This is one of those
investigations in which you ask yourself, IS THE PHENOMENON, AS DESCRIBED,
REAL? That’s where I started. At this point, I’ve written well over 150
articles about COVID-19.
And of course, the phenomenon is not real.
Most people wouldn’t be able to
grasp that. They’re stuck at the gate, saying, PEOPLE ARE DYING, IT MUST BE THE
VIRUS.
Well, people are always dying. It’s very easy to repackage their
deaths under a new label. And those that are dying for new reasons…you can
track down those reasons, too. In a few places, it’s pollution, in another
place it could well be a previous vaccine campaign, and so on. In New York, a
lot of people are dying premature deaths because they’re put on breathing
ventilators and heavily sedated.
As I laid out in several key articles, proper procedures of viral
discovery were never carried out in China or anywhere else. There is no
convincing proof researchers ever found a new virus.
Therefore, every piece of so-called information coming from “new
virus” has no foundation whatsoever. For example, the diagnostic tests. Tests
for what? And then, the case numbers would be meaningless as well.
But again, these facts are hard for people to swallow. They want
to believe. They believe they must believe. It’s a theocracy.
In the set-up, there are two positions you can take. You can stand
outside the whole illusion and expose it; or you can enter the illusion and
then show internal contradictions and lies and false pictures, within the
fraud.
For instance, the case numbers. I’ve explained ways the CDC and
other agencies are fiddling them, inflating them. I’ve also stood outside the
whole case number game and pointed out it’s without meaning, because, again,
the existence of a new virus hasn’t been proven. The tests, all of them, are
supposed to be evidence of the presence of the virus.
You can be OUTSIDE or INSIDE. Or both.
Let’s say someone publishes a photo of 510th Street in New York
during rush hour. You can simply say there is no 510th Street in New York. Or
you can look at the details of the photo. You can say, “You see that man
wearing a fleecy winter coat and a long scarf? Now look behind him. There are
three girls wearing bikinis waiting for a bus. Doesn’t that seem odd?”
You can also make a circumstantial case. That’s a third aspect of
an investigation. “Look, this man accused of check forgery has been convicted
three times in other states for the same crime. He worked for his uncle, who
went to prison for forgery in France. Right now, he lives above a store where a
check forger is turning out fake checks.”
I’ve done that with the virus—showing that, back through history,
the so-called discovery of a new virus, and its promotion, have been used to
obscure, and stand in for, other forms of killing. Industrial pollution, forced
starvation, purposeful contamination of water supplies, treatment with highly
toxic medical drugs and vaccines. The story about a virus protects the killers.
As you can see, I’m explaining all this in a very straightforward
way. Now. But in 1987, when the issue was AIDS and HIV, and I was writing a
book on the subject, I waded through a mass of confusion for months. The
confusion was caused by me being inside the picture and not knowing there was
an outside. When I finally realized what was going on, a large number of
seemingly disparate pieces of information clicked into place. I saw the
landscape. I saw what was in it, and I could stand away from it and look at it
as a whole.
As a fourth consideration, you could examine the history of the
teachings that train and predispose people to believe in a phenomenon that is
not real. In this case, teachings about germs. Teachings that indicate germs
are as dangerous as nitroglycerin. Teachings that claim disease comes directly
from germs—ignoring, for example, the fact that people have intrinsic immune
defenses. Mind control through germ theory is a long story that I’m just
briefly mentioning. But it’s very useful to see how indoctrination works in the
background; when the next big epidemic is announced, most people immediately
fall in line. They’re confirming what they’ve been taught to believe. It’s
another church.
There was the church of HIV, the church of West Nile, the church
of SARS, Swine Flu, Zika, Bird Flu, and so on.
Speaking of teachings—one of the most important predispositions
that people cling to like life rafts is: one effect, one cause. The effect
would be COVID-19, and the cause would be the coronavirus. But the effect is
not One Thing. As I stated above, people are actually dying as a result of
different conditions…which have different causes. Grasping this produces a very
beneficial explosion that scatters much mind control.
Another predisposition is the illogical notion that the effect
proves the cause. “Well, look at the all the lockdowns (effect); therefore, the
cause, the justification must be the dangerous virus.” Nonsense. Aristotle
exposed that fallacy a long time ago.
“But…but I don’t care. People are dying, it must be the virus. I
believe.”
Yes, people believe. When has that not been the case?
And when they believe, they ask a few typical questions. “But what
about the people dying in Italy?” They are the BUT WHAT ABOUT people. They
always have another WHAT ABOUT. Or they’ll say, “There was a boy who suddenly
died in Montana, how do you explain that?” The HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN people.
I explain what I can, based on evidence I’ve put together. I don’t
know what happened to the boy in Montana or the girl in India or the mother in
Mongolia. But I do know there is no particular reason to assume the virus was
the cause of death.
True believers tend to put things together this way: the news
reports an unusual death; it’s impossible to understand what happened from the
account; unusual effect must equal an unusual cause; the COVID virus would be
unusual; therefore, the virus caused the unusual death. Preposterous, but there
it is. You can take a sledgehammer to that pillar of dull thought, and you
won’t knock it down in a hundred years.
Then we come to the question of conspiracy. This can also be
called: who benefits? People mistakenly assume that a conspiracy is like a bank
robbery. A small number of people walk into a bank and take the money. They
benefit. But in a conspiracy, there are compartmentalized beneficiaries, and they
aren’t all plotting together. Most beneficiaries see an opportunity and they
take it.
Drug companies make money on the vaccine and the drugs used to
treat COVID-19 patients. State governments receive federal money to “fight the
virus.” Researchers win promotions. Public health agencies obtain more funding,
and more power. Financiers buy up devalued properties at bargain prices. At the
top of the ladder, key plotters contrive selling the story of a new killer
virus, because they intend to use it to lock down the planet. Why? Because they
want to torpedo economies and move in on the wreckage and build a new economic,
social, and political world order. It doesn’t take thousands or millions of
people—all in the know—to foist a conspiracy. Far from it.
An investigation of a story makes the story fall apart. You see it
in a different light. You no longer believe the central narrative. You keep
asking deeper questions about basic assertions contained in the story, and your
answers produce more collapses of the cement that holds the story together.
Finally, for now, there
is the matter of individual choice and responsibility. Individuals can believe
or not believe. There is always that option. People are not doomed to accept an
oppressive narrative imposed on them. If that were the case, there would be no
point to human thought or action. We would forever be victims. This is not the
case. It never was. Some people are dedicated to the notion that there is no
way out of the dungeon of external control. Their dedication to this
proposition has great tonnage. For them. They purposely ignore the fact that,
down through history, there has been an enormous struggle to establish
individual freedom, and this war has been astonishingly successful—relative to
older despotisms and tyrannies. In fact, their choice, now, to walk around
spraying doom of whatever brand they want to sell is evidence of that freedom.
I’m not impressed by doom. I’m impressed by freedom. We are in yet another
fight for it now. I’m impressed by individuals who use their freedom to make
their best vision into fact in the world. My investigations are aimed at
exposing the power players who plot and fight against freedom.
Jon Rappoport
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a
candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of
California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose
of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer
Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing
articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon
has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and
creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews
emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine
emails here.
