As my long-time readers know, I have emphasized for decades that in the United States race and gender privileges later extended to sexual perverts have replaced equality under the law ever since Alfred Blumrosen, a federal bureaucrat who was compliance chief for the EEOC, established a quota regime for university admissions, employment, and promotion 60 years ago. This was not merely an attack on white heterosexual males. It was also an attack on equality under law, on a merit-based society and on the traditional roles of men and women in society. No other decision has had more adverse effect on American Society.
The statutory language of the 1964 Civil Rights Act explicitly prohibits any race and gender quotas. However, Blumrosen reasoned that the federal judiciary in keeping with its tradition of deferring to regulatory agencies’ interpretations of laws would overlook his rewrite of the law should anyone have standing to challenge his ruling. Thanks to Alfred Blumrosen, white heterosexual American males have been second-class citizens without equal rights and equal protection of law for six decades. Yet they are alleged to have “white privilege.”
Among the US liberal-left, university and media crowd, “white privilege” is not merely an article of faith but also a proven undeniable fact, thereby turning lies into facts, something that we now take for granted as we do when Trump’s lies are treated as facts. This is another cost of Blumrosen.
In his article in the Unz Review, “Exposing Black Privilege: A Cursory Outline of Racial Prostration in American Life,” Richard Parker writes that there is no “white privilege” to examine and turns instead to innumerable examples of black privilege. I have written for years about these multiplying privileges and how they are being institutionalized in law, practice, consciousness, and society, resulting in a two-tiered legal system in which white heterosexual males are grouped together in the bottom tier.......