It’s fascinating to observe how we’re learning how fake modern scientage is, how misleading modern scientistry is, and how at the same time we’re learning more about genuine human history than ever before thanks to the relentless application of curiosity and technology. Because the truth, most of which is still undiscovered, is far more strange and complicated than the nonsensical modern narrative would have it.
Scientists who revealed an underground ‘hidden city’ in Egypt have announced the discovery of a second city they say ‘proves’ the existence of a massive subterranean complex linking the Giza pyramids 2,000 feet beneath the surface.
The newly-discovered shafts and chambers could rewrite history if confirmed to be true........
Note in particular the “fierce backlash” from archeologists as well as the appeal to their magic “Science”. This is downright comical because archeology doesn’t involve scientody at all; they don’t do experiments, there is no reproducing their nonexistent experiments, and their field doesn’t even properly merit being described as a science at all.
If archeology is “science” then so is cleaning your room.
Aside from defending their fictional narratives about the past and desperately trying to shore up the shattered remnants of the false theory about evolution, what is the point of crying Science about what is a straightforward claim about an observation of existing objects? There is no need for anyone to express an opinion when the Egyptian authorities can simply dig a hole and see if the perceived structures are actually there.
As Mr. Gioia observed, the entire structure of the modernist narrative is collapsing. It is so fragile now that one simple discovery of a past civilization will be sufficient to finish it off, which may explain the instinctively frantic denials on the part of the mainstream archeologists.