The video announcement1,2,3,4 above by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich5 is long, but I strongly recommend listening to it in its entirety. Fuellmich has been a consumer protection trial lawyer in California and Germany6 for 26 years and is one of four founding members of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss7),8,9 launched July 10, 2020.
The
other three founding members, all lawyers, are Viviane Fischer, Antonia Fischer
and Justus P. Hoffmann, Ph.D.10 Fuellmich
is heading up the committee’s corona crisis tort case. All meetings are
live-streamed and available on the Committee’s YouTube channel11 (at
least for now).
According
to Fuellmich, an international class-action lawsuit will be filed against those
responsible for implementing the economically devastating lockdowns around the
world, as well as using fraudulent testing to engineer the appearance of a
dangerous pandemic.Ortleb, CharlesBuy New $5.99(as
of 02:55 EDT - Details)
This includes everyone from
local policy makers all the way to the World Health Organization and drug
companies. He claims more than 50 other countries will be following suit.
“I
have been practicing law primarily as a trial lawyer against fraudulent corporations
such as Deutsche bank, formerly one of the world’s largest and most respected
banks, today one of the most toxic criminal organizations in the world;
VW,
one of the world’s largest and most respected car manufacturers, today
notorious for its giant diesel fraud; and Cunard and Niagara the world’s
largest shipping company. We’re suing them in a multi-million-dollar bribery
case,” Fuellmich says.
“All
the above-mentioned cases of corruption and fraud committed by the German
corporations pale in comparison in view of the extent of the damage that the
corona crisis has caused and continues to cause. This corona crisis, according
to all we know today, must be renamed a corona scandal; and those responsible
for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages.”
Exposing
Corrupt Agendas
Fuellmich stresses that, on a
political level, all-out efforts must be made to ensure “that no one will ever
again be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity, or to
attempt to manipulate us with their corrupt agendas.”
To
that end, the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee will be working with
an international network of lawyers to argue the most massive tort case ever —
a case Fuellmich describes as “probably the greatest crime against humanity
ever committed.”Nussbaum, BruceCheck Amazon for Pricing.
As explained by Fuellmich,
crimes against humanity, first defined during the Nuremberg trials following
World War II, are today regulated in Section 7 of the International Criminal
Code. The three questions the committee seeks to answer through judicial means
are:
1.Is
there a COVID-19 pandemic or is there only a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
test pandemic?
Specifically, does a positive
PCR test result mean that the individual is infected with SARS-CoV-2 and has
COVID-19, or does it mean absolutely nothing in connection with the COVID-19
infection?
2.Do
pandemic response measures such as lockdowns, mask mandates, social distancing
and quarantine regulations serve to protect the world’s population from
COVID-19, or do these measures serve only to make people panic?
Are these measures intended
to sow “panic in order to make people believe, without asking any questions,
that their lives are in danger, so that the pharmaceutical and tech industries
can generate huge profits from the sale of PCR tests, antigen and antibody
tests and vaccines, as well as the harvesting of our genetic fingerprints?”
3.Is
it true that the German government was massively lobbied — more so than any
other country — by the chief protagonists of this COVID-19 pandemic?
According
to Fuellmich, Germany “is known as a particularly
disciplined country and was therefore to become a role model for the rest of
the world for its strict and, of course, successful adherence” to pandemic
measures.
Answers to these questions
are urgently needed, he says, because SARS-CoV-2, which is touted as one of the
most serious threats to life in modern history, “has not caused any excess
mortality anywhere in the world.”
Pandemic measures, on the
other hand, have “caused the loss of innumerable human lives, and have
destroyed the economic existence of countless companies and individuals
worldwide,” Fuellmich says.
He
points out that in Australia, residents are now thrown into prison if they do
not comply with mask rules, and in the Philippines, people can be shot dead if
they defy lockdown orders or don’t wear a mask.12,13 During
the first week of April 2020, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte announced he
would “not hesitate” to kill anyone challenging his pandemic restrictions:14,15
“I
will not hesitate. My orders are to the police and military, as well as village
officials, if there is any trouble, or occasions where there’s violence and
your lives are in danger, shoot them dead.
