Connecting the Dots to Our Brave New World
Humankind
is at a cusp, a point of transition between two different states of governance
and existence. The world today is like a sack being slowly filled while the
string around the opening is pulled increasingly tighter to prevent the
contents from escaping confinement. The shadows of this future are everywhere
to be seen but even the keenest of observers tend to view the portents not as
the warnings they are, but instead regard all these pieces of one despairing
puzzle as disconnected and unrelated events. In this essay, we will take a look
at where our world is going, how it is going there, and why it is going there.
For, dark and despairing, my sight I may seal, but man cannot hide
what God would reveal.
‘Tis the sunset of life gives me mystical lore,and coming events cast their shadow before.[1]
‘Tis the sunset of life gives me mystical lore,and coming events cast their shadow before.[1]
One needn’t be credentialed as either prophet or oracle to make
the connections and expose the plan. It is another matter entirely to convince
average readers of the truth of it. German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer
wrote that all truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
We are midway between the first and second stages, where proponents of exposure
are still widely ridiculed but, if they gain a popular audience, they will be
violently attacked.
Where
we are going – One World Government
Lest we succumb to the temptation of dismissing this as yet
another batty conspiracy theory, it would be wise to consider these quotes:
David Rockefeller in an address to the Trilateral Commission,
referring to the Bilderberg Group, whose existence was hotly denied and derided
for decades as just another conspiracy theory:
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time
magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our
meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It
would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had
been subject to the bright lights of public scrutiny during those years. But,
the world is now more sophisticated and fully prepared to march towards our one
world-government. The supranational sovereignty of our intellectual elites and
world bankers is surely preferable to the globe as a whole.”[2]
Montagu
Norman, Governor of The Bank of England prior to the crash of 1929,
addressing the United States Bankers’ Association, New York, Idaho Leader, 26
August 1924.
“When, through process of law, the common people lose their homes,
they will become more docile and more easily governed through the strong arm of
the government applied by a central power of wealth under leading financiers.
These truths are well known among our principal men, who are now engaged in
forming an imperialism to govern the world.”[3]
Banker
Paul Warburg, testifying before the US Senate on February
17, 1950, stated,
“We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The
only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or
consent.”[4]
We will have a look at one
example each of the ‘conquest’ and ‘consent’ scenarios in Iraq and Greece, but
let me state here that there are literally thousands of similar statements
going back well over 100 years (sufficient with footnotes to fill a 300-page
book), by authors and personalities famous and obscure, but all containing
essentially the same message – that the financial powers of Europe and America
are planning a super-sovereign world government within their absolute control.
One would have to be a fool to ignore the sheer volume of evidence.
A
Quick Look at Greece
Greece is now a failed state, an almost perfect exemplar of our
future, the definitive ideal of those planning the world to come. Driven into
bankruptcy by unrepayable loans, the leaders of Greece threw away their
nation’s one chance for survival as a sovereign state and instead capitulated
totally, accepting draconian measures meant to perpetually impoverish their
population, while privatising the entire nation in one fell swoop. The
international bankers bullied Greece into placing the nation’s entire infrastructure
into a so-called trust (controlled by “an independent Luxembourg-based
company”), which, by order, would be “entirely outside the reach or influence”
of the Greek government. The bankers and their friends will now take ownership
of all of it, at prices they set.
Greece was bullied into a package of reforms with severe austerity
measures and spending cuts. The government slashed spending in all quarters,
eliminated 25% of civil service positions, reducing wages by 30% for those
remaining. Greece was forced to increase the VAT rate, reduce (and eliminate)
pensions and increase the retirement age, raise the domestic corporation tax
while cutting taxes for the top 1% and foreign corporations, take drastic
measures to “improve tax collection and fight tax evasion”. Naturally, the
economy instantly cratered, losing about one quarter of its size with
unemployment rising above 25% and youth unemployment above 50%, rendering the
majority of families under considerable financial stress.
The government was also forced to establish virtually a new
constitution, with Eurocrats and IMF officials not only writing the new laws
but also having a veto over all new legislation, serving to embody in law a
lack of social infrastructure and perpetual poverty, emasculating the
sovereignty of the state. To ensure compliance with the austerity directives,
Greece is obliged to surrender control over the policing of all major portions
of its economy. Eurocrats and IMF officials not only wrote the new laws, but EU
(i.e. banking) officials are placed inside all ministries, with authority to
ensure compliance and control funds. Greeks now hate the Europeans bitterly,
believing that these foreign creditors’ power to “rummage through every
government department on Greek soil” is an insult to Greek sovereignty, with
Greece in fact and reality now facing not only austerity but external
governance.
