The reason for the hoax is obvious. Medical dictators must squeeze
out every possible number they can, by any means, to justify their rampant
economic and, thus, human destruction.
The lockdowns and
shutdowns have nothing to do with disease.
Also—case numbers sell
vaccines, and selling vaccines is the CDC’s main business activity.
“We’ve checked your equipment,
and we believe you’ll be safe, even though you’re stepping into an alien
environment. Remember, the denizens you’ll encounter are congenital tricksters.
They live on lies. They eat them. They broadcast them. They worship them in
their Hades.” (My notes for “The Underground”)
So once again, we don hazmat suits and
enter the mad, mad world of basic COVID lies. For purposes of argument only, we
assume a new coronavirus was actually discovered, the diagnostic test is
meaningful, and case numbers are also meaningful.
Within that mad world, the amount of fraud
is still immense.
Best Price: $7.50Buy
New $12.99(as of 06:30 EST - Details)
As I’ve documented, all sorts of case-number cons are running loose.
Little, medium, and large cons. Entering “COVID” on all test results from labs.
Oops. Computer error. The PCR test itself spits out false-positives because it
lights up like a Christmas tree when it encounters various irrelevant germs.
And so forth and so on.
But
here is a superhighway version of fake number counting. By definition. Written
in stone. Institutionalized. From the twinkle-toe mavens at the CDC, home of
numbers, house of cards. Read on.
The revelatory reference is:
Children’s Health Defense, July 24, “If COVID Fatalities Were 90.2%
Lower, How Would You Feel About Schools Reopening?” By H.
Ealy, M. McEvoy, M. Sava, S. Gupta, D. Chong, D. White, J. Nowicki, P.
Anderson.
“Had the
CDC used its industry standard, Medical Examiners’ and Coroners’ Handbook on
Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting Revision 2003, as it has for all
other causes of death for the last 17 years, the COVID-19 fatality count would
be approximately 90.2% lower than it currently is.”
The
article is somewhat complex. It should be studied carefully. Here is my main
takeaway:
The special CDC guidelines for labeling
patients “COVID” are absurd. These rules open the door to falsely inflating
case and death numbers. This is more than fiddling with statistics. It’s an
institutional and official invitation to create fake cases. Gigantic numbers of
them.
The
Children’s Health Defense article presents the April 2020 CDC guidelines for
diagnosing COVID. There are five sets of criteria presented. Grit your teeth
and study this CDC web of deceit:
“April
14th, 2020 – CDC Adopts CSTE Interim-20-ID-01
Title:
Standardized surveillance case definition and national notification for 2019
novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19)
VII. Case Definition for Case
Classification
Honigsbaum, MarkBest
Price: $14.72Buy New $14.72(as of 04:53 EDT - Details)
1.
Narrative: Description of criteria to determine how a case should be
classified.
A1.
Clinical Criteria At least two of the following symptoms:
*
fever (measured or subjective), chills, rigors, myalgia, headache, sore throat,
new olfactory and taste disorder(s) OR
* At least one of the following symptoms: cough, shortness of breath, or
difficulty breathing OR
* Severe respiratory illness with at least one of the following:
* * Clinical or radiographic evidence of pneumonia, or
* * Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). AND
* * No alternative more likely diagnosis
A2.
Laboratory Criteria Laboratory evidence using a method approved or authorized
by the FDA or designated authority:
Confirmatory
laboratory evidence:
*
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a clinical specimen using a molecular
amplification detection test
Presumptive
laboratory evidence:
*
Detection of specific antigen in a clinical specimen
* Detection of specific antibody in serum, plasma, or whole blood indicative of
a new or recent infection (note1)
(note1) serologic methods for
diagnosis are currently being defined
Chomsky, NoamBest
Price: $10.99Buy New $13.53(as of 11:05 EST - Details)
A3.
Epidemiologic Linkage One or more of the following exposures in the 14 days
before onset of symptoms:
*
Close contact (note2) with a confirmed or probable case of COVID-19 disease; or
* Close contact (note2) with a person with:
* * clinically compatible illness AND
* * linkage to a confirmed case of COVID-19 disease.
* Travel to or residence in an area with sustained, ongoing community
transmission of SARS-CoV2.
* Member of a risk cohort as defined by public health authorities during an
outbreak.
(note2)
Close contact is defined as being within 6 feet for at least a period of 10
minutes to 30 minutes or more depending upon the exposure. In healthcare
settings, this may be defined as exposures of greater than a few minutes or
more. Data are insufficient to precisely define the duration of exposure that
constitutes prolonged exposure and thus a close contact.
A4.
Vital Records Criteria A death certificate that lists COVID-19 disease or
SARS-CoV-2 as a cause of death or a significant condition contributing to
death.
A5.
Case Classifications
Confirmed:
*
Meets confirmatory laboratory evidence.
Probable:
* Meets clinical criteria AND
epidemiologic evidence with no confirmatory laboratory testing performed for
COVID-19.
Garrett, Mr. Gregory L...Buy
New $26.94(as of 05:21 EDT - Details)
* Meets presumptive
laboratory evidence AND either clinical criteria OR epidemiologic evidence.
* Meets vital records criteria with no confirmatory laboratory testing
performed for COVID19.
1.
Criteria to distinguish a new case of this disease or condition from reports or
notifications which should not be enumerated as a new case for surveillance
* N/A
until more virologic data are available”
If you waded through that CDC ball of
fraud, you see how easy it is to work a deception in COVID case-counting and
death-number counting.
For
example: chills and fever, or cough, are sufficient to label a patient a
probable case of “COVID, if he was also in contact with a “risk cohort,” as
defined by public health authorities.
This
means an elderly person living in a nursing home—the whole home would be a
“risk cohort”—who coughs, or who has chills and fever, could be diagnosed, with
no test, as a probable case of COVID.
The reason for the hoax is obvious.
Medical dictators must squeeze out every possible number they can, by any
means, to justify their rampant economic and, thus, human destruction.
The lockdowns and shutdowns have
nothing to do with disease.
Also—case numbers sell vaccines, and
selling vaccines is the CDC’s main business activity.
Reprinted with permission
from Jon
Rappoport’s blog.
Jon
Rappoport runs No More Fake News. The author of an explosive
collection, The Matrix Revealed, Jon was a candidate for a
US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a
Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years,
writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA
Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe.
Copyright © Jon Rappoport
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/08/jon-rappoport/covid-case-numbers-far-lower-than-claimed/