Einstein, Bell & Edison, Coca-Cola and the
Wright Brothers
There are only two nations in the world whose existence seems to be
founded primarily on historical myths. In the US, false historical mythology
permeates every nook and cranny of the American psyche, the result of more than
100 years of astonishing and unconscionable programming and propaganda, a
massive crime against an entire population. This condition pertains not only to
past events we think of as history, but to the extent that most items
permitting Americans to “feel good by being an American” are fabricated Disney
fairytales. This essay is a brief introduction to only a minor aspect of this
subject.
In the introduction to my
series of books (soon to be published) I wrote that “Perhaps 90%, or even 95%,
of everything we know, or think that we know, or that we believe to be true
about history, is wrong. To express this another way, if we were to take the
history of the entire world for the past 500 years and compress it into a book
of 100 pages, a full 50 of those pages would be blank. That is the extent to
which our true history has been suppressed, entirely deleted from the record
and from our consciousness. Of the remaining 50 pages, 45 are false in whole or
in part, photoshopped, sanitised, twisted, and with critical details omitted to
deliberately lead the public to the wrong conclusions.”[1]
Einstein, the Mythical Genius
One of the greatest mythical
frauds in history is that of Albert Einstein, the famous physicist who invented
the Theory of Relativity, E=mc² and so many other esoteric things. But this is
all fabrication. The claims about Einstein inventing any theory of relativity,
or light and photons, or time, are false. Almost every claim – almost
everything – attributed to Einstein is simply a lie. Einstein was an inept who
contributed nothing original to the field of quantum mechanics, nor any other
science. Far from being a competent physicist, he once even flatly denied that
the atom could be split and, much later, admitted that the idea of a chain
reaction in fissile material “had never occurred to me”.[2][3]
Einstein was a third-class
clerk at the government patent office in Bern, and never progressed beyond this
level even with years of experience. By all contemporary reports, Einstein
wasn’t even an accomplished mathematician. It has been well documented that
much of the mathematical content of Einstein’s so-called theories were well
beyond his ability. Walter Isaacson, president of the Aspen Institute, stated
that Einstein’s first wife Mileva Marić was a “Serbian physicist who had helped
him with (his) math . . .”[4] Other
prominent scientists have made the claim that his wife did most of his math for
him.
Henri Poincaré was the foremost
expert on relativity in the late 19th century and the first person to formally
present the theories, having published more than 30 books and over 500 papers
on the topics. Extensive documentation exists that Einstein and his associates
had studied Poincaré’s theories and mathematics for years, yet when Einstein
published his almost wholly-plagiarised versions he made no reference whatever
to these other works.
In the accepted historical
account, Einstein is credited with having written the correct field equations
for general relativity, an enormous falsehood. It is an undisputed fact that
David Hilbert sent Einstein a draft of his work (which had already been
submitted for publication), containing precisely these equations, evidenced by
the existence of a letter from Einstein to Hilbert thanking him for doing so.
Yet a few weeks later, Einstein delivered a public speech of Hilbert’s work, claiming
full credit for the derivation of Hilbert’s equations. Similarly, E=mc², the
famous equation relating mass, energy, and the speed of light, had been
published several times by Italian physicist Olinto De Pretto, long before
Einstein was suddenly given credit for it. In multiple thorough reviews of
scientific literature, prominent scientists have unanimously stated that there
is “absolutely nothing to connect Einstein to the derivation of this formula.”[5]
Einstein’s papers, theories,
mathematics, documentation, were almost 100% plagiarised from others. He
combined the prior published works of several people into one paper and claimed
ownership of all of it. His so-called theories were nothing more than a
composition encompassing the prior work of men like James Maxwell, Hendrik
Lorentz, Joseph Larmor, Olinto De Pretto, Robert Brown, Ludwig Boltzmann,
Friedrich Hasenöhrl, and many more.
