I look at the coronavirus
crisis differently from most people. To me, it’s the reopening of a
150-year-old scientific controversy that much of the western world has
forgotten.
French scientist Louis Pasteur (1822-1895) is widely celebrated as “the
father of germ theory”— the idea that we become sick when our bodies are
invaded by foreign organisms such as bacteria, molds, fungi, and of course
viruses. Although the idea had been circulating long before Pasteur achieved
eminence, his laboratory work in the 1860s appeared to provide the scientific
proof that had previously been missing.
What’s not widely known is that other French scientists working in the
same field in that era held somewhat different beliefs, known as the “terrain
theory”. They believed that the most important factor that determines whether
or not a person becomes ill is not the presence of a germ, but rather the
preparedness of the body’s internal environment (the “soil” or terrain) to
repel or destroy the germ.
One of the main terrain-theory
scientists was Antoine Béchamp (1816-1908). Pasteur and Béchamp were bitter
rivals over several scientific issues. The book Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter (R.
B. Pearson, 1942) even suggests that Pasteur plagiarized some of his work from
Béchamp—no doubt a sore point with the latter, who ultimately died in
obscurity. Pasteur, by contrast, became a skilled self-promoter who literally
managed to make his name a household word long past the time of his death.
The
other main proponent of the terrain theory was Claude Bernard (1813-1878), who (notwithstanding
their differences of opinion on scientific issues) was a close friend and
associate of Pasteur’s. At the end of his life, Pasteur is said to have
recognized the importance of what Bernard had been trying to tell him,
remarking, “Bernard avait raison. Le germ
n’est rien, c’est le terrain qui est tout.” (Bernard was right. The
germ is nothing, it’s the soil that is everything.)
In 1982, French scholar
Marie Nonclercq published her doctoral thesis on Béchamp,
alleging that Pasteur was not only a plagiarist but also a fraud and falsifier
of experimental data. But regardless of Pasteur’s character, and regardless of
whether he recanted at the end or not, what lives on after him is the mindset,
clearly visible amongst most of today’s medical professionals and health care
bureaucrats, that it is the germ (formally designated SARS-CoV-2) that has to
be tracked down, isolated, avoided, and eradicated—and that’s all that matters.
The “terrain”, to conventional modern thinkers, is nothing.
For instance, on the Ontario government’s website telling its citizens
what to do about COVID-19, its advice consists entirely of measures designed to
prevent people from coming in contact with the virus: stay home, wash your
hands often, don’t touch your face, maintain physical distancing and wear a
mask when you have to go out.
No mention is made of any measures individuals can take to ensure their
immune systems are operating at peak efficiency (or as the French scientists
would have put it, their terrain is well prepared to mount a defence). It’s
almost as though the Ontario government doesn’t believe human beings have
immune systems or that they’re of any use whatsoever. The only hope, Ontario
seems to believe, is for a pharmaceutical company to patent a vaccine, because
that is the only way that human beings can defend themselves against a virus,
or acquire immunity.
In fact,
Ontario and Canada have gone out of their way to discourage people from looking
for methods of helping themselves. Ontario’s website says “there is no specific
treatment” for COVID-19. End of story. Canada’s government-owned broadcasting
company, the CBC, recently published this article denouncing “bogus cures”
including vitamin C, zinc, medicinal mushrooms and oil of oregano.
This official attitude is
utter nonsense—there is actually an abundance of scientific evidence supporting
various nutritional supplements as being instrumental in preparing people’s
immune systems to repel or overcome viral infections.
Take zinc, for example. Many
COVID-19 patients have mentioned as symptoms the loss of their senses of smell
and taste. According to the BBC, these symptoms affects
as many as 18 percent of infected patients. This CNN article says that some people
will take days or weeks to recover these senses after having the virus,
while others may take months or years.
But the loss of these senses
is a well-established symptom of zinc deficiency, a fact not mentioned in
either of the two articles cited, and apparently not known to most of the
mainstream medical community. Yet here
is a PubMed study connecting zinc deficiencies with “smell and
taste disturbances”. Here’s one specifically connecting “older
patients” with zinc deficiencies and loss of acuity in the senses of taste and
smell. Both of these studies also mention that zinc deficiencies lead to
impaired immune function or an increased risk of infection. Can medical
“experts” and governments not connect the dots?
Vitamin D is another nutrient
(a hormone, actually) well recognized by scientists to have antiviral benefits.
Google Scholar lists 3,670 research reports published in 2020 alone containing
the words “vitamin D” and “virus”.
But rather than recommending
adequate amounts of vitamin D to Canadians, Health Canada has for many years
discouraged people from supplementing with it. “Most Canadians are getting
enough vitamin D” says this government website, recommending only
that people over 50 might want to take the paltry amount of 400 international
units (IU) daily. Other Canadian governments pages recommend slightly more—this one, for instance, which says adults over
70 should take up to 800 IU daily. Never do their recommendations come even
close to those of the Vitamin D Society, a consortium of scientists who study
this subject. Their FAQ brochure recommends at least 4,000 IU
daily to maintain a healthy serum vitamin D level.
But it gets worse. Vitamin D
is actually free, if people would only go outdoors in the summer and expose
their skin appropriately to the sun. These days, there are even cell phone apps
that tell you when the sun is in the right position for your location, how long
you should stay out, and how much of your body needs to be exposed in order to
get the right dosage. The apps can also be used to determine how to prevent a
burn.
Instead of telling Canadians how to get
this free vitamin, Health Canada has told them for years to
do exactly the opposite: to slather on sunscreen every time they go outdoors in
summer and never to expose their skin to the sun.
How many Canadians have died, and will continue to die, of unnecessary
health ailments (including COVID-19) because their government has given them
this extraordinarily bad advice?
Americans are no better off. The
National Institutes of Health fact sheet on vitamin D recommends the
same 800 IU maximum that Canada recommends. And it says, “The American Academy
of Dermatology advises that photoprotective measures be taken, including the
use of sunscreen, whenever one is exposed to the sun.”
That’s no surprise, really.
The US government is bedded down even more cozily than the Canadian government
with the pharmaceutical companies who will eventually be licenced to produce
the sacred vaccine.
But while Pasteur’s germ-theory mindset reigns in officialdom, savvy
consumers seem to be following Béchamp and Bernard, without ever having heard
of them. Vitamin C, zinc lozenges, and more exotic supplements such as
monolaurin (a derivative of coconut oil which in laboratory tests destroys the
viral envelope in a manner similar to soap) have been flying off store shelves.
Online sellers can’t keep them in stock as word spreads among the public that
there’s more they can do than merely trust their governments.
Epidemiologists busily debate the pros and cons of lockdowns and masks
in controlling the spread of the virus, but I have yet to see a single report
of anyone who has thought to compare the serum vitamin D levels of those who
succumbed, versus those who recovered, versus those who have never become
infected. This is the sort of data they should be looking at, but imbued with
the germ-theory mindset, they are allowing this valuable information to slip
away.
I hope this article will change that.
Karen Selick [send her mail] obtained her LL.B. (Bachelor of
Laws) degree at the University of Toronto in 1976. She retired from practicing
law in 2015 and then spent two years studying holistic nutrition at the Edison
Institute of Nutrition. She has been a freelance writer for over 30 years. Her
work has appeared in The Freeman, Fraser Forum, the National Post, The Globe
and Mail, Canadian Lawyer magazine, and elsewhere.
Copyright © Karen Selick
Copyright © Karen Selick
