Has President Donald Trump outsourced foreign policy to
the generals?
So it would seem. Candidate Trump held out his hand to Vladimir
Putin. He rejected further U.S. intervention in Syria other than to smash ISIS.
He spoke of getting out and staying out of the misbegotten
Middle East wars into which Presidents Bush II and Obama had plunged the
country.
President Trump’s seeming renunciation of an
anti-interventionist foreign policy is the great surprise of the first 100
days, and the most ominous. For any new war could vitiate the Trump mandate and
consume his presidency.
Trump no longer calls NATO “obsolete,” but moves U.S. troops
toward Russia in the Baltic and eastern Balkans. Rex Tillerson, holder of
Russia’s Order of Friendship, now warns that the U.S. will not lift sanctions
on Russia until she gets out of Ukraine.
If Tillerson is not bluffing, that would rule out any
rapprochement in the Trump presidency. For neither Putin, nor any successor,
could surrender Crimea and survive.
What happened to the Trump of 2016?
When did Kiev’s claim to Crimea become more crucial to us than a
cooperative relationship with a nuclear-armed Russia? In 1991, Bush I and
Secretary of State James Baker thought the very idea of Ukraine’s independence
was the product of a “suicidal nationalism.”
Where do we think this demonization of Putin and ostracism of
Russia is going to lead?
To get Xi Jinping to help with our Pyongyang problem, Trump has
dropped all talk of befriending Taiwan, backed off Tillerson’s warning to
Beijing to vacate its fortified reefs in the South China Sea, and held out
promises of major concessions to Beijing in future trade deals.
“I like (Xi Jinping) and I believe he likes me a lot,” Trump said
this week. One recalls FDR admonishing Churchill, “I think I can personally
handle Stalin better than … your Foreign Office … Stalin hates the guts of all
your people. He thinks he likes me better.”
FDR did not live to see what a fool Stalin had made of him.
Among the achievements celebrated in Trump’s first 100 days are
the 59 cruise missiles launched at the Syrian airfield from which the gas
attack on civilians allegedly came, and the dropping of the 22,000-pound MOAB
bomb in Afghanistan.
Have
something to say about this column?
Visit Pat's FaceBook page and post your comments….
Visit Pat's FaceBook page and post your comments….
But what did these bombings accomplish?
The War Party seems again ascendant. John McCain and Lindsey Graham
are happy campers. In Afghanistan, the U.S. commander is calling for thousands
more U.S. troops to assist the 8,500 still there, to stabilize an Afghan regime
and army that is steadily losing ground to the Taliban.
Iran is back on the front burner. While Tillerson concedes that
Tehran is in compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal, Trump says it is violating
“the spirit of the agreement.”
How so? Says Tillerson, Iran is “destabilizing” the region, and
threatening U.S. interests in Syria, Yemen, Iraq and Lebanon.
But Iran is an ally of Syria and was invited in to help the
U.N.-recognized government put down an insurrection that contains elements of
al-Qaida and ISIS. It is we, the Turks, Saudis and Gulf Arabs who have been
backing the rebels seeking to overthrow the regime.
In Yemen, Houthi rebels overthrew and expelled a Saudi satrap.
The bombing, blockading and intervention with troops is being done by Saudi and
Sunni Arabs, assisted by the U.S. Navy and Air Force.
It is we and the Saudis who are talking of closing the Yemeni
port of Hodeida, which could bring on widespread starvation.
It was not Iran, but the U.S. that invaded Iraq, overthrew the
Baghdad regime and occupied the country. It was not Iran that overthrew Col.
Gadhafi and created the current disaster in Libya.
Monday, the USS Mahan fired a flare to warn off an Iranian
patrol boat, 1,000 meters away. Supposedly, this was a provocation. But Iranian
foreign minister Javad Zarif had a point when he tweeted:
“Breaking: Our Navy operates in — yes, correct — the Persian
Gulf, not the Gulf of Mexico. Question is what US Navy doing 7,500 miles from
home.”
Who is behind the seeming conversion of Trump to hawk?
The generals, Bibi Netanyahu and the neocons, Congressional
hawks with Cold War mindsets, the Saudi royal family and the Gulf Arabs — they
are winning the battle for the president’s mind.
And their agenda for America?
We are to recognize that our true enemy in the Mideast is not
al-Qaida or ISIS, but Shiite Iran and Hezbollah, Assad’s Syria and his patron,
Putin. And until Hezbollah is eviscerated, Assad is gone, and Iran is smashed
the way we did Afghanistan, Iraq, and Yemen, the flowering of Middle East
democracy that we all seek cannot truly begin.
But before President Trump proceeds along the path laid out for
him by his generals, brave and patriotic men that they are, he should discover
if any of them opposed any of the idiotic wars of the last 15 years, beginning
with that greatest of strategic blunders — George Bush’s invasion of Iraq.