In a paper he wrote in 1907, in
part responding to (already-virulent) accusations of plagiarism, Einstein
declared that plagiarism was perfectly acceptable as a form of ethical
research, stating “… the nature [of physics is] that what follows has already
been partly solved by other authors. I am [therefore] entitled to leave out a
thoroughly pedantic survey of the literature…”[6][7][8] In
other words, scientists all build on each others’ work, so Einstein could
freely compile the work of everyone before him and re-present it as his own,
with no obligation to even mention them or their work. His view of ethical
science was like building a tower where each person adds one stone and, if I
add the last stone, I not only take credit for the entire design and
construction of the tower, but I own the building.
Perhaps the most damning
evidence was when in 1953 Sir Edmund Whittaker published a very detailed
account of the origin and development of all these theories and equations of
physics, with extensive reference to the primary sources, documenting beyond
doubt that Einstein had no priority in any of it, and clearly stating so.
Einstein was alive and well when Whittaker published his book, yet he offered
no dispute to the conclusions, no refutation of Whittaker’s claim that he
(Einstein) had been irrelevant to the entire process. Einstein made no attempts
in his own defense but simply hid in the bushes and refused to make any public
comment whatever.[9]
Einstein was almost certainly
the greatest fraud and plagiarist in modern science, an unashamed intellectual
thief but, according to sources like Wikipedia, this is all just a minor “priority
dispute” about who said what first in the realm of relativity physics. These
sources misleadingly imply that several people made a discovery independently
and more or less simultaneously, and we are simply debating who went public
first. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Wikipedia is renowned as being
virtually useless as an information source due to widespread ideological bias
and censorship.
Einstein was Jewish and had the
support of the Jewish-controlled media who conspired to create yet another
historical myth. His fame and popularity today, his status as a hero of the
scientific world, are due only to decades of a well-planned force-feeding of
the Einstein myth to the masses by the media. The propaganda machine simply
airbrushed out of the history books all the physicists who formulated these
theories, and credited everything to Einstein. Without the extravagant
generations-long PR and propaganda campaign, Einstein would have remained in
the dustbin of obscurity where he belongs.
There are many Einstein
apologists who produce reams of heavily-documented irrelevancies masquerading
as proof, items such as a schoolmate who claimed “the flight of his
mathematical genius was so high that I could no longer follow.” Many scientists
and scientific historians know the truth of all this, and the accurate
historical record is readily available, but many appear afraid to speak out for
fear of damaging their careers. I have put the question to several prominent
physicists in different countries, eliciting similar responses, namely that “it
will not further one’s career to open a debate which will inevitably produce a
tsunami of invective and slander, to say nothing of accusations of
anti-Semitism.”
Time Magazine published more
than a dozen issues on Einstein, including a special Collector’s Edition, and
even ran an issue naming Einstein the “Person of the Century”. As with all
other American heroes, the PR machine has worked for decades to embellish the
myth with a collection of possibly hundreds of wise sayings attributed to this
man where there is absolutely no historical evidence he ever said any of those
things. The NYT published an article on a small cleverly-selected scientific
dispute, in which it claimed “Findings Back Einstein in a Plagiarism Dispute”.[10] And
thus is history spun by those who control the microphone. This is why so many
pages in our history book consist of misrepresentations and omitted facts, painting
a picture so considerably at odds with the truth. As with Thomas Edison,
Alexander Graham Bell, the Wright Brothers and so many others, the false
historical myths have been so deeply entwined in American and world history
that they cannot be unraveled.
Einstein, the “Man of Peace”
Similarly, there has been a
great campaign by Einstein’s revisionist apologists to disavow his strong
support for the development of the atomic bomb, claiming him to be “a man of
peace”. I have copies of correspondence from Einstein where he stated his
conviction that the United States should “demonstrate” the atomic bomb to
disfavored foreign countries. In one letter to then-US President Roosevelt, he
wrote, “… extremely powerful bombs of a new type may thus be constructed. A
single bomb of this type, carried by boat and exploded in a port, might very
well destroy the whole port together with some of the surrounding territory. I
am convinced as to the wisdom and the urgency of creating the conditions under
which that and related work can be carried out with greater speed and on a
larger scale than hitherto”.[11]
That statement is part of one
of Einstein’s letter to Roosevelt, suggesting he (Einstein) be “entrusted with
the task” of managing the project. Roosevelt refused Einstein’s fervent
requests to manage, or even to participate in, the project, because it was an
open secret that nobody trusted him and the FBI had conducted extensive
investigations against him. One FBI file labeled “Secret”, stated that Einstein
was affiliated with 33 organisations which had been cited by the
Attorney-General and/or Congress, as being politically suspect.
