In Washington,
President Trump announced that environmental regulations are “out of control” –
and promised to get them back under control.
In Paris, Mayor
Anne Hidalgo (which sounds about as French as fries) has issued a fatwa banning
diesel-powered cars built before model year 2001 – and is hoping to ban them
all the way through model year 2005.
That’s 3.2
million cars (14 percent of the vehicle fleet) rendered economically obsolete
by legislative edict. Imagine if you owned one of those 3.2 million. Your car
now worthless to you.
Or to anyone
else.
A similar thing
would no doubt have occurred in Washington had the election gone a different
way. It turns out they do have consequences; your vote does matter.
Libertarians (I
am one) need to grok this.
We do not live
in a perfect world and are likely never to experience such. Even if we could
Jesus Hoover all the Clovers off the surface of the Earth and deposit them on
Planet Clover. Because some of us would have kids and some of those kids would
inevitably turn out to be Clovers, too. Plus, we Libertarians are far from
unanimous on things.
The point is,
who can doubt that we would not be hearing the words, “out of control” and
“environmentalism” coming out of the mouth of a President Clinton?
I took flak
before the election for urging that Libertarians vote for Trump, arguing that
the alternative was far worse. The contrast between Washington and Paris at
this moment bears this judgment out.
Trump has
issued a regulatory freeze – just days after his inauguration. Had someone else
been inaugurated, the likelihood is there would have been a slew of new
regulations – to combat “climate change.” Trump has appointed a skeptic of
“climate change” to head the EPA. That is, a person who does not believe in a
static climate. He perhaps has noticed there are sometimes hot days and
sometimes cold days. And that perhaps this occurred before the first Otto Cycle
engine burped C02 into the ether.
He may have
opened a book and learned that the air we breath is mostly – overwhelmingly –
nitrogen. 78 percent, in fact. With the next largest slice of the pie being
oxygen (21 percent) and then a very thin slice being C02 (about .03
percent) and the rest traces of other gases.
Now consider
the fraction added to the mix by “human activity.”
It’s enough to
make one. . . skeptical.
And now we have
a president who appears to be.
This is good
news.
Even better
news would be to open the papers tomorrow and learn that Trump has rescinded
the regulatory fatwa issued by Lame Duck Barry in the last weeks of his
presidency that officially classified C02 as an “exhaust emission” subject to
regulation (more here). Lame Duck Barry did this a full year ahead of the
deadline for a decision (2018) because he feared the “skeptics” might come to a
different decision.
Lame Duck Barry
being a good democrat (lower case) you see.
Of all the
regulations Trump must stand athwart and call Halt! to, this one’s the most
potentially deadly. Not to the Earth – as Lame Duck Barry and Co. assert will
happen, if that happens. But to economic activity in this country. It is
possible to clean up a car’s exhaust to nearly nil (this has already been done)
and thereby clean up the air (which it is and has been for decades).
What is not
possible is to reduce the volume of carbon dioxide coming out of the tailpipe –
without reducing the amount of internal combustion going on under the hood. The
engineering object of the past more than 40 years has been to convert the
gaseous results of internal combustion from reactive to inert compounds . . .
from smog-forming things like unburned hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen
into . . . water vapor and carbon dioxide. Which now constitute the bulk
of vehicle exhaust, more than 95 percent of it.
But carbon
dioxide can’t be converted into other gasses. And why would you want to? It is
non-reactive. It does not cause or contribute to smog or to acid rain or to
asthma or to allergies or to any human health problem. It does, however,
“contribute” to mental health problems. The mere thinking of it induces what
used be called neurasthenia in people who are… neurotic.
Or at least,
gullible.
If Lame Duck
Barry or his anointed (but not elected) successor truly did believe in “climate
change” then why don’t they change their habits? How large is the home Barry
The Ex has moved into? How large is Hillary’s “carbon footprint”? Why does Al
Gore drive a Cadillac Escalade? It is a thread of indecency running through
them all that the “change” they insist is necessary doesn’t begin at home.
It begins – and
ends – in our homes.
Trump appears
to be a heretic; he does not believe. And much more encouraging, he is not
insisting that “change” be imposed on us. This also makes him dangerous. Not to
us. To the regulatory apparat as well as the power apparat.
If he follows
through, he may not live. I believe it is that serious. They know what the
stakes are. All their Jenga castles are on the verge of toppling. A similar
thing happened a long time ago when another president suggested that perhaps
the Cold War was not good for America and that maybe Congress rather than a
private banking cartel ought to issue the nation’s currency, without charging
interest to the American people.
But, for now,
there is hope.
And possibly,
change.
If you like
what you’ve found here, please consider supporting EPautos.
We depend on
you to keep the wheels turning! Especially this month; we’re low – see the pie
chart on the main page.
Our donate
button is here.
If you prefer
not to use PayPal, our mailing address is:
EPautos
721 Hummingbird
Lane SE
Copper Hill, VA
24079
