In
my last article, “The Deplorables – Who We Are And What We Want,” I
examined the basic philosophies that define what I call the liberty movement;
the same group of Americans that Hillary Clinton admonishes as part of her
“basket of deplorables.”
It is important to recognize that only foolish progressives
actually take Clinton’s claims at face value. Clinton seeks to characterize a
large subset of conservatives as narrow-minded when she mentions the “deplorables.”
But, it is how she defines “narrow-minded” that is the crux of the thing.
When people like her talk about “racists,” they are referring to
conservatives who want a secure southern border. When they talk about
“Islamaphobes,” they are referring to people who want to stop Islamic refugees
from being bused into the country without being vetted or philosophically and
morally acclimated to our way of life. When they talk about sexists, they are
usually referring to all males in general, because remember, social justice
warriors (SJWs) claim that we are “subconsciously sexist,” even if we think we
are fair to women. When they talk about homophobes, they are referring to
Christian bakers who do not want to participate in services for gay weddings
despite the fact that they should be perfectly free to refuse association with
anyone at any time for any reason.
What Clinton and social justice lunatics are really referring to
when they use these attacks are those people who want to be free to think and
do as they see fit as long as they are not violating the constitutional rights
of others. No one in Hillary’s basket is actually narrow-minded, but she and
her cronies pigeonhole them as narrow-minded anyway.
Clinton is not actually worried about real racists, or real
sexists or real homophobes. What she and the establishment are worried about
are true conservatives, because our principles are not built on hate; they are
built on reason and truth. It’s easy to defeat a movement driven by hate; it’s
next to impossible to defeat a movement driven by truth.
It is absolutely essential for liberty activists to understand
that the goal of the establishment will be to redefine the core of our
movement. If they can repaint us as hateful, then we can be beaten. If they can
fool us into acting against our principles in the name of winning by any means,
then once again, we can be beaten. If we are able to retain our principles and
repel the propaganda, then we will NEVER be beaten. Even the greatest war
machines on Earth can be crushed by the force of a principled rebellion.
As my
readers know well, I do not hold much optimism for America in the short term.
Our economic status is dismal. In my article, “Brexit Aftermath – Here’s What Happens Next,” I
warned that global markets would be experiencing a slow grinding decline into
the U.S. elections. This is now occurring. It is my belief that international
financiers and central banks will pull stimulus support from the global economy
just before or just after the elections. I believe that the establishment will
attempt to blame conservative movements for the fiscal crisis they created.
By extension, and as I have been predicting for many months, I
believe that Donald Trump will be allowed into the White House. Whether Trump
is aware of this dynamic or not, I do not know. The point is, our fight is just
beginning, and it has nothing to do with a Trump presidency.
The U.S. cannot be saved from the financial crisis; instability
is a mathematical certainty. It is how we respond to this instability
that will determine our success or failure. Here is what we “deplorables”
must accomplish in the next decade if we are to rebuild America and defeat
globalism.
Put An
End To Economic Harmonization
Economic harmonization is nothing more than a globalist phrase
meaning the socialist redistribution of wealth. Globalists and progressives
will assert that capitalism is the cause of all our ailments. They will say it
leads to an unfair allocation of wealth into the coffers of a select few
through the “natural” evolution of corporate power. In reality, most socialist
nations work side by side with corporations, and even the existence of the
legal corporate model is owed to government interference in free markets. That
is to say, there is nothing natural about corporations.
It was western governments that fabricated special legal
protections for corporations including corporate personhood and limited
liability. Without government protection, corporations could not exist at their
current level of dominance. Therefore, bigger government and more government
intervention in free markets will likely only serve to secure even greater
empires for the corporate elite.
These empires can only be dismantled by removing government as a
factor in free markets and allowing true competition in business to return
instead of corporate favoritism. As a part of this shift, the middle class must
be allowed to thrive through innovation and production. Taxation designed to
redistribute wealth only seems to harm burgeoning entrepreneurs and stifles
their ability to use good ideas to compete with larger businesses and their
superior capital.
Economic harmonization will eventually result in equality — it
will make everyone equally poor. Only a handful of elites will ever be able to
pursue economic success within this kind of framework.
The End
Of Forced Multiculturalism
We’re tired of Cloward-Piven strategies used by cultural
Marxists to undermine western principles and heritage. The bottom line is, some
cultures are completely incompatible and they should not be roommates. Are we
racist for holding this view? No, we’re just being practical. One look at the
scheisse-storm hitting Europe right now and only an idiot or a Leftist with an
agenda would argue that mass immigration of contrary cultures is a good idea.