It is interesting that the
respected National Geographic is one of the world’s worst publications for
spinning historical fact and truth. In 2017, this magazine ran an article on
Einstein claiming that Hoover and the FBI despised Einstein and built a
1,400-page file on him because “the world-famous physicist was outspoken
against nuclear bombs”.[12][13]
The second portion of the same
letter is rather more disturbing, and has to my knowledge never been publicly
referenced anywhere. It clearly reveals that Einstein had had detailed
discussions with some wealthy acquaintances in Europe who were eager to
personally finance the US development of atomic bombs from their own pockets.
Einstein was informing the President he had access to these individuals with
whom he had already confirmed available funding, baiting Roosevelt with an
offer that, should he be ‘entrusted’ with management of the bomb project, he
could bring the necessary financing with him. He states that, as project
manager, one of his tasks would be: “providing funds … through his contacts
with private persons who are willing to make contributions for this cause.”[14]
It would be appropriate for us
to ask who were these “private persons” who had the money to finance the
development of the world’s first atomic bombs, and why they would want to
personally fund such a project. Einstein does not mention these individuals by
name, but they would surely have been Jewish and who in Europe (in the 1930s)
had the kind of money to offer open-ended funding for a scientific project the
cost of which was unknown and unknowable, but clearly massive.[15] This
offer was not spurred by patriotism but by the prospect of financial gain and
control of both the technology and the application of this ‘science’. We can
therefore further question who would have taken ownership of the technology,
and who would have been the intended victims of this large personal investment.
One plausible theory
I would add here that many of
Einstein’s propagandists and apologists have made repeated efforts to pass the
blame for the development of the atomic bomb onto Enrico Fermi, another
monstrous falsehood. The US government offered Fermi a cash payment of
US$100,000[16] to
lead the research and development of the atom bomb, but Fermi refused. I have
seen a copy of a letter from Fermi to the US President claiming that something
so evil had “no right to exist”. In fact, it was Oppenheimer and Szilard who
led the development of what was almost in totality a Jewish project, so much so
that for many years in scientific circles the atomic bomb was widely known as
“The Jewish hell-bomb”.[17] I
believe it was Eustace Mullins who first coined the phrase, and I believe it
was he who first suggested there was “circumstantial but compelling evidence”
that the Jewish motivation for offering to finance the A-bomb’s development was
to take control of the technology and use it for Germany’s total destruction.”[18] The
theory is more than plausible if you are familiar with the heavily-evidenced
proposition that the underlying purpose of both world wars was the total
destruction of Germany). You can understand why items like this are restricted
to the blank pages in our history book.
Alexander Graham Bell – The Man
Who Didn’t Invent the Telephone
History books tell us the
famous American, Alexander Graham Bell, invented the telephone. This claim has
only two flaws; Bell was Canadian, not American, and he did not invent the
telephone.
An Italian named Antonio Meucci
patented a working telephone many years before Bell did anything.[19] Bell
had obtained copies of Meuci’s drawings and patents and had attempted to obtain
US patents on Meuci’s phone. Meucci discovered Bell’s attempted patent of his
invention and filed a lawsuit against Bell, in support of which he brought from
Italy all his documents, working models, original sketches and his patent, to
present to the court as evidence of his prior invention. The delivery company –
Western Union – was charged with the responsibility as trustee to hold this
evidence for delivery to the court, but all of it “amazingly disappeared
without a trace immediately prior to the court hearing, leaving Meucci with no
proof of anything and thus losing his lawsuit against Bell.” It is worth noting
that at the time Bell was employed at the Western Union lab where Meucci’s
evidence was being stored.