Greece’s Finance Minister, Yanis Varoufakis,
resigned his position rather than participate in the destruction of his
country, accusing the bankers and the ECB of deploying “liquidity asphyxiation”
to bring the country to its knees, saying
“The costs being demanded of Greece are so punitive that they are
almost impossible to meet.” He said further that “The most humiliating and
unbearable choice is an agreement that will surrender and loot our country and
subjugate our people. The European Central Bank cut off all liquidity and
creditors simply destroyed our country.”
Greece’s economy has become nearly paralysed, with the whole
economy shifting to cash. The local payments system is breaking down since
nobody wants to accept transfers into bank accounts that could be seized at any
moment, the Greeks remembering only too well the recent prior events in Cyprus
where the same bankers seized from 50% to 90% of all bank accounts of
significant size, including pension funds and (to the glee of many) all
accounts held by Russians. Many Cypriots saw their savings wiped out because of
the privately-owned central bank. The US government did something similar to
its own citizens in 1933 by seizing all gold holdings by Americans – in the
depths of the Great Depression. Citizens received dollars in return for the
seized gold, but that dollar was formally devalued by 40% at the same time,
robbing all of 60% of their holdings.[5][6]
Greece has virtually ceased to exist as a sovereign nation, and
there are many others similar, including Cyprus, Haiti, Somalia, Iraq, Libya,
the Balkans, Panama, Nicaragua. This is not news. To quote William Blum:
“It was under Reagan administration influence that the
International Monetary Fund and World Bank began widely imposing the policy
package known as structural adjustment – featuring deregulation, privatization,
emphasis on exports, cuts in social spending – that has plunged country after
country in the developing world into economic destitution.”
The IMF chief at the time was honest about what was to come,
saying in 1981 that, for low-income countries, “adjustment is particularly
costly in human terms”.[7][8]
With Greece as in all such cases after Imperialism has taken
control, the nation is surrounded by a news blanket through which little if
anything escapes, with the willing compliance (or terrified submission) of all
news wires and media outlets, removing the country from the worldwide public
mind.
A
Look at Iraq
It is well-known the US launched a devastating war on Iraq,
criminally unjustified and based entirely on falsehoods, and against the advice
of its own military, some in the Pentagon labeling the idea “crazy”. By 2013
the US media were reporting a US military withdrawal from Iraq, but the US
never had any intention of ever leaving Iraq. The myth of withdrawal was merely
a PR attempt “to delete Iraq from the public’s collective consciousness, to
make it disappear so they can work quietly without public scrutiny”. It is true
that several hundred small military bases have been closed, but there are an
additional 40 or 50 very large bases that were built to be permanent and will
never be closed.
The US embassy in Beijing contains an astonishing more than 1,200
people, but the US embassy in Baghdad contains more than 16,000 people, the
largest and most expensive in the world, comprising more than 100 acres, larger
than the Vatican City, and costing more than 2 billion dollars to build. It is
a self-contained, heavily armed and fortified city in the center of Baghdad, centered
on Saddam’s former palace and containing more than 20 buildings surrounded by
20-foot walls and entirely self-sufficient for electricity, water, and all
other functions, the permanent Middle East Headquarters of the American empire.
From here, in conjunction with the US “embassy” in Yerevan, Armenia that
contains 6,000 people (the second-largest embassy in the world) the US can
spread its brutal imperial tentacles over a wide swath of Mesopotamia and the
Middle East.
Iraq’s
New Legislative Control
Iraq’s government is a nearly irrelevant puppet administration.
The first acts of the occupying Provisional Authority were to rewrite Iraq’s
constitution and body of laws by declaring a succession of 100 so-called
“Provisionary Orders” promulgated by American Paul Bremer.
These Provisionary Orders were written into Iraqi law prior to the US handover
of the government, and have the highest standing of all laws in Iraq, so high
they “cannot be removed by any subsequent Iraqi government”. They are perpetual.[9]
Orders 57 and 77 ensure full control of Iraq by placing
US-appointed auditors and inspectors-general in every government ministry, with
sweeping authority over contracts, programs, employees and regulations. These
Orders stipulate that the US must approve every senior government appointment
and every candidate for elected office. US military officers are reported to
frequently and freely enter cabinet meetings with demands or instructions on
policy decisions to be made. One of Bremer’s first acts was to close almost 200
state-owned businesses and turn the industry sectors over to American
companies, rendering unemployed more than 500,000 people. He took control of
Iraq’s media, shuttering them on a whim, over the objections of virtually
everyone.
