In recent years, Jews and Western elites have been subject to popular accusations about their secret desire to molest or hurt children.
The
Q-Anon movement — largely embraced by older conservatives — is the greatest
embodiment of this tendency. Q Anon is not “anti-Semitic,” nor is it on its
face threatening to the actual power structure, yet prominent Jewish
organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League have prioritized its suppression online.
While Q fans often occupy their time chasing
wild geese and steer clear of confrontations with Jewish power, Jewish-funded
Genocide Watch president Gregory Stanton recently took to the airwaves condemning
the impulse of the misguided pedophile-hunters as “Nazism” and “anti-Semitism”
— an accusation conspiracy theorists received with confusion and anger.
With the exception of generic and
individualized implications of George Soros and the Rothschilds, there is no
obvious reason for the Jewish community to find the silliness of Q-Anon to be a
potential challenge.
But a deeper study into the post-war Jewish
consensus (domestic liberal maximalism, suppressing Gentile authoritarianism),
as well as what appears to be Jewish-led institutional preparations to make
pedophilia the next barrier to break down in the sexual revolution, goes a long
way in explaining the concern.
Authoritarians, Jews and Pedophiles
Numerous studies have found a powerful link
between personalities that score high on the “authoritarian” scale (dislike of
change, valuing stability and order, anti-cosmopolitan attitudes) and the
desire to punish child molestation.
Jewish scholars have specifically singled out
the “authoritarian” segments of a given population as embodying a dormant
Fascism — an unconscious and potentially anti-Semitic cell that can be rapidly
awakened and mobilized in a wide variety of social-historical contexts.
The Frankfurt School, Wilhelm Reich, and
various Jewish social scientists to this day have dedicated much of their
professional careers seeking ways to identify and deconstruct the social forces
that breed authoritarian collectives and their desire to resist
multiculturalism, sexual license, hyper-individualism, and even wealth
inequality. The desire of Jews to prevent the rise of another Hitler underlines
the “anti-fascist” creed that books like R.R. Reno’s Return of
the Strong Gods have demonstrated
underpins the ruling post-war American ideology.
The “repression” of infantile sexuality,
according to Jews who studied the rise of Fascism, is the most consistent
predictor of authoritarian tendencies. Using Freud’s widely debunked Oedipus
Complex, historic anti-fascists purport
that exposing small children to sexuality is the key to immunizing them from
the appeal of Fascist ideas when they become adults.
Wilhelm Reich’s highly influential 1933
frontal attack on both German Nationalsocialism and the USSR under Stalin
stated this explicitly:
Suppression of the natural
sexuality of the child, particularly of its genital sexuality, makes the child
apprehensive, shy, obedient, afraid of authority, “good” and “adjusted” in the
authoritarian sense; it paralyzes the rebellious forces because any rebellion
is laden with anxiety; it produces, by inhibiting sexual curiosity and sexual
thinking in the child, a general inhibition of thinking and of critical
faculties. In brief, the goal of sexual suppression is that of producing an
individual who is adjusted to the authoritarian order and who will submit to it
in spite of all misery and degradation. At first, the child has to adjust to
the structure of the authoritarian miniature state, the family; this makes it
capable of later subordination to the general authoritarian system. The
formation of the authoritarian structure takes place through the anchoring of
sexual inhibition and sexual anxiety.
Reich’s book, in non-ideological terms,
observes that a strong and united heterosexual family unit that instills moral
values in its children and shields them from pre-pubescent sexual experiences
creates the building blocks for organic community and social harmony that
populists can later “exploit.”
Sexual repression and anti-Semitism –populist
opposition to unfair and destructive concentrations of Jewish power — thus walk
hand-in-hand.
Reich’s communist past and seeming endorsement
of sex with children enabled by the destruction of the family was not
well-received during his time. While the story of the Jewish Marxist being
driven out of the Third Reich and his books burned is often featured in
“Holocaust” and liberal lore, less known is the fact that he was constantly harangued by the US
government during the 1950s, culminating in a federal court ordering his books
be burned again.
A slightly watered down and updated version of
Reich’s theories were developed undisturbed by the American Jewish Committee in
1950 — The Authoritarian Personality by Theodore Adorno, Else Frenkel, Daniel Levinson and others.
Adorno et al drew from Freudian infantile
sexuality theory, but did not go so far as to outright endorse molesting
children to prevent Fascism. Instead, the compromise for reducing the number of
individuals rating high on the “F-scale” (Fascism) was prescriptions to
undermine traditional Western concepts of the family (such as through
feminism), end corporal punishment, and promote sexual depravity
(homosexuality, transgenderism, etc) more aggressively.