Is
that understood? Dead. Instead of causing trouble, I will bury you. Do not
intimidate the government. Do not challenge the government. You will lose,” Duterte
said.
Mikovits,
JudyBest Price: $29.55Buy New $17.99(as
of 04:10 EDT - Details)
This
hardly seems to be a strategy aimed at preserving life. Fuellmich goes on to
present “the facts as they present themselves,” based on expert testimony
collected by the committee so far.
The
German Congress on Global Health
According to Fuellmich, in
May 2019, and again in early 2020, the Christian Democratic Union (CDU) of
Germany held a congress on global health. In addition to political leaders,
including Mr. Tedros Adhanom, head of the WHO, and German health officials,
speeches were also given by chief lobbyists of the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation and the Wellcome Trust.
“Less
than a year later these very people called the shots in the proclamation of the
worldwide corona pandemic, made sure that mass PCR tests were used to prove
mass infections with COVID-19 all over the world, and are now pushing for
vaccines to be invented and sold worldwide,” Fuellmich
says.
“These
infections, or rather the positive test results that the PCR tests delivered,
in turn became the justification for worldwide lockdowns, social distancing and
mandatory face masks.”
He also points out that the
very definition of “pandemic” was altered 12 years ago. Originally, a pandemic
was defined as a disease that spread worldwide, resulting in widespread serious
illness and deaths. Twelve years ago, the definition was changed to reflect a
disease that spreads worldwide only. “Many serious illnesses and many deaths
were not required anymore, to announce a pandemic,” he says.
The
Swine Flu Pandemic That Wasn’t
This
change to the definition of a pandemic is what allowed the WHO to declare the
swine flu a pandemic in June 2009,16 which
resulted in the sale of many millions of dollars of fast-tracked swine flu
vaccines. Within months, cases of disability and death from the H1N1 vaccine were
reported in various parts of the world.
In
the aftermath, the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) questioned
the WHO’s handling of the pandemic. In June 2010, PACE concluded “the handling
of the pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO), EU health agencies and
national governments led to a ‘waste of large sums of public money, and
unjustified scares and fears about the health risks faced by the European
public.'”17
Specifically, PACE concluded
there was “overwhelming evidence that the seriousness of the pandemic was
vastly overrated by WHO,” and that the drug industry had influenced the
organization’s decision-making.
A
joint investigation by the British
Medical Journal and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ) also uncovered
serious conflicts of interest between the WHO — which promoted the global
vaccination agenda — and the drug companies that created those vaccines.18 As
noted by Fuellmich:Mullis, KaryBest Price: $5.52Buy New $15.17(as
of 02:58 EDT - Details)
“These
vaccines proved to be completely unnecessary because the swine flu eventually
turned out to be a mild flu and never became the horrific plague that the
pharmaceutical industry and its affiliated universities kept announcing it
would turn into, with millions of deaths certain to happen, if people didn’t
get vaccinated.
These
vaccines also led to serious health problems: about 700 children in Europe fell
incurably ill with narcolepsy and are now forever severely disabled. The
vaccines bought with millions of taxpayers’ money had to be destroyed, with
even more taxpayers’ money.”
The
Virologist Responsible for Germany’s Lockdown Orders
One
of the characters that drummed up panic in 2009 with his doomsday prophesies
was German virologist Christian Drosten, head of the Institute of Virology at
the University of Bonn Medical Centre, best known for developing the first
diagnostic test for SARS in 2003. He also developed a diagnostic test for the
swine flu.19
Drosten spoke at the 2019 CDU
congress on global health, and according to Fuellmich, when it came time to
decide on a response for COVID-19, the German government relied on the opinion
of Drosten alone.
“In
an outrageous violation of the universally accepted principle audiator at ultra
parse, which means that one must also hear the other side, the only person they
listened to was Mr. Drosten, that is, the very person whose horrific panic-inducing
prognosis had proved to be catastrophically false 12 years earlier,” Fuellmich
says.