Bremer’s Orders permit foreign multinationals to privatise the
entire nation including all physical and social infrastructure and all
commerce. They allocate to foreign oil companies the exclusive right to at
least 65% of the country’s oil reserves, and to determine the distribution of
revenue and profit allocated to Iraq from the remainder. Order 39 allows for
the tax-free remittance of all foreign corporate profits. Order 81 stipulates
that all Iraqi farmers must use Monsanto’s GM seed for all crops planted in the
country, with the use of any heritage Iraqi seed stock now totally prohibited.
Order 17 guarantees that all Americans and foreign contractors in Iraq will not
be subject to Iraqi law. The orders state that “All trained elements of the
Iraqi armed forces shall at all times be under the operational control of the
American commander”. Order 56 creates a new privately-owned (foreign) central
bank.
Examining
Bremer’s Laws
I have occasionally been charged with responsibility for drafting
legislation at a national level and can testify this is not something one does
in ten minutes over a cup of coffee. The task requires extreme expertise in a
particular area and a more than adequate facility in the drafting of legal
wording. When amending legislation, it is paramount to possess a flawless
familiarity with the content of existing law and, most importantly, a thorough
apprehension of the full range of potential consequences of a particular
selection of legal wording.
Consider the framing of legislation for a national health care
system. Certainly we need one or more medical experts intimately familiar with
the entire range of health services and a general appreciation of the required
infrastructure, but we also need extensive experience in planning the delivery
system for such care, as well as the taxation implications of financing. It
would be rare to find this combination of knowledge in one person, to say
nothing of the legal knowledge necessary to draft the appropriate huge
legislation. If we add medical insurance into this mix, it should be apparent
that we need an entire team of specialists and considerable time to forge the
necessary legal framework. Moreover, except for the most simple of items, we
would almost never rely on the opinion or judgment of only one person in any
field, thus considerably expanding the numbers of this team.
Bremer’s laws covered virtually the entire gamut of Iraqi society,
including taxation, transportation, and medical care, the founding of a
privately-owned central bank, a new Iraqi currency and a full slate of laws on
foreign investment, banking and securities markets, SOEs, a new electoral law
governing parties and elections. There were new laws governing the nation’s
petroleum industry, control of the media, laws dealing with foreign
contractors, the auditing of government departments, a new penal code,
detention and prison facilities, control of Iraqi borders, ports and airports,
a Ministry of Science and Technology, a full revision of the labor code, vast
legislation dealing with trademarks, patents, design, and an overhaul of IP,
entirely new laws controlling agriculture that included GM seed, and very much
more.
It should be obvious that no one man could possess the required
expertise in all these areas, and nothing in Bremer’s background suggests
ability of consequence in any of them. Further, many of these portions of
legislation were extremely complex, each containing a great many pages of precise
legal wording that would have required several months in the drafting. This
means a great number of large teams meeting regularly over many months to
finalise drafts, but it also infers mandatory reporting to a control group on
the progress, guidance as to overall intent of each piece of legislation, with
periodic approval of direction, content, and final result. Yet Bremer was
promulgating these new Orders at the rate of three or four per week, the entire
100 produced in about ten months.
The drafting of these laws would have required at least hundreds
of experts, perhaps more than 1,000, and a lengthy time in preparation. Bremer
was appointed to Iraq on May 9, 2003, and issued his first Order (on the
De-Ba’athification of Iraqi Society) on May 16. That would hardly provide
adequate time to overcome jet lag, much less to obtain an appreciation of what
Ba’ath society was, much less the rationale for, and consequences of,
exterminating it. Bremer then issued another 30 or 40 laws within the next few
months, including the entire penal code, banking and investment, the military,
and more.
Order 56 creating the new privately-owned central bank is an
immense document that would require months of preparation. The seed laws were
almost certainly written by the lawyers from Monsanto and Cargill, et al.
Others are similar. It is obvious these laws were written in advance by
executives and lawyers of banks and multinational corporations all over the
world and simply delivered to Bremer to promulgate. It is also obvious these
laws were planned and in process long before the US invaded Iraq. To add to
this equation, we have the fact that the laws were not prepared by any portion
of the US government, since even the White House had no specific knowledge of any
of Bremer’s activities and the US Congress had been sidelined and silenced
beforehand.
