Authored by Chris Martenson via PeakProsperity.com,
“I had
grasped the significance of the silence of the dog, for one true inference
invariably suggests others…. Obviously the midnight visitor was someone whom
the dog knew well.”
~ Sherlock Holmes – The
Adventures of Silver Blaze
Is it possible to make sense out of nonsense?
So much these days is an
incoherent mess. It’s complete nonsense.
Page 1 excitedly beams
about a glorious rebound in GDP. Yay economic growth!
Page 2 worryingly
notes the near complete failure of Siberian arctic ice to reform during October
and that hurricane Zeta (so many storms this year we’re now into the Greek
alphabet!) has made punishing landfall.
Each is a narrative. Each has
its own inner logic.
But they simply do not
have any external coherence to each other. It’s nonsensical to be excited about
rising economic growth while also concerned that each new unit of growth takes
the planet further past a critical red line.
These narratives are
incompatible. So which one should we pick?
Well, in the end,
reality always has the final say. As Guy McPherson states: Nature bats last.
So better we choose to
follow the narrative that hews closest to what reality actually is, vs what we
desperately want it to be.
‘They’
Don’t Care About Us
While issues like
climate change and economic growth may be difficult to fully grasp and unravel,
direct threats to our lives &/or livelihoods are much more concrete and
something we can react to and resist.
Such immediate and
direct threats are now fully in play and, once again, they’re accompanied by
narratives that are completely at odds with each other. I’m speaking of
Covid and the ways in which our national and global managers are choosing to
respond (or not).
It’s a truly
incoherent mess about which both social media and the increasingly irrelevant
media are working quite hard to misinform us.
The mainstream
narrative about Covid-19, in the West, is this:
·
It’s a quite deadly and novel disease
·
There are no effective treatments
·
Sadly, no double-blind placebo controlled trials exist to
support some of the wild claims out there about various off-patent, cheap and
widely available supplements and drugs
·
Health authorities care about saving lives
·
They care so much, in fact, that along with politicians they’ve
decided to entirely shut down economies
·
There’s a huge second wave rampaging across the US and Europe
and there’s nothing we can do to limit it except shut down businesses and
people’s ability to travel and gather
·
You need to fear this virus and its associated disease
·
All we can do is wait for a vaccine
The alternative
narrative, one that I’ve uncovered after 9 months of almost daily research and
reporting, is this:
·
It’s not an especially dangerous disease and it’s certainly not
novel
·
There is a huge assortment of very effective, cheap and
widely-available preventatives and treatments including (but not limited to)
·
Vitamin D
·
Ivermectin
·
Hydroxychloroquine
·
Zinc
·
Selenium
·
Famotidine (Pepcid)
·
Melatonin
·
Use of a combination of these mostly OTC supplements could
reasonably be expected to drop the severity of illness and the already low
mortality rate by 90% or (probably) more
·
Western health authorities have shown either zero interest in
the results of studies mainly conducted in poorer nations on these combination
therapies or…
·
They have actively run studies designed to fail so that these
cheap, effective therapies could be dismissed or…
·
Set up proper studies but which started late, have immensely
long study periods and most likely won’t be done before a vaccine is hastily
rushed through development.
By the way – every
single one of my assertions and claims is backed by links and supporting
documentation from scientific and clinical trials and studies. I am not
conjecturing here; I am recounting the summary of ten months’ worth of inquiry.
The conclusion I draw
from my narrative (vs. theirs) is that we can no longer assume that the public health or
saving lives has anything to do with explaining or understanding the actions of
these health “managers” (I cannot bring
myself to use the word authorities).
After we eliminate the
impossible – which is that somehow these massive, well-funded bodies have
missed month after month of accumulating evidence in support of ivermectin,
hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, NAC, zinc, selenium and doxycycline/azithromycin
– what remains must be the truth.
As improbable as it
seems, the only conclusion we’re left with is that the machinery of politics,
money and corporate psychopathy is suppressing life saving treatments because
these managers have other priorities besides public health and saving lives.
This is a terribly
difficult conclusion, because it means suspending so much that we hold
dear. Things like the notion that people are basically good. The idea
that the government generally means well. The thought that somehow when the
chips are down and a crisis is afoot, good will emerge and triumph over evil.
I’m sorry to say, the
exact opposite of all of that has emerged as true.
Medical doctors in the
UK NHS system purposely used toxic doses of hydroxychloroquine far too late in
the disease cycle to be of any help simply to ‘make a point’ about
hydroxychloroquine. They rather desperately wanted that drug to fail, so
they made it fail.
After deliberately setting their
trial up for failure, they concluded: “Hydroxychloroquine doesn’t help, and it even
makes things worse.”
Note that in order to
be able to make this claim, they had to be willing to cause harm — even to let
people die. What kind of health official does that?
Not one who actually
has compassion, a heart, or functioning level of sympathy. It’s an awful
conclusion but it’s what remains after we eliminate the impossible.
Getting Past The Emotional Toll
Science has proven
that cheap, safe and significantly protective compounds exist to limit both Covid-related
death and disease
severity.
Yet all of the main
so-called health authorities in the major western countries are nearly
completely ignoring, if not outright banning, these safe, cheap and effective
compounds.
This is crazy-making
for independent observers like me (and you) because the data is so clear. It’s
irrefutable at this point. These medicines and treatments not only work,
but work really, really well.
However most people
will be unable to absorb the data, let alone move beyond it to wrestle with the
implications. Why? Because such data is belief-shattering.
Absorbing this information is not an intellectual process; it’s an emotional
one.
