This is why you can't trust one single thing the media says
about immigration. Or, for that matter, economics. First, consider the
assertions made in a ThinkProgress article attacking Bernie Sanders's moderate position on
immigration. I've emphasized the two of interest.
Sanders’
position on immigration has been called “complicated” and he has been
criticized by immigration activists for supporting the idea that immigrants
coming to the U.S. are taking jobs and hurting the economy, a theory that has
been proven incorrect. Both of his leading Democratic challengers,
Hillary Clinton and Martin O’Malley, have recognized that new immigrants coming
to the country actually boost the economy. But Sanders continues to align
himself more closely with Democratic positions of the past.
“I frankly do not believe that we should be bringing in significant numbers of
unskilled to workers to compete with [unemployed] kids,” Sanders said. “I want
to see these kids get jobs.”
Studies have shown that immigrants actually create jobs for American workers.
Researchers recently found that each new immigrant has produced about 1.2 new
jobs in the U.S., most of which have gone to native-born workers. And according
to the Atlantic, an influx in immigration can cause non-tradable professions —
jobs like hospitality and construction that cannot be outsourced — to see a
wage increase because the demand for goods and services grows with the
expanding population.
Sounds pretty conclusive, doesn't it? The
"theory" that immigrants are taking jobs and hurting the economy has
been "proven incorrect". Not only that, but "studies have
shown" that each and every new immigrant creates 1.2 new jobs!
Second, let's go and look at the study that
provided the basis for these assertions, "Are
Immigrants a Shot in the Arm for the Local Economy?", published in April 2015:
Most
research on the effects of immigration focuses on the effects of immigrants as
adding to the supply of labor. By contrast, this paper studies the effects of
immigrants on local labor demand, due to the increase in consumer demand for
local services created by immigrants. This effect can attenuate downward
pressure from immigrants on non-immigrants' wages, and also benefit
non-immigrants by increasing the variety of local services available. For this
reason, immigrants can raise native workers' real wages, and each immigrant
could create more than one job. Using US Census data from 1980 to 2000,
we find considerable evidence for these effects: Each immigrant creates
1.2 local jobs for local workers, most of them going to native workers, and
62% of these jobs are in non-traded services. Immigrants appear to raise local
non-tradables sector wages and to attract native-born workers from elsewhere in
the country. Overall, it appears that local workers benefit from the arrival of
more immigrants.
Now, to anyone who pays attention to
economics, those dates should ring a bell. 1980 to 2000... just happens to
closely coincide with the dates of one of the largest debt-funded economic
expansions in world history. Not only that, but that period also precedes the
U.S. interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq which led to the usual influx of
"refugees" from those and other countries, such as Somalia, where
U.S. forces were active. From 1980 to 2000, there were 841,149 annual
immigrants, 23 percent fewer than the average in the subsequent 15 years.
Not counting undocumented workers, the U.S.
has been "strengthened" by adding an average of 1,090,520 legal
immigrants annually, which, when combined with the reports of the study, means
that from 2000 to 2015, immigrants should have created 19.6 million new jobs
for native workers in addition to supplying approximately 10.6 million new jobs
themselves. (The latter must be the case due to the new jobs reportedly going
to native workers and is a conservative estimate based on the EPR). This
amounts to a total of 30.2 million new jobs created by immigration since 2000.
Now let's look at the numbers from 2000 to
2015. In January 2000, the labor force was 142,267,000 and the Employment-Population
Ratio was 64.6, meaning there were 91,904,482 jobs. Therefore, according to the
NBER model, the beneficial effects of immigration are such that after 15 more
years of it there should be just over 122 million jobs in 2015.
In July 2015 the labor force had grown by
nearly 15 million to 157,065,000, which is in line with the 10.6 million new
immigrant workers, but population grew to nearly 320 million and the EPR fell
to 59.3.That works out to 93,139,545 jobs, which is a mere 28,960,455
fewer jobs than the NBER model predicted. From 2000 to 2015, 16.4
million new immigrants have created a grand total of 1,235,063 new jobs, which
means that either a) over 10 million native Americans have lost their jobs to
immigrant labor or b) over 90 percent of immigrants are collecting welfare.
Either way, these 16.4 million immigrants have not been a boost to the economy.
I should note that it would have been just as
easy to use GDP and wage statistics to disprove some of the other assertions in
the first article, but it should suffice to point out that the reason the
Federal Reserve has maintained a zero interest rate policy for the last five
years is to compensate for insufficient demand, thereby proving that the demand
for goods and services has not grown in line with the expanding population.
The facts are absolutely clear: immigrants do
NOT create new jobs for native workers and they do not boost the economy.
