Was Arizona airport tarmac meeting between Bill
Clinton and Loretta Lynch the beginning of Obamagate leaks?
How much did Hillary Clinton know,
regarding the Trump Tower wiretaps and FISA warrants (assuming they existed)?
What we know: The first FISA request came right after former Attorney General Loretta
Lynch met with Bill Clinton on the airport tarmac in Phoenix Arizona on June of
2016.
The first FISA request was denied.
A week later FBI Director James Comey
exonerated Hillary Clinton from further investigation saying…
“Our judgment is that no reasonable
prosecutor would bring such a case.”
We also know (via various news reports)
that a second FISA request was submitted in October of 2016 just
before the US elections.
On October 31st, then Presidential candidate
Hillary Clinton sent out a tweet saying that ‘computer scientists have
uncovered a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based
server’.
Was Hillary Clinton tipped off to the
wiretapping right before to the November 8th election?
More via The Gateway Pundit…
We now know that the meeting between Bill
Clinton and Attorney General Lynch occurred at about the same time that the
Obama administration filed a request with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Court (FISA) to monitor communications involving Donald Trump and several
advisers.
Fast forward to October 2016.
Wikileaks began releasing emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta,
rolling out batches every day until the election, creating new
mini-scandals. These emails were virtually ignored by the mainstream
media who were in the bag for Democrat Hillary Clinton but were
spread widely by websites that chose to share the truth like this one.
At the same time, The Obama administration
submitted a new, narrow request to the FISA court, now focused on a computer
server in Trump Tower suspected of links to Russian banks.
No evidence is found — but the wiretaps
continued, ostensibly for national security reasons, Andrew McCarthy at
National Review later notes.
The Obama administration was monitoring
an opposing presidential campaign using the high-tech surveillance powers of
the federal intelligence services.
At about this same time the leaks started
coming. Liberal website Slate posted a report on
October 31st titled: Was a Trump Server Communicating With Russia? The
subtitle to the post read: “This spring, a group of computer scientists set
out to determine whether hackers were interfering with the Trump campaign. They
found something they weren’t expecting.”
The article shared a story of innocent
‘anonymous’ hackers who went searched the net and found the following:
In late July, one of these scientists—who
asked to be referred to as Tea Leaves, a pseudonym that would protect his
relationship with the networks and banks that employ him to sift their
data—found what looked like malware emanating from Russia. The destination
domain had Trump in its name, which of course attracted Tea Leaves’ attention.
But his discovery of the data was pure happenstance—a surprising needle in a
large haystack of DNS lookups on his screen. “I have an outlier here that
connects to Russia in a strange way,” he wrote in his notes. He couldn’t quite
figure it out at first. But what he saw was a bank in Moscow that kept
irregularly pinging a server registered to the Trump Organization on Fifth
Avenue.
The creative article went on to try and paint
a connection with now President Trump:
The researchers had initially stumbled in
their diagnosis because of the odd configuration of Trump’s server. “I’ve never
seen a server set up like that,” says Christopher Davis, who runs the cybersecurity
firm HYAS InfoSec Inc. and won a FBI Director Award for Excellence for his work
tracking down the authors of one of the world’s nastiest botnet attacks. “It looked weird, and it
didn’t pass the sniff test.” The server was first registered to Trump’s business
in 2009 and was set up to run consumer marketing campaigns. It had a
history of sending mass emails on behalf of Trump-branded properties and
products. Researchers were ultimately convinced that the server indeed belonged
to Trump. (Click here to see the server’s registration record.)
But now this capacious server handled a strangely small load of traffic, such a
small load that it would be hard for a company to justify the expense and
trouble it would take to maintain it. “I get more mail in a day than the server
handled,” Davis says.
Here is Hillary Clinton’s tweet from
October 31st…
(See website)
The Gateway Pundit further adds…
Connect the dots, folks. This was a well
coordinated attack on a Presidential candidate. AG Lynch met with Bill Clinton
just before the first FISA request.
After they were successful with the second
FISA request in October, it appears Bill Clinton passed on the information to
his wife to help her win the election. This scandal is about to blow wide open;
it’s not going away any time soon. Stay tuned…
This work is licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