Meanwhile, many “highly
renowned scientists” painted a completely different picture of the COVID-19
pandemic. Among them, professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University in
California; professor Michael Levitt, a biophysicist at Stanford University and
Nobel prize winner for chemistry; German professors Karin Mulling, Sucharit
Bhakdi, Klud Wittkowski and Stefan Homburg.
Dr.
Mike Yeadon, former vice president and scientific director of Pfizer, is also
on this list. Yeadon recently went on record stating “there is no science to
suggest a second wave should happen,” and that false positive results from
unreliable PCR tests are being used to “manufacture a ‘second wave’ based on
‘new cases.'”20
“They
assumed, and still do assume, that there was no disease that went beyond the
gravity of the seasonal flu; that the population had already acquired cross or
T-cell immunity against this allegedly new virus; and that there was therefore
no reason for any special measures and certainly not for vaccinations,” Fuellmich
says.
He
also quotes21 from a scientific paper published in September 2020 by
Yeadon and colleagues, in which they state:Mikovits, JudyBuy
New $16.51(as of 02:59 EDT - Details)
“We’re
basing our government policy, our economic policy and the policy of restricting
fundamental rights presumably on completely wrong data and assumptions about
the coronavirus. If it weren’t for the test results that are constantly
reported in the media, the pandemic would be over, because nothing really
happened.”
Situational
Analysis
Commenting on “the current,
actual situation regarding the virus’s danger; the complete uselessness of PCR
tests for the detection of infections; and the lockdowns based on nonexistent
infections,” Fuellmich states:
“We
know that the health care systems were never in danger of becoming overwhelmed
by COVID-19. On the contrary, many hospitals remain empty to this day and some
are now facing bankruptcy. The hospital ship Comfort which anchored in New York
at the time, and could have accommodated a thousand patients, never
accommodated more than some 20 patients.
Nowhere
was there any excess mortality. Studies carried out by Professor Ioannidis and others
have shown that the mortality of corona is equivalent to that of the seasonal
flu; even the pictures from Bergamo and New York that were used to
demonstrate to the world that panic was in order proved to be deliberately
misleading.
Then,
the so-called ‘panic paper’ was leaked which was written by the German
Department of the Interior. Its classified content shows beyond a shadow of a
doubt that in fact the population was deliberately driven to panic by
politicians and mainstream media.
The
accompanying irresponsible statements of the head of the RKI, remember the CDC,
Mr. Wieler who repeatedly and excitedly announced that the corona measures must
be followed unconditionally by the population, without them asking any question
shows that he followed the script verbatim.
In
his public statements, he kept announcing that the situation was very grave and
threatening although the figures compiled by his own institute proved the exact
opposite. Among other things, the panic paper calls for children to be made to
feel responsible, and I quote, ‘for the painful tortured death of their parents
and grandparents if they do not follow the corona rules.'”
Fuellmich goes on to cite
data showing that in Bergamo, Italy, 94% of deaths were not the result of
COVID-19 infection spreading wild but, rather, the consequence of the
government’s decision to transfer sick patients from hospitals to nursing
homes, where they spread infection — colds, flu and SARS-CoV-2 — among the old
and frail.
This
was also done by New York Governor Andrew Cuomo,22 in
direct violation of federal guidelines,23 as
well as in Minnesota, Ohio,24 Pennsylvania, New
Jersey, Michigan and California.25 Fuellmich also points
out the routine malpractice that occurred in some New York
hospitals, where all suspected COVID-19 patients were placed on
mechanical ventilation, which turned out to be a death sentence.Best
Price: $7.50Buy New $12.99(as of 06:30 EST - Details)
“Again,
to clarify, COVID-19 … is a dangerous disease, just like the seasonal flu is a
dangerous disease, and of course COVID-19, just like the seasonal flu, may
sometimes take a severe clinical course and will sometimes kill
patients,” Fuellmich says.