Bremer’s
Appointment
Let’s step back for a moment to examine Bremer’s appointment as
Director of the Coalition Provisional Authority and interim President of Iraq.
The sanitised narrative tells us that Bremer was selected by President Bush,
but there is no evidence that Bush had ever met Bremer or indeed ever heard his
name, the man having had minor past appointments but having been out of
government employ for more than ten years prior.
Secretary
of State Colin Powell had already placed Lt.
Gen. Jay Garner as the top official in Iraq, and planned to add Zalmay
Khalilzad, an Iraqi with extensive local knowledge to assist Garner. Suddenly
and without explanation (while Powell was out of town), Bremer was plucked from
thin air and appointed to replace Garner – to the great surprise of Powell,
Rice, and all others. According to the published record, Powell called Rice on
his return and asked, “What’s going on? What happened?” Rice apparently
replied, “I don’t know. I had nothing to do with it.” Bremer’s appointment was
not only a surprise, but against the stated will of the President, the
Secretary of State and the country’s National Security Advisor. As well, both
the CIA and the military strongly objected, the CIA because they hadn’t been
asked or informed and the military because they viewed an uninformed civilian
helicopter transplant as both dangerous and useless.
The facts suggest the impetus came through Henry Kissinger, with
whom Bremer had been closely associated and was a Managing Director of
Kissinger Associates for 10 or 12 years to that point, the thread seeming to
lead through Cheney while bypassing the President. The facts are not clear on
whether Bush was instructed to obey or was even informed on the matter prior to
his announcement. Military knowledge and intimate familiarity with Iraq were
deemed essential for this position, but Bremer had neither. When Bremer was
given the position in Iraq, the White House plan was that he take Khalilzad
with him but, in a private meeting with President Bush, Bremer insisted he be
solely in charge, a demand Bush accommodated.
On the organisation chart, Bremer reported to Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld, but ample evidence exists that Rumsfeld totally ignored Bremer
and his activity, Bremer doing the same in reverse. Rumsfeld had a reputation
as a control mandarin; it has been widely documented that he was often present
in Baghdad to direct the torture facilities and ‘military pacification’ of the
Iraqi citizenry, and it is thus beyond logic that he would have ignored his
most important subordinate – the “President of Iraq”, who was tasked with
remaking the entire country, but there is no credible record of the two even
crossing paths. Bremer held what appears to have been a fully independent and
unassailable position with no oversight from any part of the US government.
Rajiv Chandrasekaran, an assistant managing editor of The
Washington Post and its bureau chief in Baghdad at the time, wrote a book
titled ‘Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq’s Green Zone’.[9] He spoke at length about this in a PBS
interview in 2006. [10] Chandrasekaran
claims Bremer “viewed his (Saddam’s) palace out there in Baghdad not as an
embassy that had any obligation to report back developments to Washington”,
claiming further that virtually no information flowed from Baghdad to
Washington and that “Bremer had been given an exemption” from clearing any
decisions through the White House.
In fact, Bremer’s leash was so long and Bremer so secretive that
when the White House wanted information, Condolezza Rice could do no better
than have her NSC staff check the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) website
– to see if they could learn what was happening in Baghdad. Bremer further
refused to hire anyone who wasn’t ‘ideologically sympathetic’ to his real
purposes, or who might have a ‘back channel’ to Washington. “Their only
allegiance would be to Bremer.” Chandrasekaran says that whatever Bremer
wanted, he got, and that he “amassed quite a degree of power and influence”. In
this entire matter, the US Congress was nowhere to be seen, totally removed
from oversight or governing.
A
Matter of Money
At least US$100 billion and perhaps as much as US$200 billion, the
bulk of this in cash, all of it within Bremer’s control, simply disappeared
without a trace. The US FED alone shipped US$40 billion in cash by air to Iraq,
most of it unaccounted for. Millions of tons of Iraqi oil were sold without
accounting as to the purchasers and with no record of the disposition of the
receipts. A large but undetermined additional amount of exported oil was
unmetered, leaving no record of the volume or the payments. Bremer had a room
near his office in Saddam’s palace that contained by documented reports US$600
million to US$800 million in cash, that was his private ‘slush fund’ and which
bore no records of any kind. There was no oversight from any source. Billions
of dollars were repeatedly paid for contracts where no evidence existed of work
having being done. In addition, Iraq’s central bank was looted of at least
US$20 billion in gold (some reports claimed US$60 billion), plus undocumented
billions in foreign currency, which is also unaccounted for.
