Your
Geopolitical Quiz for the Day:
Two
countries are embroiled in a ferocious rivalry. One country’s meteoric growth
has put it on a path to become the world’s biggest economic superpower while
the other country appears to be slipping into irreversible decline. Which
country will lead the world into the future?
Country
A builds factories and plants, it employees zillions of people
who manufacture things, it launches massive infrastructure programs, paves
millions of miles of highways and roads, opens new sea lanes, vastly expands
its high-speed rail network, and pumps profits back into productive operations
that turbo-charge its economy and bolster its stature among the nations of the
world.
Country
B has the finest military in the world, it has more than 800
bases scattered across the planet, and spends more on weapons systems and
war-making than all the other nations combined. Country B has gutted its
industrial core, hollowed out its factory base, allowed its vital
infrastructure to crumble, outsourced millions of jobs, off-shored thousands of
businesses, plunged the center of the country into permanent recession,
delivered control of its economy to the Central Bank, and recycled 96 percent
of its corporate and financial profits into a stock buyback scam that sucks
critical capital out of the economy and into the pockets of corrupt Wall Street
plutocrats whose voracious greed is pushing the world towards another
catastrophic meltdown.
Which
of these two countries is going to lead the world into the future? Which of
these two countries offers a path to security and prosperity that doesn’t
involve black sites, extraordinary rendition, extrajudicial assassinations,
color-coded revolutions, waterboarding, strategic disinformation, false-flag
provocations, regime change and perennial war?
China’s
Belt and Road Initiative: A Tectonic Shift in the Geopolitical Balance of Power
Over
the weekend, more than 5,000 delegates from across the world met in Beijing for
The Second Belt and Road Forum For International Cooperation. The conference
provided an opportunity for public and private investors to learn more about Xi
Jinping’s “signature infrastructure project” that is reshaping trade relations
across Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa. According to journalist Pepe
Escobar, “The BRI is now supported by no less than 126 states and territories,
plus a host of international organizations” and will involve “six major
connectivity corridors spanning Eurasia.” The massive development project is
“one of the largest infrastructure and investment projects in history,
….including 65% of the world’s population and 40% of the global gross domestic
product as of 2017.” (Wikipedia) The improvements to road, rail and sea routes
will vastly increase connectivity, lower shipping costs, boost productivity,
and enhance widespread prosperity. The BRI is China’s attempt to replace the
crumbling post-WW2 “liberal” order with a system that respects the rights of
sovereign nations, rejects unilateralism, and relies on market-based principles
to effect a more equitable distribution of wealth. The Belt and Road Initiative
is China’s blueprint for a New World Order. It is the face of 21st century
capitalism.
The
prestigious event in Beijing was barely covered by the western media which sees
the project as a looming threat to US plans to pivot to Asia and become the
dominant player in the most prosperous and populous region in the world.
Growing international support for the Chinese roadmap suggests that
Washington’s hegemonic ambitions are likely to be short-circuited by an aggressive
development agenda that eclipses anything the US is currently doing or plans to
do in the foreseeable future.
The
Chinese plan will funnel trillions of dollars into state of the art
transportation projects that draw the continents closer together in a webbing
of high-speed rail and energy pipelines (Russia). Far-flung locations in
Central Asia will be modernized while standards of living will steadily rise.
By creating an integrated economic space, in which low tariffs and the free
flow of capital help to promote investment, the BRI initiative will produce the
world’s biggest free trade zone, a common market in which business is
transacted in Chinese or EU currency. There will be no need to trade in USD’s
despite the dollar’s historic role as the world’s reserve currency. The shift
in currencies will inevitably increase the flow of dollars back to the United
States increasing the already-ginormous $22 trillion dollar National Debt while
precipitating an excruciating period of adjustment.
Chinese
and Russian leaders are taking steps to “harmonize” their two economic
initiatives, the Belt and Road and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). This
will be a challenging task as the expansion of infrastructure implies
compatibility between leaders, mutual security guarantees, new rules and
regulations for the common economic space, and supranational political
structures to oversee trade, tariffs, foreign investment and immigration.
Despite the hurtles, both Putin and Xi appear to be fully committed to their
vision of economic integration which they see as based on the “unconditional
adherence to the primacy of national sovereignty and the central role of the
United Nations.”