The Italians are still angry
about this. The Italian Historical Association informed us that their
investigation produced evidence of illegal relationships between employees of
the patent office and Bell’s company. And later, during a lawsuit between Bell
and Western Union, it was revealed Bell had agreed to pay Western Union 20% of
all profits from ‘his’ telephone, for 17 years, representing millions of
dollars, sufficient temptation for Western Union to justify “losing” Meucci’s
invention. US media have fabricated at least dozens of tales excusing Bell, a
common one that “due to hardships, Meucci could not renew his patent” and
therefore Bell could take it, but in fact the US government filed charges
against Bell for fraud because of his telephone patent, but powerful friends
had the lawsuit delayed year after year until Meucci died.[20]American
history books and sources like Wikipedia omit these critical facts and twist
the remaining information, and thus Americans grow up believing yet one more
false myth about their country and their innovative ability.
I would make a note here that
when doing historical research we sometimes discover that the landscape has
been so badly polluted by countless individuals amending details to conform to
opinion or ideology (or patriotism) that it becomes nearly impossible to ferret
out the actual facts without an extraordinary amount of work. In this case,
some have claimed (without evidence) that Meucci lost his patent because he
hadn’t the funds to renew it. Others ignore Meucci’s lawsuit against Bell and
claim Bell delivered his phone patent and samples to Western Union for
evaluation and who later claimed to have lost all of it. And so on. Here are
several articles purporting to tell “the real truth”[21][22][23][24]
Thomas Edison – The Man Who
Didn’t Invent Anything
Every American child is taught
in school that the famous American Thomas Edison invented the light bulb,
Wikipedia claiming that Edison was “the fourth most prolific inventor in
history, holding 1,093 US patents in his name, as well as many patents in the
UK, France, and Germany”. Edison is given full credit for inventing the light
bulb, electricity transmission, electric power utilities, sound recording and
motion pictures. All these claims are completely false.[25] Not
only was Edison not one of the most prolific inventors in history, he never
invented anything. Edison himself made the statement: “patents 1047 –
inventions 0”, in recognition of his situation.
The inventions for which Edison
is credited by the Americans were all achieved by others, and his “1,093 US
patents” were all either stolen, bullied, extorted or purchased from those same
inventors. As another author pointed out, “a man who kidnaps or adopts 1,000
children can hardly be deemed the world’s most prolific father, and a man who
steals 1,000 inventions and patents can hardly be deemed the world’s most
prolific inventor”. Thomas Edison was unquestionably one of the world’s most
prolific thieves, and widely known as a con-man and common thug who often
resorted to threats and extortion, but he was no inventor. Edison was mostly
just a thieving opportunist who extorted or stole everything that is listed to
his credit, but in US history books Edison is revered in totally fabricated
myths as the father of the light bulb and America’s most prolific inventor.
The light bulb had been
invented by several people in Europe, one of whom, Heinrich Goebel,
unsuccessfully tried selling it to Edison who claimed to see no value in it
though he was more than happy to purchase the patent from Goebel’s estate when
the man died, cheating his widow out of a substantial sum of money. In any
case, another man, Joseph Wilson Swan developed and patented a working
incandescent light bulb using a carbon filament 20 years before Edison made any
such claim.[26][27] Edison
first tried to steal Swan’s invention and, when that proved legally dangerous,
he made Swan a minor partner in the Ediswan United Company, buying both Swan
and his patented light bulb and claiming the invention for himself. Swan also
invented sound recording and other items which are today credited to Edison.[28]
Every American is taught from
birth that Edison labored for years, trying at least 1,000 different substances
(some say 2,000) before he discovered that twisted carbon would function
acceptably as the filament in a light bulb. The story is entirely false, a myth
fabricated after the fact, a little religious morality play to support faith in
the American Dream – that persistence and hard work will lead to unlimited fame
and riches in the end. Edison did indeed try – and repeatedly failed – to
create a light bulb, and he may well have attempted some of those filament
trials. But all that is irrelevant because Swan had already proven the
effectiveness of a carbon filament when Edison took ownership of his invention
and patent.