In one case, a ‘reconstruction project’ was quoted to the Iraqi
‘government’ as costing US$20 billion but Bremer presented instead an invoice
for US$60 billion. When Iraq objected, Bremer’s response was, “Just be grateful
we saved you from Saddam.” The $60 billion was paid from Iraqi oil exports but
no documentation exists as to who received the money and no evidence existed as
to any actual work having been performed. In other cases, Bremer paid multiple
invoices for hundreds of millions of dollars each as wages for thousands of
workers when no one could produce evidence that such workers had ever existed.[11]
An International Advisory and Monitoring Board (IAMB) was later
established to provide independent financial oversight of Bremer’s CPA
spending, the board including representatives from the UN, the World Bank, the
IMF and the Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development. The IAMB spent
months trying to find auditors acceptable to the US, the Bahrain office of KPMG
finally appointed in April 2004. It was stonewalled. They wrote in an interim
report:
“KPMG has encountered resistance from CPA staff regarding the
submission of information required to complete our procedures.”
“The auditors even had trouble getting passes to enter the Green
Zone. There appears to have been good reason for the Americans to stall. At the
end of June 2004, the CPA would be disbanded and Bremer would leave Iraq. There
was no way the (White House) would want independent auditors to publish a
report into the financial propriety of its Iraqi administration while the CPA
was still in existence and Bremer at its head still answerable to the press. So
the report was published in July.”[12]
Bremer’s exit from Iraq raised many questions. His handover of
government was done days in advance of the published schedule, performed
entirely by surprise and literally in minutes, Bremer then quickly boarding a
helicopter for the airport where he then boarded a US military transport. When
all Iraqis had left the scene, he suddenly deplaned and boarded a private
Gulfstream 4 that flew him out. He then resurfaced in Vermont as a ski
instructor.
There is very much more. Generally, the auditors found either
inadequate or no documentation to account for almost all funds, with no way of
knowing how much money was actually looted or to whom it was paid. “Since then,
investigators have spent years trying to trace what happened to the enormous
amount of money shipped in the frantic days of the occupation of Iraq. Although
there have been hundreds of pages of reports, Congressional hearings, and
inquiries from Washington to Baghdad, no one in Congress, a special inspector
general’s office, the Department of Defense or the Iraqi government itself can
say with certainty what exactly happened to all of that money.”[12]
A
Review
Let’s review what we have so far. A group of powerful men decided
that Iraq would be colonised, and pressed Bush to use the US military to
destroy and then occupy the country, this over the objection of the US
military. This same group removed Garner and installed Bremer as the head of
the Coalition Occupying government, over the unanimous objections of the US
President, the Secretary of State, the National Security Council, the US
military and the CIA. Bremer, appearing to have unlimited power and no oversight,
reported to no one in the US government, the evidence suggesting the White
House and Cabinet, including Donald Rumsfeld, Bremer’s direct superior, and the
US President, were forbidden to meddle or even to ask direct questions on his
activity. The US military and CIA voiced strong objections – to no avail – to
many of Bremer’s initial laws, especially on the Ba’ath society and dismantling
the Iraqi military, stating these actions would lead to perpetual protests and
bloodshed.
This same group of powerful men gathered hundreds of experts to
draft new legislation to control Iraq according to their private plan.
Simultaneously, Iraq was being unconscionably looted, openly and without
apparent inhibition, perhaps of US $200 billion in total which disappeared
without a trace, and with no information as to who received that money.
This was all done with no identifiable benefit to the US as a
nation, or to the American people. The US incurred the several trillion dollars
of the cost of the Iraq war, took all the battlefield casualties, and was
delegated to occupy Iraq at its own expense, then remain silent. The only
apparent duty of the US Congress was to conduct an insincere investigation into
the missing billions, then sweep the matter under the carpet. The media,
compliant as always, remained silent on all matters demanding a voice.
Who
are They?
Who were those people, this handful of powerful men, who decided
to subjugate and loot Iraq, the men responsible for drafting all Iraq’s new
laws, and undoubtedly the recipients of the missing billions? Who are these men
who have the power to direct the US President and the military to destroy an
innocent country and occupy it? Who has the power to take over Iraq’s entire
infrastructure and loot all its assets, while forbidding any part of the US
government to interfere, in spite of the fact that the US paid the bill for the
entire effort? Similarly, who were the men with the power not only to terrify
Greece into utter submission and loot the country’s entire infrastructure in
one shot but to embed themselves permanently into Greece’s government with the
authority to maintain and ensure that submission?
