Out on the open ocean, a tsunami
is almost impossible to see; but as the wave gets closer to shore, it builds
and swells and all of a sudden, it becomes extremely obvious. By then, of course, it
is too late.
Consider
what’s happened to Mazda an early warning of what’s coming.
It
is the first major car company to become a four cylinder-only car
company. All of
its 2018 model year cars – from the compact Mazda3 to the full-sized CX-9
(reviewed here)
are powered by four cylinder engines no larger than 2.5 liters.
No
more sixes – even in the Mazda6. Which used
to offer one.
This is the wave of the future – unless
someone (Trump?) rescinds the fatwa issued
by the federal government during the last few month’s of Obama’s presidency.
This fatwadecrees
a near-doubling of the current “corporate average” fuel economy mandatory
minimum from 34.1 to 54.5 miles-per-gallon by the 2025 model year.
There isn’t a six cylinder-powered car on the market that can make
that cut – which is why Mazda isn’t selling them anymore.
Others
are following the example.
For
instance, Honda. The just-redesigned 2018 Accord – which is a mid-sized sedan
that weighs close to 3,400 lbs. – now comes standard with a 1.5 liter “earth
dreams” four. A turbocharged 2.0 liter four – also “earth dreamy” – is
the largest optional engine available.
You
used to be able to buy a V6. No dreams necessary.
The
Chevy Camaro and Ford Mustang have both dropped their formerly standard V6
engines, replacing them with . . . turbocharged fours.
More will follow suit – because there’s no
other option. If they don’t meet the CAFE mandatory minimums, they get hit in
the head with the equivalent of a sock full of quarters – those “gas guzzler”
fines you’ve probably heard of. These are Uncle’s vengeful way of
countermanding what the buying public wants.
Uncle
claims – bizarrely – that CAFE and the “gas guzzler” fines are necessary
because otherwise the mean old car industry would build nothing but “wasteful,”
fuel slurping cars. But no one is forced to buy gas-slurping, “wasteful” cars;
all the car industry can do is offer them for sale. And if no one buys them,
why would the industry continue to offer them?
Isn’t
it pretty obvious that if buyers demanded cars that average 54.5 miles per
gallon, the car companies would respond to that demand?
Why wouldn’t they?
Uncle’s
argument makes no sense.
It’s Uncle – the
government – which is immune to demand. It decrees – and imposes. And it does
so counter to the
demands of the people, yet has the gal to claim it is acting on
their behalf.
Force is Uncle’s stock in
trade.
Uncle’s
concern isn’t that people wouldn’t be able to buy “efficient” cars absent the
CAFE edict. His concern is resentment that
people are still free to choose – and that many people place a higher value on
attributes other than fuel efficiency, such as performance.
His
intention is to deny them that choice – or to punish them for making it.
An
interesting aspect of this is its class regressiveness. CAFE most hurts the
average buyer, the person who might be interested in a middle-priced car such
as a Mazda or a Honda. Such a person’s buying decision is influenced to a
greater degree by a price difference of say $1,000 than the buying decision of
an affluent person shopping for a BMW or Lexus.
BMW,
Lexus and other higher-end car brands – and their customers – can better absorb
the price-jacking effect of CAFE. This is why V8 are still available in
high-priced cars but have been eliminated – or nearly so – from the cars within
the buying power of most middle and working class Americans. Before CAFE,
working and middle class Americans routinely drove full-size cars with V8
engines.
Thanks
to CAFE, such cars have become cars for the rich only.
And
the really scary thing is there’s not four cylinder-powered car on the market
right now that can make the pending 54.5 MPG CAFE cut. Even the hybrid Toyota
Prius falls just short – the current model rates 54 in city driving, 50 in the
highway, so not quite there – so it would actually incur “gas guzzler”
fines under the 54.5 MPG standard.
If
Trump does not rescind the fatwa,
the vehicular landscape is going to be very different in a few years. What
we’re seeing now is just the swell out at sea, before the tsunami approaches
shore.
2025
is only seven years from now. In “product planning” terms, every car on sale
right now will be replaced by a redesigned successor by then. The car companies
are in the decision-making stage right now. What will these 2025 model year
cars be like? That will be decided, to a great extent, by the regulatory fatwasthey will have to
comply with.
If Trump fails to rescind the 54.5 MPG fatwa, the industry
will be faced with the task of figuring out how to nearly double the mileage of
every car they currently sell – or try to sell people cars that have suddenly
become much more expensive to buy, because of all those “gas guzzler” taxes
aded to the MSRP.
Things are coming to a head – and it’ll be obvious, soon.
.
. .
Got a
question about cars – or anything else? Click on the “ask Eric” link and
send ’em in!
If you like
what you’ve found here, please
consider supporting EPautos.
We depend
on you to
keep the wheels turning!
If you
prefer not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
https://www.ericpetersautos.com/2018/01/14/the-wave-builds/
721 Hummingbird Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA 24079