Uncontrolled migrations of peoples from socialist nations into
nations that desire free markets will only make the effort towards free markets
impossible. Illegal immigration by people who only want taxpayer-funded
entitlements and that import their socialist ideals as they invade is counter
to the health of a liberty-based model.
Harshly theocratic cultures also will not be able to integrate
into a society that respects individual freedom. Social justice groups assume
that religious freedom requires us to remain apathetic in the face of unchecked
theocratic immigration (as long as it is anything other than Christian).
But, potential immigrants and illegal immigrants do not have legal rights under
the U.S. Constitution. Religious freedom has nothing to do with immigration.
For example, fundamentalist Islamic culture does not mix with
the traditional Western ideals of liberty and free market participation.
Period.
Leftists are willfully blind to the distinction. Globalists
understand the problem full well and they intend to exploit it. Their goal is
to import counter-ideologies en masse in order to annihilate the last vestiges
of the West.
Why? Because this is about eliminating the final obstacle to
total globalization. They seek to wash out conservative and classical liberal
thinking to make way for a collectivist system that outlaws sovereign
philosophies as “barbaric.” It is not exactly an “ethnic cleansing;” more like
an ideological cleansing of true conservativism.
We aren’t going to allow that.
This is why many in the liberty movement do in fact support a
ban on all immigration into Western nations until the damage done by the
multicultural cabal can be mitigated. Some may argue for a limited ban on the
immigration of certain groups (including Muslims) and this is an issue where
the “deplorables” diverge.
I personally don’t know how such a selective ban could be
enforced without an insanely large, intrusive and expensive immigration
bureaucracy designed to investigate and weed out millions of people not allowed
under such a law. A simpler solution would be to freeze ALL immigration for a
period of time (perhaps 10 years or more).
This would eliminate the need for the U.S. Citizenship And
Immigration Services (USCIS). The $3.2 billion allocated to that entity could
be spent better securing U.S. borders.
Frankly, there is nothing wrong with denying citizenship to
immigrants for a period of time. The extreme left acts as if open immigration
into our country is some kind of human right. It’s not.
A Less
Inclusive Republican Party
It is perfectly healthy to be discriminating against ideologies
and people that are destructive to inherent freedoms. I remember after Barack
Obama took office for a second term that the common argument by Democratic and
Republican elites alike was that it was “time for the Republican Party to be
more inclusive” if they ever wanted to win the White House again. What that
really means in translation is, it was time for the Republican Party to move
completely away from conservative values and be more like the Left.
In reality, the Republican Party needs to stop accommodating
socialist and globalist ideals and be more selective about who its friends are,
and who its leaders are. Either that or the party needs to go the way of
smallpox and die so that more honest political organizations can take its
place.
The
Eradication Of Language Policing
We “deplorables” have seen political correctness and social
justice fear mongering turn our society into a simpering cesspool of terrified
effeminate spineless men, deluded miserable vitriolic women who think they are
men, and the rest of us who are supposed to walk on eggshells whenever the PC
police are around while being sure to use the “proper pronouns.” I think not.
I think instead, the deplorables are going to say whatever the
hell we feel like saying. Why should we concern ourselves with the irrational
feelings of others? Why should we censor ourselves just to satisfy the ignorant
notion that language shapes environment? Language is irrelevant to our internal
monolog. Changing the language is not going to change our souls. Thus,
controlling it is pointless and only serves to oppress the public.
We’re not going to refer to anyone by a gender other than what
their genetics dictate. We don’t care if you wear make-up and a wig and a
tampon. If you were born with a Y chromosome, then you are a man. Your personal
freedoms do not include the right to force others to recognize you as a woman,
a “trans,” a diva, a porpoise, etc. Your feelings do not matter. We are no
longer going to participate in your gender role-play fantasies.
Some of us may at times play with race-related jokes and have fun
at the expense of other groups. We might argue that women actually don’t make
very good Ghostbusters or that movies pontificating about slavery are becoming
extraordinarily boring. We will probably refer to illegal immigrants as illegal
immigrants and stare at beautiful women like we have x-ray vision.
Understand, there is nothing you can do to stop us, so you might
as well spend your time doing something more constructive, like dropping out of
gender studies and enrolling in a real college course.
No More
Recognition Of Victim Group Status
For decades now it has become trendy for anyone besides white
heterosexual males to blame all their failures on white heterosexual males.
With all the gnashing of teeth over “white male privilege,” we might forget
that the only groups with privileges under the law are victim groups. So much
government preference is being given to these groups that almost everyone is
now clamoring to categorize themselves as a victim in some sense.
