It's clear that the inverted justices of the Supreme
Court are observably
among the "all asserts" that have reportedly been activated.
Within 35 minutes today
at 10 a.m. Eastern, what some thought was the most conservative Supreme Court
of all time concocted a fundamental right to transgenderism in the context of
labor law, erased the Second Amendment, and interfered with a state death
penalty case, but declined to interfere with a California law that criminalizes
law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration agents.
Taken in totality, the “conservative” legal movement, which has promoted the idea of “appointing better judges” rather than fighting the entire concept of judicial supremacism, has failed miserably. This was its Waterloo.
Here is a brief summary of four very important decisions and orders issued by the court today:
Taken in totality, the “conservative” legal movement, which has promoted the idea of “appointing better judges” rather than fighting the entire concept of judicial supremacism, has failed miserably. This was its Waterloo.
Here is a brief summary of four very important decisions and orders issued by the court today:
- The justices denied certiorari
to gun rights groups in 10 gun cases where states have denied citizens the
right to carry arms under any circumstance. Justice Thomas dissented in
the denial of cert in the New Jersey right to carry case and was joined by
Justice Kavanagh. It takes four justices to agree to hear a case, and it’s
not clear which of the others would also have agreed but didn’t sign on to
the dissent. Despite the plain meaning of the Constitution, 10 years after
Heller, and with circuit splits, the court refuses to act.
- In U.S. v. California et al.,
the Supreme Court denied the petition from the Department of Justice to
overturn a Ninth Circuit ruling upholding California’s sanctuary law.
California prohibits local law enforcement from cooperating with federal
immigration agents. Only Thomas and Alito would have granted the appeal.
- In what has become a growing
trend of SCOTUS interference with the few remaining capital punishment
cases, the justices remanded a Texas capital case because they believe the
accused did not have sufficient counsel. Alito dissented, joined by Thomas
and Gorsuch.
- In a 6-3 opinion written by
Justice Gorsuch, the court ruled that Title VII of the Civil Right act,
which passed in 1964 before anyone could fathom transgenderism, applies to
transgenderism and sexual orientation.
Taken together, these
decisions show the court believes there is an inalienable right to
transgenderism and illegal immigration but not to the Second Amendment. The
court believes it can tamper with every state criminal and capital conviction
on ever-evolving novel grounds, but it somehow believes a state can criminalize
foundational federal immigration powers.
It's just another failure
of conservativism. The good news is this is one more step towards the end of
Paper America and the false hope it offered to those inclined towards
cuckservatism and civnattery. Americans were never going to sue their way free
of emanations and penumbras.
