According to VAERS, 3,079 people have died after receiving the Pfizer vaccine, and nearly 3,900 have suffered a permanent disability. Many more thousands have been hospitalized with post-vaccination side-effects. Think about that, and then think about this "approval" of the vaccine as being "safe." While I realize that nothing is perfect, my only conclusion is that it was a political approval. The vaccine has killed and disabled an awful lot of otherwise healthy people, which doesn't seem to me to warrant the green light it's been given.
Previous experimental vaccines have been pulled for far fewer dangerous side-effects. Normal
vaccine approval is a 5- to
10-year process. We've accelerated the timeline because of the
pandemic. Was that wise?
While I'm not a medical person
or a researcher, I am guilty of exercising logic whenever I can. We
still have no clear evidence that the Pfizer jab (or any of the others, for
that matter) is safe in the long run. Previous attempts at a vaccine for swine flu, for instance, were halted after
causing Guillain-Barré syndrome in recipients. It's an awful
disease, causing total paralysis in some. Note that it is one of the
serious side-effects of this vaccine, along with clotting disorders and heart
disorders. All can have lifelong deleterious effects.
Then, there's the way the
vaccine-pushers are willfully ignoring the fact that the delta variant infects
the vaccinated, and if you read the story of the vaccinated chickens that ran on American
Thinker yesterday, you'll understand that the vaccine itself may be
causing virus's rapid transformation. The idea that a vaccine can
cause a virus to mutate, and that the mutations may be worse than the original,
is inescapable. I've written before about antibody-dependent enhancement. There are many
warnings, but the government refuses to listen to any of them.
Because the bloviating class
has spread so much misinformation about treatments, to keep up the relentless
push to get everyone jabbed (the emergency use authorization is okayed only if
there is no viable treatment), many doctors have been afraid to prescribe
available treatments, or believe they have been disallowed to prescribe
them. I know I had to hunt for a doctor willing to treat me in case
I get COVID, and I have heard from readers whose doctors flat-out stated that
they were "unable" to prescribe ivermectin. If that's the
case, by the way, America's Frontline Doctors will help.
Way back in January, I wrote an
article here titled Munchausen by (government) proxy. I felt that we
were on the wrong track — and that was before we started our mass vaccination
drive. Munchausen by proxy is a mental illness diagnosis, where the
caregiver convinces someone that he is ill, then takes control over his life.
I personally think I called it
correctly — and if you look at places like Australia, where totalitarian
lockdowns have become commonplace, it's hard to call that anything but a mental
illness sapping those in charge of all common sense. There's a
secondary mental health condition called Stockholm syndrome. It's
where someone, generally someone taken hostage, starts to identify with the
captors. An emotional bond forms. Seeing the abject fear
and dependence on government and the willingness to give up basic rights among
many people, I think this applies as well.
It's disturbing to see our
cities rush to ban unvaccinated people from living their lives. The
relentless pressure to get the jab will be even more fierce. For
those of us unwilling to be guinea pigs, life could get even more difficult.
One thing I want to note
before ending. Despite the continual barrage of scare porn from the
government and the press, if you want to see what the reality is with COVID
infections and deaths, check this site. It's
kept up to date. You might be shocked at how few people are dying
from COVID right now.