The “transgender” movement is the culmination of this insanity;
primarily because there is no such thing as a transgender person except the
extremely rare occasion when someone is born with both male and female
genitalia. Gender is biological, it is not fluid. You cannot argue with nature
about your gender. Laws that govern gender issues should follow biological
standards, not hollow psychological standards.
Today, anyone can simply say they are a victim group by virtue
of what amounts to a mental illness. It is time to stop treating this mental illness
as a civil rights issue. In turn, it is also time to stop the government from
designating privileges to groups based on arbitrary victimhood. Everyone today
has equal rights under the law. Everything else should be based on merit. If
you fail, then it is your own fault. To foster the notion in our society that
the evil white man is to blame for all the inadequacies of every loser in the
world is to do more harm to those losers than good. Instead, let them take
responsibility for their failings so that they might actually strive to do
better.
Limited
Government
There are only a few reasonable purposes behind government — to
defend the inborn liberties of the populace, to repel foreign invaders and to
secure a sound monetary framework. That’s about it. But while we deplorables
see these as limited powers and responsibilities, socialists and globalists see
these as excuses for an infinitely expanding government behemoth.
For example, you can build a functioning military based on the
militia model, in which every able-bodied citizen rises to the defense of their
community and nation in the event of an attack. This would be a cost-effective
and less intrusive model.
Or, you can build a massive standing army with hundreds of bases
around the world and a police state here at home, all funded by an
unsustainable fiat money and debt system. This would be the big government
model, which socialists argue is what government should do to fulfill its role.
The government can also be used to force private associations in
the name of protecting the “rights” of others. A Christian taxpayer might be
forced to fund entities they oppose, like Planned Parenthood (which receives
around $500 million in tax dollars per year). This is the problem with
open-ended nanny government; the individual freedom to associate is violated in
the name of protecting the victim status of others.
This comes from a “fluid interpretation” of the Constitution and
the role of government that allows expansion to be rationalized. To put an end
to this would require we “deplorables” to assert a literal and limited
interpretation.
True Free
Markets
The establishment has spent the better part of the past 30 years
trying to convince the world that globalism is a natural extension of the free
market. It’s not. The fact is, globalism is a system thrust upon the people,
not an organic evolution of economics.
True free market philosophy would dictate that if a model is
destroying the wealth standards of a society, that society would naturally
abandon it. If a model is elevating corporations, which are a product of
government charter and are artificially supported by taxpayer dollars, then
this is not conducive to real competition. If a model is allowing those same
government chartered corporations to export jobs while destroying any chance
for smaller competitors to fill the void through unfair taxation and other
laws, then this creates economic instability. Without government intervention,
globalism would not exist, because no society with a free market would
naturally seek to destroy itself.
The “deplorables” want the end of all welfare, including
corporate welfare and the concept of the “too big to fail” company. We want the
end of government intervention in business and special favors for corporate
elites. We also want the end of central banking and fiat debt based currency.
It’s funny, but the mainstream media constantly accuses us of seeking an unfair
world, but we are actually the only group of people working on a level playing
field.
This concept terrifies progressives and corporate elites alike
because without a socialist welfare system and special treatment for victim
groups and companies, all success would then rely on merit. This means they
would have to work harder than most, or be smarter than most or be more
naturally gifted than most in order to be more prosperous than most. Take a
look at the millennials permeating the halls of universities
today — those that espouse socialist ideals –and you will find
yourself struggling to identify a single person with exceptional merit or work
ethic.
Take a look at all the banks and corporate monstrosities that
should have collapsed eight years ago due to terrible business
practices. Under a free market, they would be failures, and rightly so.
As mentioned in my first article on the “deplorables,” these
changes– which represent a redress of grievances over decades of American
corruption –will not take place without years of struggle and sacrifice.
Again, this is not about a Trump presidency or any other future election. This
is about action on the part of regular men and women, average conservatives,
every day. This is about self-sufficiency, localized economies, the return of
individual producers, the refusal to comply with social justice-based laws and
legislation, the return of community-based security rather than reliance on
state and federal security, local efforts for border security, the punishment
of criminal financial institutions, etc.; all of which will probably come at
the cost of a fight with the establishment.
While you are welcome to vote for whatever candidate you please,
remember that central leadership is not the solution. Self-leadership is the
solution. We do not need a hero on a white horse. The future is in OUR hands.
Only by the efforts of millions of liberty champions in large and small ways
can America return to prosperity, and to freedom.