Edison is given credit for the
device which made x-rays possible, but the actual inventor was German scientist
Wilhelm Roentgen who publicly displayed x-rays of his wife’s hand years prior
to Edison’s fluoroscope. Similarly, Edison is given credit for inventing
electrical transmission in various forms, but Nicola Tesla brought this
invention to the US and offered it to Edison who took ownership of the process
and patents under a promise of $50,000, then refused to pay Tesla and spent
years in attempts to destroy his name and reputation.
The US-based Science website
dismisses the entire truth about Edison in one cute sentence: “Even though many
of his “inventions” were not unique – and he engaged in some well-publicized
court battles with other inventors whose ideas he “borrowed” – Edison’s skill
at marketing and using his [political] influence often got him the credit.”[29] And
that means Edison patented items that already existed, created by others, and
that had sometimes already been patented. Plus, he had a habit of stealing and
patenting any ideas brought to him by other inventors. Hence, the lawsuits. But
his marketing ability and some powerful political and judicial contacts kept
him out of jail. Nevertheless, the myth has been so thoroughly weaved into
American history, it could never be recalled.
The US government even issued a
special silver dollar coin to commemorate Edison’s non-achievements. And we
have an Edison museum complete with the requisite US flag, providing Americans
with the unique opportunity to experience delusion and patriotism
simultaneously. But the man did invent one thing the history books seem to have
quietly deleted. Edison was a believer in spirits and regularly attended
séances where mediums would receive and transmit messages from the dead. To
more easily conduct these affairs, Edison invented a telephone that he claimed
could talk to people in the spirit world, though he didn’t specify what numbers
to dial. In a conversation with B.C. Forbes, the founder of Forbes magazine,
Edison claimed, “I have been at work for some time building an apparatus … for
personalities which have left this earth to communicate with us”. No idea what
the spirits said to him, and no idea why his promoters deleted this important
item from the history of the world’s greatest inventor.[30]
Coca-Cola
Coca-Cola, originally called
Kola Coca, was invented more than 140 years ago in a small town in Spain, the
creators of the formula for the world’s best-selling soft drink having been
cheated of its ownership and billions of dollars. The process was a well-kept
secret at the time and quickly became a world-famous product, winning dozens of
international gold medals and other awards. Unfortunately, Bautista Aparici,
one of the company’s founders, attended a trade fair in Philadelphia and made
the mistake of giving a sample and a brief description of the process to an
American he happened to meet, and a short time later US pharmacist John
Pemberton changed the name to Coca-Cola and patented the product and process,
the US government refusing to recognise the original Spanish patent.[31][32][33]
The official story is that this
drink was “invented by Dr. John Smith Pemberton on May 8, 1886, at Atlanta,
Georgia”, in the USA, and was named Coca-Cola because at that time it contained
extracts of Coca leaves and Kola nuts, and that the company’s book-keeper
renamed the drink because he thought the two ‘C’s’ would look better in
advertising. None of that is true. The drink was indeed made from kola nuts and
coca leaves, but the new name was a cheap attempt to differentiate itself after
Pemberton stole and patented the original formula. All the stories about
Pemberton inventing Coke’s secret formula in his laboratory are fabricated
nonsense, with the company’s website cleverly designed to airbrush out the
drink’s early history and avoid the truth becoming known. Beverage World
magazine produced a special issue to commemorate the one-hundredth (American)
anniversary of Coca-Cola, claiming Coke was:
“A totally American product
born of a solid idea, nurtured throughout the past century with creative
thinking and bold decision-making, and always plenty of good old-fashioned hard
work. That is as it should be; it is the American way”.
Not by a long shot. Coca-Cola
is just one of hundreds of products the Americans have stolen and patented with
the full protection of their courts operating under the peculiarly American
definition of ‘rule of law’. It isn’t widely-known, though well-documented,
that for decades surrounding the turn of the last century, the US government
offered between $20,000 and $50,000 to anyone who could steal a foreign patent
or product, that amount representing a lifetime’s earnings for an average
person.