These men were, are, and will be, our new masters in our Brave New
World. But there is much more. We have seen brief examples of where we are
going – “by conquest or consent”. Let’s take a brief look at how the rest of us
are going there.
The
Train to Perdition
The over-riding feature of our new world will be the ultimate
control of our economies, our nations – such as they will be, and our lives, by
a group of international bankers and industrialists. One arrow in this quiver
is the privatisation – taking public assets into private hands – of the entire
physical and social infrastructure of our nations, as we have seen with Greece
and Iraq – and which already applies to more than a few other nations. It is
this that is responsible for the extreme push that has been building since the
1970s and early 1980s to privatisation, the US being the best example of
acquiescence. For those nations resisting, this is the cause of the push in the
WTO and other agreements to securitise all infrastructure in preparation for
collapsing stock markets then purchasing for pennies all of a nation’s assets.
Privatisation includes even arable land and water aquifers, everything of value
and of necessity for human life.
The world needs with extreme urgency to see a world map of
privatisation as it exists today, diagrams of all nations displaying all the
national assets and infrastructure that have already been privatised. The shock
from seeing this alone might serve to wake up the world, to realise how far
this strategy has already progressed. As one example, after the destruction of
Jugoslavia, it was briefly reported that George Soros and Madeline Albright had
taken possession of Kosovo’s entire communications network, with an estimated
value of US$800 million. George Bush’s family took ownership of millions of
acres of the largest water aquifer in South America. There are literally
thousands of such events scattered around the globe that have received no
publicity or attention, being considered as isolated instances instead of
crucial elements of a vast plan that has been increasing in speed for the past
60 years. Extreme attention is being paid to controlling the entire world’s
fresh water. Nestle’s president is on record as stating that water is not a
human right but a commodity that should be priced and sold (and
privately-owned).
It isn’t only public assets that are being ‘privatised’. This
includes the creation of ever-larger worldwide corporate and banking behemoths swallowing
their smaller rivals until, in each nation, most of the means of production and
distribution are in the same hands, eliminating nation by nation the leading
producers until none of significance remain. Control of a nation’s food supply
is part of this enormously ambitious scheme of world government and control,
hence the intense bullying push on all nations to accept GM seed. This seed has
two main purposes. The obvious one is that it gives the multi-national seed
companies virtual total control over the fundamental fabric of a nation’s food
supply. The less obvious purpose is that GM seed was invented not by seed
companies but by the US military as an offensive weapon or, more precisely, as
a weapons-delivery system. It is now widely-known that many lethal pathogens
can be spliced into GM seed. The masters will have a choice with recalcitrant
nations: either refuse a supply of seed and let the population starve, or
splice typhus, HIV, the plague, into the seeds and let nature take its course.
The plan involves the destruction of national sovereignty and of
individual nationalism. Patriotism and loyalty to nations are a curse which
must be eliminated. There are many avenues for this. One is the incessant
drumbeat in the media, propagandising the world against economic or any other
kind of nationalism. Another is immigration, as is being carried out in Europe.
Economic hopefuls and other refugees have no nationalistic feelings toward
their adopted country and no regrets over lost sovereignty. When a nation
reaches a level of 30% of such persons, it may be impossible to arouse a
critical mass of indignity that would lead to protests and uprisings.
But sovereignty does not disappear; it is merely replaced. Thus,
another major building block is the transfer of sovereignty to the bankers and
their multi-national corporations, which was the main thrust of the stillborn
TPP where the rights of corporations would supersede those of a nation’s
government and its supreme courts, being thrust solely into the hands of panels
consisting of lawyers selected by this same group. The TPP attempt was
astonishing in its boldness, a terrifying amount of bullying of nations to
transfer absolute power to a group of entirely unknown persons for the sake of
establishing in perpetuity the rights of these people to absolutely loot every
nation to abject poverty. As one example, the refusal to a tobacco company to
sell cigarettes would trigger an automatic obligation to pay that firm all the
profits – in perpetuity – it would have made had it been entirely free of
government regulation.