“However,
as autopsies have shown, which were carried out in Germany, in particular by
the forensic scientist Professor Klaus Püschel in Hamburg, the fatalities he
examined had almost all been caused by serious pre-existing conditions and
almost all of the people who had died, had died at a very old age, just like in
Italy, meaning they had lived beyond their average life expectancy.
In
this context, the following should also be mentioned: the German RKI, that is
again the equivalent of the CDC, had initially, strangely enough, recommended
that no autopsies be performed and there are numerous credible reports that
doctors and hospitals worldwide had been paid money for declaring a deceased
person a victim of COVID-19 rather than writing down the true cause of death on
the death certificate, for example a heart attack or a gunshot wound.
Without
the autopsies, we would never know that the overwhelming majority of the
alleged COVID-19 victims had died of completely different diseases but not of
COVID-19.“
Lockdowns
Were and Are Unnecessary
Based on the expert testimony
collected so far by Fuellmich and his colleagues, lockdowns were unnecessary,
and any claim to the contrary is wrong. The three reasons for this are:
1. Lockdowns
were imposed at a time when the virus was already in retreat and infection
rates were starting to decline
2. Scientific
evidence shows a majority of people already have built-in protection against
the virus due to cross-reactive T cell immunity from
exposure to cold and flu viruses26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35
3. The
PCR test — which is being used as a gauge of infection rates and a
justification for restrictive measures — “do not give any indication of an
infection with any virus let alone an infection with SARS-CoV-2”
To
the politicians, who believe those corrupt people, these facts are hereby
offered as a lifeline, that can help you readjust your course of action and
start the long overdue public scientific discussion and not go down with those
charlatans and criminals. ~ Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
The
PCR Test Fraud
First of all, the PCR test
have not been approved for diagnostic purposes. Its inventor, Kary Mullis, has
repeatedly yet unsuccessfully stressed that this test should not be used as a
diagnostic tool. As noted by Fuellmich:
“[PCR
tests] are simply incapable of diagnosing any disease … A positive PCR test
result does not mean that an infection is present. If someone tests positive,
it does not mean that they’re infected with anything, let alone with the
contagious SARS-CoV-2 virus. Even the United States CDC … agrees with this and
I quote directly from page 38 of one of its publications on the coronavirus and
the PCR tests dated July 13 2020:36
- Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of
infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical
symptoms.
- The performance of this test has not been established for
monitoring treatment of 2019-nCoV infection.
- This test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial
or viral pathogens.
The
PCR swabs take one or two sequences of a molecule that are invisible to the
human eye and therefore need to be amplified in many cycles to make it visible.
Everything over 35 cycles is … considered completely unreliable and
scientifically unjustifiable.
However,
the Drosten test as well as the WHO recommended tests … are set to 45 cycles.
Can that be because of the desire to produce as many positive results as
possible and thereby provide the basis for the false assumption that a large
number of infections have been detected?”
Equally important is the fact
that PCR tests cannot distinguish between inactive viruses and “live” or
reproductive ones. As a result, they may pick up dead debris or inactive viral
particles that pose no risk whatsoever to the patient and others. What’s more,
the test can pick up the presence of other coronaviruses, so a positive result
may simply indicate that you’ve recuperated from a common cold in the past.
“Even
Drosten himself declared in an interview with a German business magazine in
2014 … that these PCR tests are so highly sensitive that even very healthy and
non-infectious people may test positive,” Fuellmich notes.
“In
my view, it is completely implausible that [Drosten] forgot in 2020 what he
knew about the PCR tests and told the business magazine in 2014. In short, this
test cannot detect any infection, contrary to all false claims stating that it
can.
An
infection, a so-called hot infection, requires that the virus … penetrates into
the cells, replicates there and causes symptoms such as headaches or a sore
throat. Only then is a person really infected, in the sense of a hot infection;
because only then is a person contagious, that is, able to infect others.
Until
then it is completely harmless for both the host and all other people that the
host comes into contact with … A number of
highly respected scientists worldwide assume that there has never been a corona
pandemic but only a PCR test pandemic …
Dr.