To add insult to injury,
Coca-Cola moved into Spain in 1953, sued the original Spanish owners, then
bullied, extorted and bought the rights for a pittance, permitting the firm to
continue producing only a single alcoholic beverage under their name. USA Today
reported on this without even a hint of regret or shame about the rule of law
or fair play or the evils of IP theft. Their only comment: “The Spanish factory
has just four employees left and probably won’t last another generation.” Even
more insultingly, ABC News dismisses this story as “The Spanish firm that
inspired Coke”, although they do state correctly the claim: “Locals believe
that the Spanish town of Aielo de Malferit is where Coca-Cola originated — and
that the factory which developed the formula that inspired the world’s
best-selling soda has been cheated of its rightful place in history. Not to
mention profits.”[34]
The Wright Brothers
For more than 100 years, the
Smithsonian Institution in Washington has had on display an aircraft that was
piloted by Orville and Wilbur Wright in 1903 in Kitty Hawk, North Carolina in
man’s first powered, manned aircraft flight, Americans therefore having created
“The Age of Flight”.
But that was never true, and
the Smithsonian was in on the fraud from the very beginning. In an agreement
with the Wright family to donate the aircraft to the Institution, its officials
signed a pledge to perpetuate the story that the Wrights had made the first
flight, when all present were fully aware the claim was false. And for more
than 100 years the Smithsonian Institution of Historical Mythology, with the
full support of the US government and the media, has done everything in its
power to dismiss, contradict, and just ignore, extensive documentation of other
prior flights in an effort to prevent the dethroning of America in the public
mind.[35][36]
Several people have thoroughly
researched the matter and have written authoritative books on other prior
flights but these have been “denounced by leading aeronautic agencies” (like
the Smithsonian Institution), with the authors dismissed as “unqualified” and
their books “unreliable”. In fact, there were many prior flights, some in
Europe, Canada, South America, and others in the US itself, and the Smithsonian
was fully aware of this. Recently, the editors of the authoritative Jane’s
Aircraft firmly declared that Gustave Whitehead had flown years before the
Wright Brothers. Alberto Santos-Dumont had done the same in Paris, as had
another group in Alberta, Canada.
Moreover, there exists
sufficient evidence the Wrights had access to all that prior knowledge in
building their own aircraft, then claimed it as their own. In addition to other
design features, the Wright brothers claimed ownership of the curved airfoil –
without which no aircraft would ever have gotten off the ground anywhere, but,
as one historian noted, “the Wrights stole both the concept and the actual
design from an Australian who had recorded it years before, and who had himself
deduced the concept from the boomerang of the Australian aboriginals.” The
Wright Brothers stole the idea to build their aircraft, then patented it and
sued others for using it.
Rumors had been circulating for
decades that the Smithsonian had signed what was essentially a contract of
fraud with the Wright family, agreeing to perpetuate the myth of the first
manned flight, in exchange for having the aircraft on permanent display. But
the Directors of the Smithsonian repeatedly denied the existence of such an
agreement, stating that would be “tampering with history” and that they “would
never agree to such a thing.” But then one day a US Senator collected a few
lawyers and descended on the Smithsonian in a kind of political raid. And they
did indeed locate the document, which reads in part: “Neither the Smithsonian
Institution nor its successors nor any museum or other agency, bureau or
facilities administered by the United States of America, shall publish or
permit to be displayed a statement … in respect of any aircraft model … of
earlier date than the Wright Aeroplane of 1903, claiming … that such aircraft
was capable of carrying a man under its own power in controlled flight …”[37]
And now you know how the Wright
Brothers became famous as the first men to fly. One historian wrote that the
Smithsonian had no authority “to engage in political engineering of this sort”,
noting that this “compromises history”. But compromising history is an American
specialty. And this childrens’ tale will never end. Scientific American wrote a
long, biased, and foolish article, claiming the other stories as myths and
their myth as the truth.[38] Other
eminent publications have done the same. This is how history is spun.
To give you an idea of the
enormous influence of the US media and book publishers in maintaining these
myths, in 2015 David McCullough ignored the judgment by Janes (and the world
outside the US), and wrote a new book for Americans that not only perpetuates the
myth but enhances it, with the major US media immediately writing glowing book
reviews to help push sales and get the propaganda back into the public mind.
