(This excerpt is just a sample. - CL)
CDC/FDAsmoking gun of smoking guns.
They
confess: they had no virus when they concocted the test for the virus; they
“contrived” a model by pretending to find what they wanted to find; it’s called
a self-fulfilling prophecy.
This
is the con and the crime that drove millions of lives, and economies, into
ruin.
The
CDC has issued a document that bulges with devastating admissions.
The
release is titled, “07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2
Testing.” It begins explosively:
“After
December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC
2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay
first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is
providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time
to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”
CDC/FDA
are confessing there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used
to detect the virus, starting in February of 2020—right up to this minute.
In
other words, the millions and millions of “COVID cases” based on the PCR test
in use are all suspect. Actually, that statement is too generous. Every test
result of every PCR test should be thrown out.
To
confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, “SARS-CoV-2 Reference Panel Comparative Data.” Here
is a killer quote:
“During
the early months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical
specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to developers of IVDs [in
vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, the FDA authorized IVDs
based on available data from contrived samples generated from a range of
SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or
whole genome viral RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation.
While validation using these contrived specimens provided a measure of
confidence in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not
feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used
contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples
derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid
sources.”
Translation:
We, at the CDC, did not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we
concocted the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Yes, it’s unbelievable, right? And
that’s the test we’ve been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the
virus. We fabricated. We lied. We made up [invented] synthetic gene sequences
and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2,
without having the faintest idea of what we were doing, because, again, we
didn’t have an actual specimen of the virus. We had no proof THERE WAS
something called SARS-CoV-2.
This
amazing FDA document goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to
59 different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic. 59. And,
“…it is not feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests that
used contrived specimens because each test validated performance using samples
derived from different gene specific, synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid
sources.”
Translation:
Each of the 59 different PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and
concocted different fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus—the
virus we didn’t have. Obviously, then, these tests would give unreliable
results. THE PCR TESTS USED CONTRIVED SPECIMENS OF THE VIRUS WE DIDN’T HAVE.
