Millions of people can experience life-threatening effects from the vaccine
by Jon Rappoport
December 14, 2020
(To join our email list, click
here.)
From the UK, The Guardian has the story [1]: “People with a
history of significant allergic reactions should not receive the Covid vaccine,
the medicines regulator has said, after two NHS workers experienced symptoms on
Wednesday.”
They just figured this out? Now?
The Guardian is referring to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, which
has just been approved in the US.
Two people experiencing significant adverse effects may not sound
important, particularly since they already a history of allergic reactions, but
the following quote in the Guardian article raises major red flags a mile high:
“The MHRA [UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency]
advice states: ‘Any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to
a vaccine, medicine or food (such as previous history of anaphylactoid reaction
or those who have been advised to carry an adrenaline autoinjector) should not
receive the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine. Resuscitation facilities should be
available at all times for all vaccinations. Vaccination should only be carried
out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available’.”
First of all, a very large number of people have a history of
allergic reactions to a vaccine or medicine or food. Automatically, these
people should not take the vaccine. But how many people in the general public
are aware of this restriction?
Second, with the operation to vaccinate hundreds of millions of
people running at top speed, who actually believes that many locations where
shots are given will have the necessary resuscitation equipment on hand? Sheer
insanity.
Then, on top of all this, we have a bombshell statement from the
Denver Post [2]: “Documents published by the two [vaccine] companies [Pfizer
and BioNTech] showed that people with a history of severe allergic reactions
were excluded from the [clinical vaccine] trials, and doctors were advised to
look out for such reactions in trial participants who weren’t previously known
to have severe allergies.”
In other words, the clinical trials were already biased, because
they excluded people with a history of allergic reactions. Therefore, the
performance of the vaccine looked safer. Therefore, no one would find out that
allergic reactions to the vaccine are a MAJOR danger.
And NOW, as if it’s nothing more than an afterthought, we get—“Oh,
by the way, if people have allergies, they shouldn’t take the vaccine.”
Why don’t regulators simply admit, “This vaccine is as disastrous
as possible, but we can’t let that cat out of the bag.”
I have written about the inherent dangers of the new experimental
RNA technology deployed with this COVOD vaccine. The world population is a vast
group of guinea pigs. Past efforts to introduce RNA tech have failed because
serious autoimmune reactions have occurred. [3] The body basically attacks
itself.
What rational person would line up to take this shot?
You have to ask yourself why some Pittsburgh and Chicago medical
centers aren’t making the new COVID vaccine mandatory for their own healthcare
workers. [4] [5]
They’ve issued that announcement on the basis of wait-and-see.
They know the vaccine carries major risks, and the clinical trials were far
from convincing.
According to WebMD [6], “more than 50 million Americans suffer
from allergies each year.” 200,000 people come to the ER with food allergies.
4-5% of the population have food allergies. Who can say, with certainty, how
many Americans would experience, say, life- threatening anaphylactic shock from
the COVID vaccine?
And when it comes to medicines, consider just one type of allergic
reaction—to penicillin or antibiotics. Is the outbreak of a rash serious enough
to warrant automatic exemption from the COVID vaccine? Should shortness of
breath be the standard? No one knows.
Finally, as I’ve reported in these pages several times, the 3
major clinical trials of COVID vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca) were
designed to prevent nothing more than a “mild case of COVID-19.” That means a
cough, or chills and fever. [7]
Serious cases of illness? Hospitalization? Death? These were not
on the radar of the clinical trials.
Cough, or chills and fever, cure themselves naturally. No need for
a vaccine.
So again, what rational person would line up to take the COVID
shot?
What rational person would imagine the celebratory media coverage
of the vaccine rollout, or the carnival barking of Trump, amounts to more than
a typical sales job and a hustle and a con? [8]
Of course, you’re not supposed to know about the information in
this article, even though it’s readily available in open source literature and
in mainstream news. Social media censor the ANALYSIS OF THE MEANING OF THIS
INFORMATION.
That’s called a clue.
That’s called medical tyranny.
A dictatorship wants you to take the COVID shot.
That’s another clue.
SOURCES:
[2] https://www.denverpost.com/2020/12/09/pfizer-covid-vaccine-allergic-reactions/
[6] https://www.webmd.com/allergies/allergy-statistics
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a
candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of
California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose
of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer
Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing
articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon
has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and
creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews
emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine
emails here.