The migrants are being naturally selected for conquest and predation, not a better life through integration:
These migrants have gone through their own personal hell to get to Europe so they feel completely entitled to the spoils of their journey.
No only are the USA, the UK, and Europe not going to vote their way out of the invasions, they’re not going to be able to escape the inevitable violence that will determine who rules whom.
https://x.com/DiscoOrpheus/status/1971637319472955796
As if I hadn't fried my brain with pizzagate already, 6 months later I found myself working a journalist desk in Tunisia during the chaotic aftermath of the fall of Gaddafi when he was sodomized with bayonets in the streets of Tripoli after being deposed by the Clinton cartel and globalist vampires
It’s a lot harder for the satanic rulers of the West to convincingly dismiss so-called “conspiracy theories” when their strongest and best-armed opponents are openly calling out their wicked depopulationist objectives:.....
‘It’s working brilliantly. In a generation or two, there’ll be no continuation of their bloodlines. Only a small elite, the ones they actually need, will remain.’
Even the Ukraine war is being fought with surprisingly little regard for preserving the lives of Ukrainian soldiers, so much so that there are various theories about what the plans are for the depopulated lands that remain to the Kiev regime if it should survive the inevitable surrender to Russia.
And is it really a “conspiracy theory” to observe that people have been pushing the “too many people” line for nearly as long as Generation X has been alive?
UPDATE: Elon Musk’s girlfriend knows too
“Luckily there’s a massive population drop coming.”
...The family, then, is the social unit that makes us the most successful mammal ever created. To it we owe our primacy in stable, coherent communities and in larger units such as tribes and nations.
Why then are we allowing it to collapse?
Throughout the civilized world human populations are decreasing. The replacement rate for almost all developed societies is inadequate. The world birth rate has decreased dramatically from 37.8 per 1,000 women to 32.6 in 1970 and then 17.5 in 2020, 17.3 in 2025. In America the birth rate has declined from 24.8 in1950 to 18.4 in 1970 and 10.9 in 2020 and 10.7 in 2025. Most people do not want families, or any but small families. Add to this the decline in people who are even getting married, which has declined worldwide for the last 50 years and is down to under 5 marriages per 1000 people in developed countries; in the U.S. from 8.2 per thousand in 2000 to 6.8 in 2010 and 6.1 in 2023, the lowest ever recorded.
The family, in short, is disappearing.
Obviously without fathers children can easily drift to crime, and the correlation between fatherless boys and illegality is nearly absolute. But the effect on many other aspects of society is also palpable and deplorable, and there is no sign that this is going to change with a Trumpian anti-crime government in charge.
I’ve said for some time that Western civilization is collapsing. The dolorous status of the family nowadays, that most basic unit in primate superiority, is proof of its immediacy.
The second part of a socialization/oral history post. Jumping right in. Here’s the link to part one.....
....Gen X blessings aside, I don’t exempt my generation from criticism. This is because a) my world view is built with observation and logic and b) I’m not CLI. Being completely blunt, the hard reality is that not all members of Gen X are earth-born angels. We forked. Some - like me - understand our historic position and try to pick up our heritage and pass it on. Others became boomer lite and are part of the problem. I obviously write from my perspective in the first group. Group two is repulsive.1.....
....So the question isn’t if the boomers looked outside the narrative and planned for the future. Even to the same extent we did. They objectively didn’t. Nor if it was possible for them to realize things were changing on a structural level. They objectively did....
....No generation in human history got more for less. No generation in human history paid a smaller percentage forward. And no generation in human history vaporized more socio-economic capital. It’s remarkable to consider what the family boomers could have accumulated with my perception. Even if they’d started when I first made my perception known to them. Roads not taken.
Fortunately, we can fell that decision tree and its poison fruit. That Gen X hinge. It’s just harder than it should be for less reward.
Anyhow, the rest follows pretty straightforwardly. Acknowledging the new circumstances leads to questions about what happened. And that leads to unpleasantries about doing to mitigate what was obviously false faith in a dying system. Again. The question is did you know?
I've seen this movie before.
Nvidia "invests" in AI company.
AI Company buys Nvidia hardware (with said investment.)
Everyone profits, right?
Wrong.
Consider why the company would take Nvidia's deal rather than go to the market for funds. If the market believed their idea was marketable at a reasonable cost for the money, the market would fund it. They won't -- at least not at the scale the firm wants and at terms they find acceptable. That ought to make your hair stand up.
It doesn't because you're not paying attention.
Or perhaps you really are stupid.
Nvidia could build out what this customer is doing if they were convinced the customer was right -- they could, for example, buy a division or stand up a subsidiary. They didn't. Now you ought to be feeling the electricity from holding a golf club pointed to the sky in a thunderstorm.
This is precisely the sort of thing that Lucent did in the 1990s. People thought it was "safe" in that they'd have more preference in the capital stack and could repo the gear if they didn't get paid. The latter is true, by the way, and if the gear has a long and stable-value life then this can work out ok as a risk-mitigating factor.
In technology fields that's never the case; all new hardware is worth very nearly zero within months to a couple of years.
So yes, when the customer blew up Lucent could repo the gear. Now they have it back and.... its worth 10 cents on the dollar that it was sold it for originally and by the way, the customer still owes you 90 cents so that's an 80% loss and flushed down the hole you be. Incidentally to make it worse there's suddenly a monstrous amount of said used (and nearly worthless) used gear available which of course makes the problem worse.
That is precisely how they blew up.
The same thing is true always and everywhere in all tech-related companies. Let's say that Nvidia structured this deal to be able to take back their chips. So what? That's no protection at all......
For the last 60 years, the federal government has been funding an agency to “encourage” the families of white victims to refrain from expressing their anger and seeking vengeance for the death of their loved ones at the hands of black murderers. It’s called “Community Relations Service” and it is why every murder of a white person committed by minorities is reliably followed by an insipid statement by a family member about how they a) decry racism and b) preemptively forgive the unrepentant murderer:
I’m looking into the Community Relations Service and going insane. You’re telling me we had a fucking X-Files of black people crimes that was the only part of the govt besides the Smithsonian categorically exempt from FOIA requests, responsible for resettling Haitians and Cubans?
This is why it is vital to reject Churchianity and every other perversion of Christian and European cultures, as they are conceived and implemented for the purpose of destroying both Christianity and European families....