And it's every bit as bad as the most skeptical observers have assumed it would be:
“If I can show you that one major thing that governments around
the world are telling the people is a lie, you should take my 32 years of
experienced opinion that says, most of it, if not all of it, is a lie. The most
different variant is only 0.3% different from the original sequence as emailed
out of Wuhan in … January 2020. 0.3% [is] the one [variant] that is the most
different on the planet so far. And now another way of saying it is, ‘all of
the variants are not less than 99.7% identical to each other.’
“Now, you might be thinking, ‘hmm, .3%, is that enough [to
escape immunity and become more dangerous]?’ The answer is no. Get away, ya
know, get out of here …
“The human immune system is a thing of wonder. What it does is
when it faces a new pathogen like this, you’ve got professional cells, they’re
called professional antigen-presenting cells —they’re kind of rough tough
things that tend not to succumb to viruses. And their job is to grab foreign
things in the near environment and tear them limb from limb [inside the cell].
They really cut them up into hundreds of pieces. And then they present these
pieces on the surfaces of their cell to other bits of your immune system, and
amazingly, because of the variability that God and nature gave you, huge
variability to recognize foreign things, and your body ends up using 15 to 20
different specific motifs that it spots about this virus. They’re called
epitopes, basically they’re just like little photographs of the details about
this virus. That’s what they do. And that is what is called your repertoire,
your immune repertoire is like 20 different accurate photographs, close-ups, of
different bits of this virus.
“Now, if a tiny piece of the virus changes, like the .3% I’ve
just described, if you are reinfected by that variant, your professional cells
tear into that virus and cut it into pieces, present them again, and lo and
behold, most of the pieces that you have already seen and recognized, are still
there in the variants.
“There is absolutely no chance that all of them will fail to be
recognized and that is what is required for immune escape, to escape your
immunity. It must present to you as a new pathogen. It must be sufficiently
different that, when it is cut up by your professional checker cells, it won’t
find mostly the same thing it has seen before. And that is just absurdly
impossible when you have only varied .3%, so it is 99.7% (similar).
“You can go and check that by looking at papers by a person
called Alison Tarke. There is also Shane Crotty, and all of the other
co-authors.
“And before them, coming from my theoretical understanding of
multi-locus immunity, which is what I just badly tried to describe, to what
actually happens … If your [immune system] is presented with something that
contains even half of those similar pieces, there is no way your body will say,
‘that’s a new pathogen. And, so, the idea that 0.3% could even have a chance of
getting around immunity is just a lie. It’s not [even] like an opinion
difference.’
What this medical research scientist believes on the basis of
his experience is that the danger is less in the current not-vaccines, but
rather in the system of "top-up shots" that will bypass the testing
processes and be administered on an ongoing basis, which in combination with
"vaccine passports" will permit population control measures to be
secretly enacted at any time.
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/04/a-pfizer-vp-explains-plan.html