To bring this plan to completion also requires the eventual
destabilisation and effective destruction of the family, of organised society,
and of religion. When the Bolsheviks inflicted their communist coups throughout
Europe, the instance of Hungary is most exemplary. When the communists took
over Hungary, Bela Kun proclaimed himself dictator, one of his first decrees
being to nationalise almost all private property and to announce that private
commerce would be punished with the death penalty. He immediately confiscated
virtually all industry and land, and began an intense attack on religion while
making great efforts to undermine and destroy all public morality as well as
concepts of God and religion. He instituted a program of what came to be known
as cultural terrorism. As part of this, he began a radical sex education
program in Hungarian schools where children were instructed in free love,
sexual intercourse, the archaic nature of middle class family codes, the
outdatedness of monogamy and the irrelevance of religion which deprives man of
all pleasures. Women were called to rebel against the sexual mores of the time
by engaging in open promiscuity.
The stated purpose in promoting licentiousness among women and
children was to destroy the family, the core institution of Christianity and
western culture. As perhaps the best current example, we can clearly see
evidence in slow motion today of this happening in the US, in large part with
the heavy promotion and even celebration of the alphabet soup of sexual
preferences and of two men becoming ‘husband’ and ‘wife’ and adopting small
boys.
In terms of society, this is the cause of the class war being
waged in all Western nations today, the purpose being, as with the Bolshevik
revolutions and the US in 2008, to either kill off or bankrupt the bourgeois,
the middle classes, and send them all down to the lower class where they
eventually become homeless, disposable cattle.
The 2008 debacle in the US was generally described as a financial
crisis, but it was really part of the class war, meant to deprive as many
Americans as possible of their homes to make them more docile and more easily
governed. The huge bubble in 2008 in ‘subprime’ home loans was immediately
repeated with automobiles in precisely the same way, these loans securitised
then diced and sliced while being given AAA ratings by Moodys. Today, the ratio
of delinquent auto loans is approaching a crisis point and will undoubtedly
soon implode, depriving millions of Americans of their only hope of holding any
employment since a car is virtually a necessity in much of the US. In 2008,
most of the US middle class was unceremoniously dumped into the lower class,
all signs seeming to indicate a repeat on the horizon.
The program has also involved for the past 60 years increasingly
bold attempts at population reduction, either killing off or sterilising vast
swaths of humanity. This was the reason for the foundation of Planned
Parenthood, the main reason for existence of USAID, for Kissinger’s NSSM 200 –
a viciously aggressive plan to prevent, at apparently almost any cost, births
in non-Western countries. USAID and Reimert Ravenholt sterilised at least 100
million unwitting women, killing tens of millions in the process. This program
was behind Robert McNamara’s Project 100,000. It was almost certainly behind
the recent Zika virus in South America. It is the reason the WHO has been
traveling the undeveloped world and sterilising countless millions of women without
their knowledge through the fraudulent tetanus vaccination programs where the
vaccine is laced with Hcg, in fact permanently vaccinating women against
pregnancy.
This is the reason seed companies are suddenly promoting the use
of cotton seeds as a primary foodstuff for underdeveloped countries. Cotton
seeds are toxic, containing a chemical called gossypol which is an effective
male sterilant. The seed companies claim to have removed this toxin to a safe
level, but there is no safe level for gossypol. Even very minute doses taken
repeatedly (as when used for a basic food) will render an entire male
population sterile. What the WHO, the World Bank, and UNICEF do for the female
populations, the seed companies will do for the male portion. If they have their
way, much of the world may one day be uninhabited.
The Bankers’ Private Army
Such grand plans to corral
humanity as domestic animals and to successfully put down opposition from them
and the remnants of their governments, requires overwhelming military strength.
It began with the British East India Company where Rothschild had at one time a
standing army of more than one million men, a testimony to the profitability of
looting rich India. The army had two main purposes: to discourage local Indians
from protesting at the looting of their nation by foreigners, and the necessity
of enforcing by violence the abandonment by farmers of food crops to grow opium
for sale in China. The history books are mostly silent and cleverly vague on
the transfer of these responsibilities to the British government, leading
readers to assume the British at some point ordered the East India Company to
relinquish its power to be replaced by the more humane British. But that’s now
how it was. Rothschild abandoned his military when the profits were
insufficient to carry it, and simply transferred his flag to the British
military who became literally the Banker’s Private Army to be used not only in
India but in many other instances like the Boer wars where Rothschild wanted
the gold and diamonds, this private army obediently killing all those who stood
in the way.
