America is not, and has never been, an idea.
America is a nation, which means, by definition, that Americans are an actual
and distinct living people. The claim that America is an idea or a creed is not
merely an insult, it is an existential attack on the genetic Posterity of the
American Revolution, a nation that has been invaded, adulterated, betrayed,
confused, and demoralized to the point that it doesn't recognize itself or even
know what it is.
If you want to know why the military doesn't
defend the borders, and why the people don't defend their lands, their
neighborhoods, or their families, it is because the American nation has been
literally robbed of its identity. And that is why the charlatans and
gatekeepers of the Right condemn identity politics, identity, and nationalism
so vehemently, because they are alien usurpers who are desperate to keep the
rightful heirs of the Revolution from claiming the very country their
forefathers founded.
But they're not, they never were,
and they never will be. A telling confession from a review of an entirely unnecessary book by
the eminently contemptible Max Boot.
The best bits of The Corrosion of Conservatism come early, when Boot
describes his childhood under Soviet tyranny and his years as a precocious,
politically hyper-conscious teenager in Reagan-era California. The most
sympathetic character we encounter is his mother—the fiercely loving émigré,
who “enrolled me in swim classes, piano lessons, and Hebrew school to give me
the athletic, musical, and religious education that she had lacked.” All this,
though money was tight and his father largely absent.
Yet Boot never took to sports, nor the piano, nor Hebrew study, and he didn’t retain his native Russian. His real passion was America. Boot was six years old when pressure exerted by Sen. Henry Jackson forced the communist regime to allow families like his to emigrate. In a passage that had me underlining and writing “Amen!” in the margins, he explains: “I have never visited Russia since leaving. I feel entirely American.” That describes my own immigrant sensibility, though I came from Iran just before I turned fourteen.
But it soon becomes clear that Boot views his adopted homeland through a set of abstract, free-floating propositions about rights and norms—his patriotism is attached to liberal proceduralism. The religious and spiritual warp and weft of the land elude him entirely. That is, when he isn’t disgusted by them.
Yet Boot never took to sports, nor the piano, nor Hebrew study, and he didn’t retain his native Russian. His real passion was America. Boot was six years old when pressure exerted by Sen. Henry Jackson forced the communist regime to allow families like his to emigrate. In a passage that had me underlining and writing “Amen!” in the margins, he explains: “I have never visited Russia since leaving. I feel entirely American.” That describes my own immigrant sensibility, though I came from Iran just before I turned fourteen.
But it soon becomes clear that Boot views his adopted homeland through a set of abstract, free-floating propositions about rights and norms—his patriotism is attached to liberal proceduralism. The religious and spiritual warp and weft of the land elude him entirely. That is, when he isn’t disgusted by them.
America is not, and has never been,
an idea. America is a nation, which means, by definition, that Americans are an
actual and distinct living people. The claim that America is an idea or
a creed is not merely an insult, it is an existential attack on the genetic
Posterity of the American Revolution, a nation that has been invaded,
adulterated, betrayed, confused, and demoralized to the point that it doesn't
recognize itself or even know what it is.
If you want to know why the military doesn't defend the borders, and why the people don't defend their lands, their neighborhoods, or their families, it is because the American nation has been literally robbed of its identity. And that is why the charlatans and gatekeepers of the Right condemn identity politics, identity, and nationalism so vehemently, because they are alien usurpers who are desperate to keep the rightful heirs of the Revolution from claiming the very country their forefathers founded.
The review is much more perspicacious than the book, which makes sense, if one considers who the author of the latter is, even though the reviewer's identity complications prevent him from grasping why the metaphysical ideals of the West have been eclipsed.
If you want to know why the military doesn't defend the borders, and why the people don't defend their lands, their neighborhoods, or their families, it is because the American nation has been literally robbed of its identity. And that is why the charlatans and gatekeepers of the Right condemn identity politics, identity, and nationalism so vehemently, because they are alien usurpers who are desperate to keep the rightful heirs of the Revolution from claiming the very country their forefathers founded.
The review is much more perspicacious than the book, which makes sense, if one considers who the author of the latter is, even though the reviewer's identity complications prevent him from grasping why the metaphysical ideals of the West have been eclipsed.
Without a shared vision of the common good, society devolves into
consumerist cliques and warring tribal factions. With the eclipse of the
metaphysical ideals that underlie their conception of reason, America and the
West can barely address other civilizations, much less win them over. And it
turns out that the consent principle, without more, can authorize all manner of
degradation, most shockingly evident in such phenomena as the sale of children
and wombs in surrogacy, the unrestricted circulation of hard-core, misogynistic
pornography under the banner of “free speech,” and the legalization of
death-by-doctor throughout the developed world.
The liberal consensus, then, has emerged as a profoundly illiberal, repressive force—precisely because it grants the autonomous individual such wide berth to define what is good and true. If maximizing individual autonomy is the highest good and, indeed, the very purpose of political community, then for Chelsea Manning to exercise “her” autonomy requires the state to compel the rest of us to say that “she” wasn’t born male. And even absent state compulsion, as already exists in Canada and elsewhere, the institutions charged with upholding the consensus—corporations, big tech, universities, and elite media—can exact a high price for dissent.
The free world doesn’t feel free.
The liberal consensus, then, has emerged as a profoundly illiberal, repressive force—precisely because it grants the autonomous individual such wide berth to define what is good and true. If maximizing individual autonomy is the highest good and, indeed, the very purpose of political community, then for Chelsea Manning to exercise “her” autonomy requires the state to compel the rest of us to say that “she” wasn’t born male. And even absent state compulsion, as already exists in Canada and elsewhere, the institutions charged with upholding the consensus—corporations, big tech, universities, and elite media—can exact a high price for dissent.
The free world doesn’t feel free.
