Full text: https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?blog=Market-Ticker-Nad
In fact outcomes have either been flat or even mildly backward.
Don't think so?
Have a look over here; this is not speculation, it is the actuarial results of a group who analyzes all 330 million Americans and thus mathematically and on a statistical basis is right. This doesn't mean you might not do better or worse but it does mean that across the entire population it is what it is and thus for any leading cause of death if you claim you fixed or otherwise improved it without the death happening anyway from some other cause, which I remind you if you're the individual dead is dead and why doesn't matter and that outcome will and does inevitably show up right there.
Examples from the current (2021, so pre-clotshot) table compiled in 2021 (and used in the most-recent 2024 trustee report.) These are the expected remaining years of life at a few selected ages.
30: 45.34
40: 36.58
50: 28.12
60: 20.41
70: 13.69
Now let's look at the oldest table still on that same page -- it is from 2004 during which cancer care "treatment" and costs have skyrocketed in both prevalence and price:
30: 46.58
40: 37.28
50: 28.46
60: 20.36
70: 13.27
Heh ******* (pick one -- doctor, hospital, insurance executive, pharma **********, politician, etc.) how come there has been no real statistically-valid improvement and in fact life expectancy has gone down a tiny bit in several age classes over the last two decades -- not by a lot, but it has, and those that have changed did so by a fraction of a year which is a statistical ZERO.
Remember, cancer gets about 40% of all people more-or-less, right?
Yet despite trillions of dollars spent and, I'm sure, some successes in making someone who has it not have it the overall statistical impact on human lifespan in the United States over the last 20 years IS ZERO.