(Throughout its 2000+ history, it has been Christianity which has stepped forth to prevent the invading hordes from overrunning western civilization. Occasionally, the individual might have been a cleric - most of the time it was a leader, who just happened to be a Christian, who stepped forth to lead the forces which beat back the invaders. From King Alfred to Jan Sobieski, the pattern was established - as the Christian character of western civilization developed over the centuries, the institutional corruption allowed the periodic moral degradation to enable the pagans to again threaten what had been built. Each time a new leader entered to beat them back.
Understand this: We are being invaded - that's a fact. The invasion is being aided and abetted by our present leadership - both parties,that we elected - for their personal and corporate gain. They are NOT going to change their plan. In fact, they are doubling down to destroy any threat to their rule. Notice how two so-called 'opposite' parties are cooperating in France to undercut the French nationalist party. Expect the same here in the US. It's already happening - notable GOP supporters are saying they will support Hillary if Trump is the GOP candidate.
Folks, we are at war, like it or not. No, I don't mean ISIS or Islam, that's a separate issue. We are at war with our own leadership - again, both parties - because they are essentially two parts of the same mindset - global all world government. They are the enablers of ISIS and Islam. Without their moral and financial support, ISIS, Islam or whatever would not be a factor.
Our present leadership will do anything and everything to stop our attempts to get our country back. And I mean everything within their power, which is vast. They lack one thing - the power is in the people - and if the people wake up, they're done. I believe the awakening is occurring now. May God bless our efforts. - CL)
Last
week, she raised a storm when, in Toulon, a Mediterranean city with a large
number of citizens of Arab descent, she said Muslims could only be French 'if
they follow customs and a lifestyle that has been shaped by Greek and Roman
influence and 16 centuries of Christianity.'
'We are not a land of Islam,' she said. 'In our country, we don't wear djellaba clothing, we don't wear a veil and we don't impose cathedral-sized mosques.'
'We are not a land of Islam,' she said. 'In our country, we don't wear djellaba clothing, we don't wear a veil and we don't impose cathedral-sized mosques.'
She's Christian, she's blonde, she's attractive, she's
fearless, and she's on the verge of becoming a significant political figure in
France. However, as we're seeing in the USA, the French equivalent of the
bifactional ruling party, who are supposedly such tremendous rivals,
have united to try to stop the nationalists.
The
vote confirms what previous ballots suggested, but which official commentators
did not want to admit – the National movement is without any doubt the first
party in France, but meanwhile it is hardly represented in parliament,’ Marine
Le Pen said.
In a speech to supporters in the early hours today, Ms Le Pen added: ‘It is the only party to defend the authentic French republic the development of our traditions, and the defence of all the French, especially the most vulnerable.’
Marechal-Le Pen, meanwhile, scored above 40 percent in final estimates for the vast Provence-Alpes-Cote-d'Azur region in the south, placing her on course for a landmark win next week.
Both women, however, face an uphill battle to clinch the run-off vote after the Socialist Party withdrew candidates in the key regions and called on its supporters to back conservative rivals.
In a speech to supporters in the early hours today, Ms Le Pen added: ‘It is the only party to defend the authentic French republic the development of our traditions, and the defence of all the French, especially the most vulnerable.’
Marechal-Le Pen, meanwhile, scored above 40 percent in final estimates for the vast Provence-Alpes-Cote-d'Azur region in the south, placing her on course for a landmark win next week.
Both women, however, face an uphill battle to clinch the run-off vote after the Socialist Party withdrew candidates in the key regions and called on its supporters to back conservative rivals.
Now, why would the
Socialist Party be withdrawing its candidates and backing its
"conservative rivals"? For exactly the same reason American
"conservatives" are backing Hillary Clinton rather than Donald Trump.
As detailed in Cuckservative, both socialists and
self-styled "conservatives" are globalists who are virulently opposed
to nationalism and the national interest of every European peoples, including
the American people.
