Friday, March 12, 2021

Thank God for Columbus By Jeremy Egerer

(This author does what many of us do - we research our topic, write a good report and then at the conclusion throw in something from our un-researched catch basin which detracts not only from our report, but our credibility. See if you agree on his reference to Hitler - https://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/p/bu2b-brought-up-to-believe.html?m=0 - a whole library of myth breakers for due diligent readers. - CL)


At the time Columbus discovered the New World , the great difference between the main Mexica god and the European God was that the European God would kill you for not being good, and the Mexica god would kill you for not being bad.

Even when we had mischievous gods, we were better than the Mexica, the most dominant tribe of the Aztecs.  Going all the way back to the Romans, God might throw an army under the bus because a general broke his word, and the Jews, the Muslims, and the Christians all believed that God is better than us — which is why He warred with us constantly.  Huitzilopochtli, the main god of the Mexica, had no such benevolence to fall back upon.  You fed him, or he would wipe you out.  And the way that you fed him (and other lesser deities) was by flaying people, or burning them alive, or cutting out their hearts.  Sometimes two of the three.  I'm told that some priests even took the human skin and wore it, like Leatherface in The Texas Chainsaw Massacre.  

Things had been this way for a long time before the Spaniards arrived.  By the time whites got to America, the Mexica religion had already reached its worst.  Decades of bloody imperialism had brought the Mexica to the top.  A few years of heavy snows and crop failures had brought the empire to the brink.  They cranked up the sacrifices to a level nobody had ever seen before, perhaps in the history of the whole world — ten thousand in a single festival, circa 1450.  Unfortunately, right after they did, the weather got better again.  This reinforced the already murderous mindset of the Aztecs, and they went ravaging the countryside for people to loot, rape, flay, and burn.  

T.R. Fehrenbach says in Fire and Blood, his history of Mexico, that estimates of victims after this "miracle" range from the tens to the hundreds of thousands.  At one point, the capital, Tenochtitl√°n, became so covered in blood that diseases easily broke out, and its lake, which was already on the verge of toxicity, became filthy, putrid, and dangerous.  Tallies of the dead depended on who was doing the talking.  The pro-Spanish conquistadors, whose interest lay in demonizing the natives (and thus taking an obvious moral high ground), said they found as many as a hundred thousand trophy skulls, and Bernal Diaz says around twenty thousand people a year were slaughtered before the conquest.  The pro-Indian Spaniards, such as Bartolom√© de las Casas, looking to downplay the atrocities and save an already brutalized ex-brutalizer, said the yearly "expenditure" was only a hundred.  Nice guy, but definitely a lie.

Some people might blame the Mexica for bulldozing and brutalizing their neighbors, but the plain fact is that their neighbors, had they had the genius and organization of the Mexica, would have done the same thing in their place.  Culturally and religiously, they were too similar.  The Mexica simply beat them to it, just as the Spaniards (thank God) out-produced and out-organized the Aztecs, and as we beat and out-bred the Spaniards.  

The great Mexica conqueror's name was Tlacaelel, who ruled somewhere between 1430 and 1481.  He was great founder like Lycurgus, or Moses, though he preferred to work behind the throne rather than on it.  He took a backwater, down-on-their-luck people and gave them a new history.  Told them they were the chosen race, sent by Huitzilopochtli, the Sun-god, to do His will.  What was God's will?  Not to be just, or wise, or even just kind, but to make all the other races sacrifice the right way and to the right god.  How were they to accomplish this?  Through heartless and perpetual warfare*.  Obedience on Earth was rewarded with wealth and power and successful crops.  A good death was rewarded by an eternity in paradise. 

Tlacaelel gave them the myth and then organized them into an army.  They were just a random tribe, at first, and relatively egalitarian.  He split the people into classes, and the first of these was the warriors.  Being a warrior was the only way up after that.  You had to distinguish yourself in battle, or you would never get a fiefdom or a good position in the government.  Once you did kill enough enemies, you took land and serfs and slaves from all the peoples around you.  You made them work for you, giving them only a bare subsistence, as the Spartans did the with the Helots, and you used everything beyond this to enrich yourself and your family.  You would be given a title, and the title would be passed on to your children.

Beyond this military aristocracy sprawled a massive bureaucracy — the lawyers, engineers, teachers, administrators, and other officials necessary to keep up the Aztec empire.  Most Mexica lived on their own little plots and farmed for themselves and their families.  Massive amounts of land, on the other hand, were stolen from (and worked by) the conquered.  A merchant class, not existing for the sake of itself, but to do the special bidding of the state, ran special errands for the government.  I'm told by Fehrenbach that nobody except the freeholder, working his own land to feed his own family, worked for anybody other than the state.

So war socialism was the modus operandi.  Large tracts of farmland, known as Shield or War Fields, were tilled by the conquered and reserved for the military.  Thus, warfare became long-range and protracted.  Nobody in the whole region, reaching from the desert up north to Panama down south, was safe from rape and plunder and sacrifice.  Pretexts to warfare were easily invented.  An insult, a delayed tribute, a harassed merchant were all excuses to mass-murder.  And I'm told the Mexica were experts at being insulted.

You would think subjugating the neighbors would be enough for any people, but the Mexica were bad at forging alliances.  Why sacrifice your own people when you can capture the neighbors?  So for a while, they left enemy cities virtually in charge of themselves and put them under tribute, and when rebellions perennially broke out, they decided to raid them — unless there was an unconditional surrender.  There was no Pax Mexicana.  Wars were staged to find victims, and the need for victims was endless.  Governors were placed over cities, and cities were brutalized into rebellion.

Religion aside, the machinery of the state would allow nothing less.  The most prominent people in the society were warriors.  The only way for the lower classes to get into the upper classes was by killing or capturing.  The growing bureaucracy needed more plunder.  The Mexica peasantry wasn't allowed to be plundered.  And the best way to get into heaven was by dying in battle.  There was probably no people, in the history of the world, more inclined by their system to warfare and mass murder.

I try to avoid comparing people to Hitler, but I have no problem comparing Hitler to Tlacaelel.

Jeremy Egerer is the author of the troublesome essays on Letters to Hannah, and he welcomes followers on Twitter and Facebook.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/03/thank_god_for_columbus.html