The Washington Post modestly tells us how “two [American] boys taught the world
to fly.” The publishers, Simon and Schuster, tell us the Wright brothers had
“exceptional courage and determination”, and “ceaseless curiosity”.[39]
Daniel Okrent, in a review of
McCullough’s book in the NYT,[40] adds
that their progress was achieved through “excruciating patience and obsessive
attention to detail” and with “an elegant demonstration of the creativity of
their thinking”. They were “possessed by genius”. Their discovery of the
necessity of a curved airfoil was not copied from Australia, but was the result
of “endless calculation, application and recalculation”, every concoction being
“a dazzling piece of reasoning” pursued with a “grandness of vision”, with the
end result being “the most astonishing feat mankind has ever accomplished”. Yes. Except that it wasn’t.
Notes
[1] Jim
Quinn: A Nation Built On Lies; https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-07-10/jim-quinn-nation-built-lies-part-2
[2] Einstein’s
Plagiarism of the General Theory of Relativity 1st Edition; by Christopher Jon
Bjerknes; https://www.amazon.com/Einsteins-Plagiarism-General-Theory-Relativity/dp/1544900872
[3] Einstein
A Plagiarist Special Relativity; https://educheer.com/term-paper/einstein-a-plagiarist-special-relativity
[4] Time
magazine, July 2006; http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1211594,00.htm
[5] The
Guardian, November 11, 1999; “Einstein’s E=mc² was Italian’s idea”; Clark, R.
W. [1984], Einstein: The Life and Times, Avon Books, New York. De Pretto, O.
[1904], ‘Ipo tesi dell ” et ere nell a vita dell ” universe’, Reale Istituto
Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti, Feb.
[8] https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/01/02/was-einstein-a-wife-beater-womanizer-plagiarizer-and-eugenicist/
[9] A
history of the theories of aether and electricity: https://archive.org/details/historyoftheorie00whitrich
[10] Findings
Back Einstein In a Plagiarism Dispute; https://www.nytimes.com/1997/11/18/science/findings-back-einstein-in-a-plagiarism-dispute.html
[11] Photo
included:
(Link to site below for photo)
[14] Photo
included:
(Link to site below for photo)
[15] In
the end, the Manhattan Project cost the US military between US$2 and US$3
billion, in dollars of the day.
[16] The
average annual income in the US in 1935 was about $1,500, thus this represents
about 65 years of average income.
[17] The
Secret History Of The Atomic Bomb by Eustace C. Mullins; http://whale.to/b/mullins8.html
[19] Antonio
Meucci – Biography, Facts and Pictures; https://www.famousscientists.org/antonio-meucci
[20] The
United States Government vs. Alexander Graham Bell; www.chezbasilio.org/us_bell.htm
[26] Joseph
Swan – Wikipedia; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Swan
[27] Joseph
Swan | Biography, Lightbulb, & Facts; https://www.britannica.com/biography/Joseph-Wilson-Swan
[28] Edison
& Swan United Electric Light Company is Established; https://worldhistoryproject.org/1883/edison-swan-united-electric-light-company-is-established
[29] Thomas
A. Edison and the Founding of Science:
science.sciencemag.org/content/105/2719/142
[30] Thomas
Edison, B.C. Forbes And The Mystery Of The Spirit Phone; https://www.forbes.com/…/2019/10/25/thomas-edison-bc-forbes-mystery-spirit-phone
[31] Spanish
town claims origins of Coca-Cola; https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2013/08/10/newser-spanish-town-coca-cola/2638515/
[33] https://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/locals-say-coca-cola-originated-in-aielo-de-malferit-in-spain-a-915371.html
[34] Fizzing
Out: The Spanish Firm that Inspired Coke – ABC News; https://abcnews.go.com/International/fizzing-spanish-firm-inspired-coke/story?id=19918738
[35] https://www.foxnews.com/science/smithsonian-releases-wright-brothers-contract-detailing-first-in-flight-claims
[36] https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/5/130503-wright-brothers-first-flight-gustave-whitehead-aviation-smithsonian-institution-adventure-world/
