what we have now.
The
ceaseless propaganda promoting “deadly viruses” is essential to creating the
pandemic illusion…and sometimes you can see through the illusion in graphic
terms. Quite, quite clearly. In 1987, a doctor calls me, while I’m writing my
first book, AIDS INC. He tells me he’s built a small AIDS clinic where a group
of poverty-stricken patients can rest in clean surroundings, eat nutritious
food, and grow beans and sell them for a small amount of money. This doctor is
mainstream. He’s given his patients no medical treatment. He knows that THE VIRUS,
HIV, is said to be a remorseless killer. But, he tells me, all his patients
have recovered; they no longer have symptoms. They’re healthy. He’s puzzled,
confused, and distraught. He asks me, “What should I do next?” He knows the
AIDS drugs are highly toxic. He senses that giving them to his now-healthy
patients would bring on a disaster. Oh but you see, according to the propaganda
masquerading as science, IT MUST BE THE VIRUS. WHAT ELSE COULD BE CAUSING THESE
PEOPLE TO BECOME SICK IN THE FIRST PLACE? Drinking the water in their
villages—water mixed directly with sewage? Hunger? Starvation? Toxic vaccines
pushing their depleted immune systems over the edge of the cliff? Don’t be
ridiculous. IT MUST BE HIV.
In an interview, a famous New York doctor
tells me all scientists agree that HIV is the cause of AIDS because, well, the
scientists who don’t agree can’t get their findings published. He’s telling me
all VISIBLE scientists agree.
Several
years ago, during the Zika virus hysteria (another dud epidemic, of
microcephaly, that surely would “decimate populations”), researchers in the
epicenter, in Brazil, report that only between 10 and 15 percent of Zika
patients have any trace of the virus—they can’t find it in the other patients.
This amounts to a bald confession that Zika is eliminated as the cause of
disease in pregnant women. But no one listens. IT MUST BE THE VIRUS. WHAT ELSE
COULD IT BE?
Well,
it turns out it could be ANY INJURY OF ANY KIND TO A PREGNANT MOTHER—causing
her baby to be born with a smaller head and brain damage, called microcephaly.
But
here, in a 2016 article from thesleuthjournal.com, we have this: “It’s [Zika
virus] being spread by genetically engineered mosquitos. Is it the latest
example of US biowarfare? America’s sordid history suggests it.”
If it was being spread in that fashion,
it wasn’t working to cause disease. It was a failure. But as propaganda, it was
a success.
And
of course, the World Health organization hit the hysteria button at the time
with their own brand of propaganda. From marketwatch.com, January 28, 2016:
“The World Health Organization will convene an emergency committee in Geneva on
Monday to discuss the mosquito-borne Zika virus, which the organization’s head
said is spreading ‘explosively’ and which many doctors and health officials
believe is linked to an unprecedented outbreak of babies born with small heads
in Brazil…’The level of alarm is extremely high,’ WHO Director-General Margaret
Chan said in remarks to the public-health agency’s executive board…WHO’s announcement
underscores the speed with which a virus that began as an obscure tropical
malady afflicting Africa and then several remote Western Pacific islands has
transformed into a major international health concern, particularly in the
Americas.”
Dud.
If WHO could squeeze out more fear, NOW, in 2020, about an ever-expanding Zika
crisis, don’t you think they would? Even THEY’VE given up the ghost on that
campaign. Meaning: they achieved their goal of creating alarm and public
acceptance of THE VIRUS one more time. No need to go further for the moment.
The key event in the current COVID
operation was the sudden Chinese government lockdown of 50 million citizens
overnight in three major cities. That was the signal the CDC and the World
Health Organization received with open arms.
“Well, they broke the ice. This is what
we’ve been waiting for. This is now a model we can sell. Lockdowns on a massive
scale.”
And they did sell it.
As I discovered in 1987, when I was
researching AIDS, the basic epidemic con involves grouping all sorts of people
and groups who are suffering from different traditional diseases, environmental
toxicities, and certain new NON-VIRUS conditions UNDER ONE UMBRELLA LABEL. And
then saying they’re all sick because of one virus. That is the central
illusion.
Finally, I need to make a general
comment about the effects of viruses on humans. These effects have been vastly
overrated. Consider the proponents of the so-called “hot zone” hypothesis. For
many years, they’ve claimed that viruses coming out of rainforests and
traveling, in the modern age, to distant countries would cause horrific
consequences—in the form of a cascade of MANY new diseases.
Why? Because the immune systems of
people, unacquainted with these novel germs, would lack the capacity to ward
them off. But that prediction has not come to pass.
The hot zone advocates have also failed
to mention that the reverse vector of travel should also result in massive
epidemics: in other words, viruses which are routinely carried by Americans and
Europeans—and cause them no harm—should be decimating native peoples in
rainforests, since the “more civilized” people travel in great numbers into
jungles. The decimation has not come to pass. Native peoples have been uprooted
and damaged by industry, but they haven’t been wiped out by American or
European viruses.
In fact, when you think about it, all
countries and locales tend to have their own viruses which are endemic and
harmless to locals, but when carried to other lands, should be wreaking havoc.
But they aren’t. We should all be dead
many times over. But we aren’t.
The hot zone fear stories should also
be dead by now. But they still attract adherents.
Reprinted with permission
from Jon Rappoport’s blog.
Jon
Rappoport runs No More Fake News. The author of an explosive
collection, The Matrix Revealed, Jon was a candidate for a
US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a
Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years,
writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA
Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe.
Copyright © Jon Rappoport
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/jon-rappoport/people-dying-equals-coronavirus-an-engineered-virus/