The Jabs Must Be BANNED
[Comments enabled]
... in those
under 18 and strongly discouraged in healthy adults
under 50.
Those who promoted them in
people under the age of 30 in addition must face justice.
There was never any science supporting it on a
risk:benefit basis.
The CDC
documents about 35 total Covid-related
deaths in people under the age of 18 years all the way back to March of 2020.
This table is utterly gob-smacking damnable and is
what we get for "Warp Speed" -- a litany of serious harms,
many of which will wind up as deaths -- more deaths in those under 18 than
Covid caused.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?get_gallery=10932
The experience
.vs. expected rate is anywhere from ten to one hundred times higher than
"random chance" in those under 24 years old, and form 3-30 times
higher in those under 30.
If we presume
that one in ten of these cases will eventually kill the person
involved, which is likely conservative (the usual expectation
is that half of these cases in the population generally that
result in hospitalization eventually progress to heart failure and either a
transplant or death within five years) these "side
effects" will kill more people in the under-25 group than Covid has all
the way back to the start of the pandemic. The others, who are
not killed, will wind up with monstrous medical bills they
will have to pay and some amount of permanent damage to their cardiac
health.
This is
from one side effect alone.
Only those over
50 have an incidence of this result that is inline with expectations; everyone
younger is either at or beyond the upper boundary.
In addition
this data is almost-certainly incomplete as VAERS is a non-mandatory system and
thus does not capture all events. The degree of under-reporting
is not able to be accurately bracketed but that it occurs is an absolute fact.
Therefore these reports are floors, not ceilings, and as such must
be taken as a lower boundary only, yet even in that context they
demonstrate utterly unacceptable risk that, in any ordinary civil
proceeding would lead to strict liability.
THESE SHOTS
MUST BE IMMEDIATELY STOPPED FOR ALL HEALTHY PERSONS UNDER THE AGE OF 30
and strongly recommended against up to the age of 50
years unless the person receiving them has a serious morbid
condition and has been tested negative for prior exposure to
the virus itself.
That the CDC delayed this meeting
for "Juneteenth" ought to get people imprisoned; this is
an immediate emergency action item and to postpone it was utterly indefensible.
Any college administration that
continues to hold forth a "requirement" for these shots in
students should have their children put up as collateral to
face the same outcome as any of the students who die as
a result of these jabs, with said bond being good for the next ten years since
myocarditis often leads to heart failure with the next five
years in people it strikes. If you coerced some young
person to get the jab and they get hammered you should forfeit your own
children's lives as you are the reason they got ****ed.
Administration of these shots to a
previously-recovered person under 50 is, on the strength of this data, gross
negligence and, if they get hit, attempted manslaughter or, if
the person ultimately suffers heart failure, actual manslaughter. And
no, gross negligence is not covered by the
"immunity" that HHS gave the vaccine manufacturers and health
professionals; any person or organization administering such a shot to someone
who is healthy and under 30 should be immediately sued as
their so-called "protection" is presumptively void.
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=242766
