Why is the government of the Dutch, some of the nicest,
most polite and highly civilized people on earth, pushing an agenda of imposing
death on people who have committed no crimes? They don’t even execute
heinous criminals there. In fact the Dutch first abolished
capital punishment for crimes
in 1870, though they revived for a few war criminals following World War II,
and then revived the ban. So who does the Dutch government want to kill? Two
types of people.
The
Netherlands has committed $10 million for an initiative to replace funding for
abortion services in developing countries that will be lost due to U.S.
President Donald Trump's ban on financing foreign groups that provide
abortions.
Trump
reinstated a policy on Monday requiring overseas organizations that receive
U.S. family-planning funds to certify they do not perform abortions or provide
abortion advice as a method of family planning.
The
Netherlands, which has some of the world's most liberal laws on reproductive
health, said earlier this week the fund would seek donations from other
governments, charities and companies as well as individuals.
Dutch
officials estimate that the U.S. ban, which was condemned by women's rights and
health campaigners, will cause a funding shortfall of $600 million over the
next four years
…
in the Netherlands, some patients have been euthanized who have never asked for
it, a killing procedure known as “termination without request or consent.” (snip)
A
woman signed an advance directive to be killed “at the right time” due to
Alzheimer’s. But when the decision to kill her was made, she fought the lethal
jab, so the death doctor had the family hold the struggling woman down so she
could finish the homicide. Despite this blatant imposing of death, the
doctor was cleared of wrongdoing by euthanasia authorities. From The Telegraph
story: A Dutch woman doctor who asked an elderly patient’s family to hold her
down while she administered a fatal drug dose has been cleared under Holland’s
euthanasia laws. Mailonline reported that the patient fought desperately in an
attempt not to be killed. Jacob Kohnstamm, chairman of the Regional Review
Committee, which considered the case, said: “I am convinced that the doctor
acted in good faith, and we would like to see more clarity on how such cases
are handled in the future.”
He accurately sums up:
Permitting
killing as an answer to human suffering changes a culture radically over time.
It diminishes the perceived inherent value of human life. Eventually, horrific
acts become justified as “compassion.”
Exactly. Don’t forget that the Nazis believed (or at least
said) that they were being compassionate in putting “defective” out of their
misery, as well as being compassionate for others who would have a burden
supporting all these “useless” people.