The UK was used thus for
many years, through two world wars nobody wanted, until England was finally
bankrupt, its fabled Empire in tatters, and begging the US for financial
support. England was deliberately sacrificed for these ends as described, and today
remains only a rump, a tail so grateful to have a dog. But no matter. These
same men had already obtained virtual full control of the US government and
simply transferred their flag – again to the world’s most powerful military. It
is no secret that the US is itself being cannibalised by this same group,
eventually drowning in unrepayable war debt, the citizenry mostly homeless and
bankrupt, and the entire infrastructure and means of production owned by this
same small group. As Benjamin Netanyahu famously stated, “Once we have squeezed
everything we want from the US, it can dry up and blow away.” And it will.
But no matter. The flag is
already being transferred to NATO, a supra-national military responsible only
to this same group, an irresistible military force comprised of all the armed
forces of dozens of nations. This is why a full surrender of a nation’s
military is a prerequisite even for consideration in joining the EU. This is
why the servicemen of NATO are being taught to abandon all feelings of
nationalism for their country and wear only a NATO flag on their hearts. NATO
was meant as the enforcement arm of the TPP, had it succeeded, but will still
function as something similar.
We are now seeing rampant
uprisings in Iraq, throughout South America, and will soon see them in Greece,
the populations arising en masse to protest against their impoverishment and
slavery. In the end, each stripped and emasculated national ‘government’ will
have only two functions: tax collection to funnel money to the masters of the
world, and population suppression to put down the inevitable revolts. In cases
where either the government itself revolts, or where the government proves
unable to quell massive disturbances, NATO will intervene to “pacify” the
population with terror and brutality.
Who
are These People?
The members of this group are generally extremely wealthy bankers
and industrialists, the owners or controllers of most of the world’s
multi-national companies, media, and so on, who seem to hold an ideal of a
world comprised of their small number owning all the means of production,
assisted by a larger group of educated compradors, all ruling over a world
populated by homeless, uneducated and impoverished pre-humans. I have no
explanation for this ambition. They would own or control the entire world’s
wealth, but to what end? None of these people can spend what they have now,
many private fortunes running into the trillions of dollars. I believe most of
us would prefer to be kings of a rich and educated society, rather than Tarzan,
king of the apes, the ruler of a herd of goats not being much of a ruler by any
measure.
Signs of Hope
There are some, but not
many. The strength of Russia and China, and perhaps Iran, is of some comfort,
since another world war is almost certainly on the horizon for the finalisation
of this plan. The protests in France and throughout South America bring some
comfort, particularly those nations gathering their courage and refusing to be
enslaved or to be bullied into submission by the US.
This cabal of would-be
world emperors has flaws of its own, prematurity resulting from excessive
confidence being one. It was the same group that attempted the fascist coup in
the US in 1934, but failed. The TPP was an astonishingly bold attempt to simply
bully much of the world into submission, which also failed. There have been
others.
The plethora of online
information and its absorption by what appears to be an increasing number of
people in many nations, is cause for hope since education is vital to expose
all parts of this plan, and sunlight is still the best disinfectant. And, as
William Blum said, you need faith and courage.
Larry
Romanoff is a retired management consultant and businessman. He has
held executive positions in international consulting firms, and owned an
international import-export business. He lives in Shanghai and is currently
writing a series of ten books generally related to China and the West. He can
be contacted at: 2186604556@qq.com He is a frequent
contributor to Global Research.
Notes
[1] Lochiel’s Warning; Thomas Campbell
[2] David Rockefeller Quotes;https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/9951.David_Rockefeller
[3] https://www.conservapedia.com/Farewell_Address ;
This was apparently a portion of a document called “The Bankers Manifesto” of
1892, that was re-stated by Norman and re-published in 1924.
[5] https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2013/03/25/can-a-cyprus-like-seizure-of-your-money-happen-here/#66d910682506
[6] https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/07/29/bank-of-cyprus-depositors-lose-savings/2595837/
[10] Imperial Life in The Emerald City:
Inside Iraq’s Green Zone;https://www.amazon.com/Imperial-Life-Emerald-City-Inside/dp/0307278832
[12] So, Mr Bremer, Where Did All the Money
Go? By Ed Harriman; The Guardian; July 7, 2005
https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/168-general/36058.html
https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/168-general/36058.html
[13] NY
Fed’s $40 Billion Iraqi Money Trail; Eamon Javers, 25 Oct 2011;https://www.cnbc.com/id/45031100