Yeadon, in agreement with the professors of immunology, Camera from Germany,
Capel from the Netherlands and Cahill from Ireland as well as a microbiologist,
Dr. Harvey from Austria, all of whom testified before the German corona
committee, explicitly points out that a positive test does not mean that an
intact virus has been found.”
In
the September 20, 2020 article37 “Lies, Damned Lies and
Health Statistics — The Deadly Danger of False Positives,” Yeadon details the
problems with basing our pandemic response on positive PCR tests.
In summary, the PCR test
simply measures the presence of partial DNA sequences that are present in a
virus, but it cannot tell us whether that virus is active or inactive. Chances
are, if you have no symptoms, a positive test simply means it has detected
inactive viral DNA in your body. This would also mean that you are not
contagious.
Collateral
Damage
While
mortality statistics during the pandemic have been within the norms of any
given year,38,39 meaning the pandemic has not resulted
in an excess number of deaths or a death toll higher than normal, the
collateral damage from pandemic response measures is nearly incalculable.
Public health, both physical and mental, as well as the global economy, have
all suffered tremendous blows.
Fuellmich
cites yet another leaked document written by a German official in the
Department of the Interior, dubbed “the False Alarm paper,”40,41 which
concludes that there’s no evidence to suggest SARS-CoV-2 posed a serious health
risk for the population, at least the danger is no greater than that of many
other viruses, while pandemic measures have “manifold” and “grave”
consequences.
“This,
he concludes, will lead to very high claims for damages, which the government
will be held responsible for. This has now become reality but the paper’s
author was suspended,” Fuellmich says.
“More
and more scientists, but also lawyers, recognize that as a result of the
deliberate panic-mongering and the corona measures enabled by this panic,
democracy is in great danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models …
According
to psychologists and psychotherapists who testified before the corona
committee, children are traumatized en masse, with the worst psychological
consequences yet to be expected in the medium and long term.
In
Germany alone, 500,000 to 800,000 bankruptcies are expected in the fall to
strike small and medium-sized businesses which form the backbone of the
economy. This will result in incalculable tax losses and incalculably high and
long-term social security money transfers for, among other things, unemployment
benefits.”
Legal
Consequences
In closing, Fuellmich reviews
the legal consequences that are currently underway. This includes looking at
the constitutionality of the measures. He notes:
“Very
recently, a judge, Torsten Schleife … declared publicly that the German
judiciary, just like the general public has been so panic-stricken that it was
no longer able to administer justice properly. He says that the courts of law,
and I quote:
‘Have
all too quickly waved through coercive measures which for millions of people
all over Germany represent massive suspensions of their constitutional rights.’
He points out that German citizens, again I quote:
‘Are
currently experiencing the most serious encroachment on their constitutional
rights since the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1949. In order
to contain the corona pandemic federal and state governments have intervened,’
he says, ‘massively and in part threatening the very existence of the country,
as it is guaranteed by the constitutional rights of the people.'”
Then there are the issues of
fraud, intentional infliction of damage and crimes against humanity. According
to Fuellmich, there’s evidence showing a range of falsehoods and
misrepresentations of facts have purposely been circulated, such that, based on
the rules of criminal law, “it can only be assessed as fraud,” and “based on the
rules of civil tort law, this translates into intentional infliction of
damage.”
“The
German professor of civil law, Martin Schwab, supports this finding in public
interviews in a comprehensive legal opinion of around 180 pages. He has
familiarized himself with the subject matter like no other legal scholar has
done thus far and in particular has provided a detailed account of the complete
failure of the mainstream media to report on the true facts of this so-called
pandemic,” Fuellmich says.
“Under
the rules of civil tort law, all those who have been harmed by these PCR tests,
PCR tests induced lockdowns are entitled to receive full compensation for their
losses. In particular, there is a duty to compensate, that is, a duty to pay
damages, for the loss of profits suffered by companies and self-employed
persons as a result of the lockdown, and other measures.
In
the meantime, however, the anti-corona measures have caused and continue to
cause such devastating damage to the world’s population’s health and economy
that the crimes committed by Messrs Drosten, Wieler and the WHO must be legally
qualified as actual crimes against humanity, as defined in Section 7 of the
International Criminal Code.”