It
comes at no surprise that US powerbrokers see Putin’s plan as a significant
threat to their regional ambitions, in fact, former Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton admitted as much in 2012 when she said, “It’s going to be called a
customs union, it will be called the Eurasian Union and all of that, but let’s
make no mistake about it. We know what the goal is and we are trying to figure
out effective ways to slow down or prevent it.” Washington opposes any free
trade project in which it is excluded or cannot control. Both the EEU and the
BRI fall into that category.
The
United States continues to demonize countries that simply want to use the
market to improve the lives of their people and increase their prospects for
prosperity. Washington’s hostile approach is both misguided and
counterproductive. Competition should be seen as a way to improve productivity
and lower costs, not as a threat to over-bloated, inefficient industries that
have outlived their usefulness. Here’s an excerpt from an article that Putin
wrote in 2011. It helps to show that Putin is not the scheming tyrant he is
made out to be in the western media, but a free market capitalist who
enthusiastically supports globalization:
“For the first time in the history of humanity, the world is
becoming truly global, in both politics and economics. A central part of this
globalization is the growing importance of the Asia-Pacific region as compared
to the EuroAtlantic world in the global economy. Asia’s rise is lifting with it
the economies of countries outside Asia that have managed to latch onto the
“Asian economic engine”….The US has also effectively hitched itself to this
“engine”, creating an economic and financial network with China and other
countries in the region…
The “supercontinent” of Eurasia is home to two-thirds of the
world’s population and produces over 60 percent of its economic output. Because
of the dramatic opening of China and the former Soviet Union to the world,
almost all the countries in Eurasia are becoming more economically,
politically, and culturally interdependent. …
There is huge potential for development in infrastructure, in
spite of some formidable bottlenecks. …A unified and homogeneous common power
market stretching from Lisbon to Hanoi via Vladivostok is not necessary,
because electric power markets do not function in that way. But the creation of
infrastructure that could support a number of regional and sub-regional common
markets would do much for the economic development of Greater Eurasia.”
(Russian newspaper, Izvestia, 2011)
Keep
in mind, the article was written back in 2011 long before Xi had even conjured
up his grand pan-Asia infrastructure scheme. Putin was already a committed
capitalist looking for ways to put the Soviet era behind him and skillfully use
the markets to build his nation’s power and prosperity. Regrettably, he has
been blocked at every turn. Washington does not want others to effectively use
the markets. Washington wants to threaten, bully, sanction and harass its
competitors so that outcomes can be controlled and more of the world’s wealth
can be skimmed off the top by the noncompetitive, monopolistic corporate
behemoths that diktat foreign policy to their political underlings (in congress
and the White House) and who see rivals as blood enemies that must be ground
into dust.
Is
it any wonder why Russia and China have emerged as Washington’s biggest
enemies? It has nothing to do with the fictitious claims of election meddling
or so-called “hostile behavior” in the South China Sea. That’s nonsense.
Washington is terrified that the Russo-Chinese economic integration plan will
replace the US-dominated “liberal” world order, that cutting edge
infrastructure will create an Asia-Europe super-continent that no longer trades
in dollars or recirculates profits into US debt instruments. They are afraid
that an expansive free trade zone that extends from Lisbon to Vladivostok will
inevitably lead to new institutions for lending, oversight and governance. They
are afraid that a revamped 21st century capitalism will result in more
ferocious competition for their clunker corporations, less opportunity for
unilateralism and meddling, and a rules-based system where the playing field is
painstakingly kept level. That’s what scares Washington.
The
Belt and Road Initiative and the Eurasian Economic Union represent the changing
of the guard. The US-backed ‘neoliberal’ model of globalisation is being
rejected everywhere, from the streets of Paris, to Brexit, to the rise of right
wings groups across Europe, to the unexpected election of Donald Trump in 2016.
The Russo-Chinese model is built on a more solid, and less extractive,
foundation. This new vision anticipates an interconnected multipolar world
where the rules governing commerce are decided by the participants, where the
rights of every state are respected equally, and where the new guarantors for
regional security scrupulously keep the peace. It is this vision of
‘revitalized capitalism’ that Washington sees as its mortal enemy.
