The Myth of Coherence - by Vox Day - Sigma Game - The sooner you abandon it, the better

 Again and again, I see low-status men complaining that things are different for men and for women. They complain that women express opinions that diverge from their observed behavior, that women do things they say they would never do, and encourage both men and women to take counterproductive actions.

All of that is true. And it is akin to complaining that gravity won’t let you fly without wings. Consider the following exchange:.....

https://sigmagame.substack.com/p/the-myth-of-coherence?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2265630&post_id=224743197&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=y7h5a&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email 

Women are, have always been, and will always be, incoherent. That’s what I mean when I say women are dynamic. Feelings are, by their nature, transient, and so any philosophy or epistemology that is constructed on a core foundation of feelings is inevitably and always going to be incoherent, self-contradictory, and anti-logical.

So what? Love is incoherent, self-contradictory, and anti-logical too. That doesn’t make it bad, wrong, or irrelevant. Neither coherence nor consistency are moral values.

Women are what they are. Appreciate what you find good about them and accept the reality of what you don’t. Because regardless of what you may think of them, you’re not going to change them with your rhetoric and your whining.