To address these grievances,
the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee is prepared to file a
class-action lawsuit — a legal remedy available in the U.S. and Canada —
against the responsible parties.
“It
should be emphasized that nobody must join the class action, but every injured
party can join the class action,” Fuellmich explains. “The advantage of the class action is that only one trial is
needed, namely, to try the complaint of a representative plaintiff who is
affected in a manner typical of everyone else in the class.”
Such a lawsuit would also
open the door to pretrial discovery, which requires all relevant evidence to be
presented to the other party. Destruction or withholding evidence has serious
consequences, as “the party withholding or … destroying evidence loses the case
under these evidence rules.”
In Germany, a group of tort
lawyers have already started the process of disseminating information and legal
forms, and estimating damages among German plaintiffs. Fuellmich concludes his
announcement explaining how the lawsuit will proceed from here:
“Initially,
this group of lawyers had considered to also collect and manage the claims for
damages of other non-German plaintiffs but this proved to be unmanageable.
However,
through an international lawyers’ network, which is growing larger by the day, the
German group of attorneys provides to all of their colleagues, in all other
countries, free of charge, all relevant information, including expert opinions
and testimonies of experts showing that the PCR tests cannot detect infections
and they also provide them with all relevant information as to how they can
prepare and bundle the claims for damages of their clients so that they too can
assert their clients claims for damages either in their home countries, courts
of law, or within the framework of the class action as explained above …
To
the politicians, who believe those corrupt people, these facts are hereby
offered as a lifeline, that can help you readjust your course of action and
start the long overdue public scientific discussion and not go down with those
charlatans and criminals.”
Sources
and References
- 1 Orwell1984366490226.wordpress.com
October 5, 2020
- 2, 21 Age of Autism Reiner Fuellmich
Crimes Against Humanity Transcript
- 3 Internationalfreepress.com
October 6, 2020
- 4 Nexus Newsfeed Reiner
Fuellmich Crimes Against Humanity Transcript
- 5 Fuellmich.com, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich Bio (German)
- 6 Fuellmich.com
- 7 Acu2020.org
Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss
- 8 Acu2020.org Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry
Committee, English
- 9 Algora October 4, 2020
- 10 Ecoterrra.info, Corona
Committee of Inquiry Seeks the Truth, July 1, 2020
- 11 YouTube Stiftung
Corona-Ausschuss channel
- 12, 14 CBS April 2, 2020
- 13 Aljazeera April 5, 2020
- 15 Newsweek April 2, 2020
- 16 CDC.gov June 11, 2009
- 17 Assembly.coe.int June 24, 2010
- 18 Natural Society February 23,
2014
- 19 Nature April 30, 2009
- 20 The Huntingtonian October 6,
2020
- 22 New York Post April 23, 2020
- 23, 25 Breitbart June 22, 2020
- 24 MPR News June 12, 2020
- 26 Cell June 25, 2020; 181(7):
1489-1501.E15
- 27 Wall
Street Journal June 12, 2020 (Archived)
- 28 Nature Immunology September 30, 2020 DOI:
10.1038/s41590-020-00808-x
- 29 The Lancet Microbe September
4, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30114-2
- 30 UPI September 4, 2020
- 31 Nature July 15, 2020; 584: 457-462
- 32 Daily Mail June 12, 2020
- 33 Science Times June 12, 2020
- 34 Cell October 1, 2020; 183(1):
158-168.E14
- 35 BBC July 1, 2020
- 36 CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel
July 13, 2020 (PDF), Page 38
- 37 Lockdownskeptics September 20,
2020
- 38 YouTube, SARS-CoV-2 and the
rise of medical technocracy, Lee Merritt, MD, aprox 8 minutes in (Lie No.
1: Death Risk)
- 39 Technical Report June 2020
DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.24350.77125
- 40 Strategic Culture Foundation
May 29, 2020
- 41 Global Research June 12, 2020
Copyright
© Dr. Joseph Mercola