Time to decide folks.
There are plenty of reasons to both take and refuse the Covid jabs.
Among other things you're being lied to, deliberately on their effectiveness. State governments, along with various "health agencies", are provably lying -- and trivially so. You're being told, for example, that "99%", "98%" or "97%" (depending on where you are) of people that are getting seriously ill with Covid are "unvaccinated."
Let's take Tennessee. Look at their "unified command" dashboard and set the date to June 22th, one month ago by their data's reports. They show 22,432 ever hospitalized with Covid on that date.
Now set it to 7/22, the latest for which it is updated. They show 22,737 ever hospitalized, a difference of 305.
They now say that almost 200 have been hospitalized recently as breakthrough -- that is, vaccinated -- cases (out of about 1,000 breakthroughs they claim in total.)
Well, when did the breakthroughs happen? They don't say, exactly, but over the last month only 305 people, by them, were hospitalized with Covid in total.
That's about 10 a day across the entire state.
There's also roughly 3 deaths a day across the entire state.
But then, as now, we're still funny-gaming the numbers. If you go into the hospital for any reason they test you. Why? Because if you're positive they want their magic $13,000 Biden Money (formerly Trump money) if you're on Medicare and Medicaid for treating a "Covid case." Biden is still continuing this bull**** no matter why you're there. Chest pain? Covid! Oh, never mind the heart attack.
So are the "hospitalized" actually hospitalized for Covid or is Tennessee counting anyone in the hospital who tested positive irrespective of the reason for their admission? This particular game has been run since March of 2020 and nobody has put a stop to it because they're making money from it -- lots of money.
Never mind that these jabs are not behaving like a vaccine. US Code: "The term “vaccine” means any substance designed to be administered to a human being for the prevention of 1 or more diseases."
The data is that these jabs do not prevent disease. They also do not prevent transmission of disease. In fact they appear to, if you get a breakthrough case, make transmission more likely in that the Ct data from these miners shows equal or lower values on balance in the vaccinated cohort with one sample at Ct22! Reminder: The lower the Ct the more virus you have in your body.
Now granted this is a small group -- very small. But it is extremely concerning that the lowest Ct recorded among these cases was a fully-vaccinated person. Where is the data from the state labs and CDC on these "breakthroughs" and their Ct numbers generally? It's not being reported. I bet you can guess why not without needing more than one guess.
This appears to be confirmed as something that does indeed happen by the reported "super-spreading" person who (1) was fully-vaccinated, (2) infected more than 60 other people and (3) most of those whom he gave it to were also vaccinated. He obviously was an extremely-efficient emitter of virus!
The only remaining argument for the jabs is that they make a personal severe outcome less likely. Here the data is somewhat more-reassuring but the adverse effect profile of the shots is not reassuring at all, it is being deliberately glossed over, and as a result the question as to whether or not to take them is a deeply personal decision that must be informed by your personal medical status coupled with intentional deception on those advocating for the jabs. How in the hell do you make an informed decision under those circumstances?
Unfortunately the so-called "public health" authorities have destroyed -- not just damaged, but destroyed -- their own credibility. Tennessee's Department of Health proved themselves liars with nothing more than public data. So have others. I have multiple reported sets of data from individual practices where the percentage of unvaccinated people presenting with Covid-19 symptoms is lower than the percentage of unvaccinated people in the population of that specific area. In other words the data is that the jabs not only do not prevent you from getting the virus at all but in fact may ENHANCE the risk of infection and this, incidentally, voids the argument that the jabs are a vaccine from a LEGAL standpoint.
It may well be true that originally, over the first couple of months, you have some level of protection -- perhaps even very good protection. But on the data that protection appears to rapidly wane and it appears that within six months it can turn into potentiating infection instead via OAS, ADE or both. In other words the data suggests you get protection originally but then get screwed compared against where you were when you started, which would suit the makers of the jabs just fine, yes? How will you like it if you wind up dependent on continuous "boosters" at whatever price they want to charge forever lest you be screwed instead of helped.
If you want to know why that would be hidden, other than the obvious -- that they simply will never admit they failed and you're being cajoled or coerced into taking a dangerous drug that in the intermediate term has damaged your immune system -- that should be obvious as it opens up a legal attack avenue against any such mandate, in health care or otherwise, that you can drive a truck through. Oh, and the makers of said jabs were given legal immunity from this outcome too; if accepting the first of the jabs turns you into a junkie permanently dependent on repeated jabs to stave off disease which otherwise becomes more likely as a direct result of accepting the original shots you cannot sue Pfizer, Moderna or J&J.
Further, however, and far more importantly, is the fact that with the emerging evidence on Ct reports from so-called "breakthrough" cases it is becoming very clear that vaccinated people in health care settings are actively dangerous as if and when they get a breakthrough case they will be more likely to spread the virus to others as their infected state will not be known as rapidly and reliably as with someone who has not been vaccinated, and by the point of detection their viral load will be materially higher.
This is exactly what occurred in the early months where health care workers were the vector into vulnerable people and killed them. We knew this was a risk and refused to isolate health care workers from the general population. It is now clear that this is very likely to happen again but this time is being "boosted" by the jabs. Indeed there is a clean argument that being jabbed against this virus should be banned among those working in a health care environment since an infected person with a lower Ct number is much more-infectious than someone with a higher one. The viral load and thus capacity to transmit the virus doubles with each lower Ct! If the jabs make it more-likely that you will not develop symptoms until you have a lower Ct value then they make you more-dangerous to others irrespective of whether they prevent your mortality.
Among those who conclude that the balance of risks and benefits for them does not favor the jab, and who are being coerced, there is one final point to consider: You are not alone. Further, we have an extremely tight labor market, so you have all the power in this debate.
USE IT!
If even 10%, say much less 20% of an organization refuses such a mandate and any "penalty" (e.g. "test daily or get jabbed") and your employer decides to fire you all for your refusal they collapse. I don't care if this is the VA health system, a local hospital or other organization. You may or may not, in the fullness of time, also be able to successfully sue but in the meantime if 1 in 5 employees is removed there is no way the firm survives that event without severe or even critical damage that collapses the enterprise.
Collective action -- that is, a strike -- is how gross abuses were dealt with in the past and is a non-violent and entirely-legal act.
Simply put: REFUSE.
Let them try to get your 20% of the output from the other 80% of the remaining staff. They will fail; a decent percentage of the remainder will blow up medically due to stress and similar and suddenly they're not down 20% on their labor they're down by half.
WHEN they blow up and come crying to you to come back to work you demand double your previous pay -- permanently -- and no, you still will NOT take the jab nor be discriminated against on masks and tests.
Collapse all entities that attempt to enforce mandates.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=243070