I don’t know why human
nature decided to invest so much in developing a tight wall around the belief
systems that control our actions and thoughts. But it has.
I’m sure there was
some powerful evolutionary advantage. One that’s now being hijacked daily by
social media AI programs to nudge us in desired directions. One that’s being
leveraged by shabby politicians, hucksters, fake gurus, and con men to steer
advantage away from the populace and towards themselves.
The neural wiring of
beliefs is what it is. We have to recognize that and move on.
Some people will be
much faster in their adjustment process than others. (Notably, the Peak
Prosperity tribe is populated with many fast-adjusters, which is unsurprising
given the topics we cover…tough topics tend to attract fast adjusters and repel
the rest)
To move past the
deeply troubling information laid out before us requires us to be willing to
endure a bit of turbulence. It’s the only way.
For you to navigate
these troubling times safely and successfully, you’ll need to see as clearly as
possible the true nature of the game actually being played. To see what
the rules really are – not what you’ve been told they are, or what you wish or
hope they are.
The Manipulation Underway
The data above
strongly supports the conclusion that our national health managers don’t
actually care about public health generally or your health specifically.
If indeed true, then
the beliefs preventing most people from accepting this likely include:
·
Wanting to believe that people are good (a biggie for most
people)
·
Trust and faith in the medical system (really big)
·
Faith in authority (ginormous)
There are many other
operative belief systems I could also list. But this is sufficient to get the
ball rolling.
Picking just one, how
hard would it be for someone to let go of, say, trust in the medical system?
That would be pretty
hard in most cases.
First not trusting the
medical system might mean having to wonder if a loved one might have died
unnecessarily while being treated. Or realizing that you’re now going to
have to research the living daylights out of every medical decision before
agreeing to it. Or worrying that your medications might be more harmful
to you over the long haul than helpful (which is true in many more cases than
most appreciate). It might mean having your personal heroes dinged by suspicion
— perhaps even your father or mother who worked in the medical
profession. It would definitely require a complete reorientation away
from being able to trust anything you read in a newspaper, or see on TV, about
new pharmaceutical “breakthroughs”.
Trust, which is safe
and warm and comforting, then turns into skepticism; which is lonelier and
insists upon active mental involvement.
But, as always, hard
work comes with benefits — with a healthy level of skepticism and involvement,
the families of those recruited into the deadly UK RECOVERY trial could have
looked at the proposed doses of HCQ (2,400 mg on day one! Toxic!) and
said, “Not
now, not ever!” and maybe have saved the life of their loved one.
Look at that tangled
mess of undesirables that comes with unpacking that one belief: regret,
uncertainty, shame, doubt, fallen idols, and vastly more additional effort. Are
all up for grabs when we decide to look carefully at the actions of our
national health managers during Covid.
Which is why most
people simply choose not to look. It’s too hard.
I get it. I have a lot
of compassion for why people choose not to go down that path. It can get
unpleasant in a hurry.
But, just like
choosing to ignore a nagging chest pain, turning away in denial has its own consequences.
The Coming ‘Great Reset’
My coverage of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus) and Covid-19 (the associated disease) has led me to uncover some things that have made me deeply uncomfortable about our global and national ‘managers’. Shameful things, really. Scary things in their implications for what we might reasonably expect (or not expect, more accurately) from the future.
Once we get past the
shock of seeing just how patently corrupt they’ve been, we have to ask
both What’s
next? and What should I do?
After all, you live in
a system whose managers either are too dumb to understand the Vitamin D data
(very unlikely) or have decided that they’d rather not promote it to the
general populace for some reason. It’s a ridiculously safe vitamin with
almost zero downside and virtually unlimited upside.
Either they’re
colossally dumb, or this is a calculated decision. They’re not
dumb. So we have to ask: What’s the calculation being performed here? It’s not public
safety. It’s not your personal health. So… What is it?
This is our line of
questioning and observation. It’s like the short story by Arthur Conan Doyle in
Silver Blaze that many of us informally know as “the case of the dog that didn’t
bark”.
As the story goes, because of a missing clue – a dog who remained silent as a
murder was committed – this conclusion could be drawn: the dog was already
familiar with the killer!
The silence around
Vitamin D alone is extremely telling. It is the pharmacological dog that did
not bark.
One true inference
suggests others. Here, too, we can deduce from the near total silence
around Vitamin D that the health managers would prefer not to talk about it.
They don’t want people to know. That much is painfully clear.
Such lack of promotion
(let alone appropriate study) of safe, effective treatments is a thread that,
if tugged, can unravel the whole rug. The silence tells us everything we
need to know.
Do they want people to
suffer and die? I don’t know. My belief systems certainly hope not.
Perhaps the death and suffering are merely collateral damage as they pursue a
different goal — money, power, politics? Simply the depressing result of
a contentious election year? More than that?
We’ve now reached the
jumping off point where we may well find out just how far down the rabbit hole
goes.
A massive
grab for tighter control over the global populace is now being fast-tracked at
the highest levels. Have you heard of the Great Reset yet?
If
not, you soon will.
In Part 2: The Coming ‘Great Reset’ we lay
out everything we know so far about the multinational proposal to transform
nearly every aspect of global industry, commerce, trade, and social structure.
If you read on, be ready and
willing to let go of cherished beliefs and to suspend what
you know to be true. Because none of us has that in hand. It’s
going to be a wild ride from here.
Something very big is
afoot and I suspect that Covid-19 is merely an excuse providing cover for a
much bigger power grab over the world’s wealth and peoples.
Click here to read Part 2 of this
report (free executive summary, enrollment required
for full access).
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/martenson-we-are-pawns-bigger-game-we-realize