Theories by Adorno and Reich remain the broad
consensus among today’s academy. The rise of white populism in Western
countries and some non-Western countries has largely been contained by Jewish
organizations, but with this has come a renewed interest in not just studying
the phenomenon from the perspective of it being a perverted “threat to
democracy,” as Yascha Mounk’s The People vs. Democracycontends, but also in accelerating social-liberal anti-social
trends ahead of schedule.
The 1960s: Gay Rights and Pedophilia
Advocacy for legalizing pedophilia is nothing new in
post-war Western nations. Influential Jewish and homosexual intellectual and
cultural leaders like Allen Ginsburg, Jacques Derrida, Michel Foucault, Hakim
Bey, Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Gabriel Matzneff, et al –fueled by Jewish anti-fascist
hysterics and the theories of Reich, Freud, and Adorno — openly promoted sex with small
children as an act of liberation — unimaginable in 2020.
Groups like NAMBLA (North American Man Boy
Love Association) were generally accepted as fellow travelers in the “LGBT”
movement of its time and were members of mainstream gay advocacy organizations like
the International Gay and Lesbian Alliance (ILGA). In the UK, the Pedophile Informational Exchange was
also involved with gay activism. The Netherlands, France, Germany and other
liberal states all had parallel above-ground groups dedicated to lowering or
abolishing the age of consent, sometimes embraced by mainstream political
organizations like the German Green Party (which for years
was represented by Daniel-Cohn Bendit in the European Parliament).
The reaction was delayed, but it came. By the
1980s a social conservative wave took hold in the United States, expressed by
the landslide election of Ronald Reagan and his Christian supporters, sparked
in part by the AIDS epidemic and disquietude with the sexual revolution in the
1960s and 70s.
By the 90s, the LGBT movement began to strategically distance itself from
pedophiles, understanding that during their initial shot for “queer
liberation,” the then settled science linking homosexuality with pedophilia and
other anti-social behaviors (as paraphilia) was the 8-ball that set them back —
thanks to groups like Anita Bryant’s Save Our Children movement founded in 1977
— as much as AIDS.
The Pro-Pedophile Revival
As with other once aberrant movements now
dominant in American life (critical race theory, LGBT, etc) the seeds for
pedophile activism are being planted by homosexual and Jewish figures.
While “authoritarians” often appear paranoid
or hysterical in their hunt for pedophiles in Wayfair cabinets, their concern is not unfounded.
The recent 6-3 decision by the conservative
majority Supreme Court to add “transgender” sexual deviants to the category of
federally protected minority was a massive victory for the well-funded but
unpopular transsexual movement movement. With figures such as Lady
MAGA now receiving red carpet treatment in “respectable”
conservative circles, it’s clear that America’s institutional individualistic
right-liberals are not only surrendering opposition to the barbaric practice of
surgically and chemically trying to change a child’s sex, it doesn’t even have
the moral or intellectual categories needed to confidently fight the trend to
begin with.
It’s no coincidence that concerns about
pedophile-normalization have now hit a crescendo in the wake of mainstream
Christians and the Republican Party utterly failing to stop the Jewish funded transsexual movement.
The revival of the pedophile-acceptance
movement is currently being led by organizations such as B4U ACT.
B4U-ACT, founded in 2003 by the Jew Michael F.
Melsheimer, states on its website that its mission is to provide mental health
services to individuals who express sexual desire for children.
In practice, B4U-ACT has been at the forefront
of attempting to erase social boundaries and stigmas related to pedophilia
through a top-down coup.
The American Psychological Association (APA)
removing homosexuality from its list of mental illnesses in 1973 under activist
pressure is widely accepted as the turning point for the
mainstreaming of homosexuality.
Individuals at B4U-ACT are mirroring this
strategy. A symposium hosted by the organization
in 2011 called for pressuring the APA to reclassify pedophilia as a
non-criminal “sexual orientation” and begin using the politically correct term
Minor Attracted Person (MAP) in the interest of tolerance. Observers noted that
the conference seemed to be aimed at deliberately obfuscating right and wrong
in respects to the act of abusing children.
The event was attended and supported almost
entirely by Jews. Speakers included B4U-ACT director Dr. Richard Kramer, Johns
Hopkins University director of the Sexual Behavior Consultation Unit Frederick
Saul Berlin and London School of Economics professor of Gender and Sexuality
Jacob Breslow.
B4U-ACT was initially successful. The 2013
update to the APA’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(DSM-5) subsequently reclassified pedophilia as a mere sexual orientation. When
vigilant Christian groups like the American Family Association led an outraged
protest, the APA retracted the edition and claimed it
was an accident.
A number of attempts by the mainstream media
to “meme” the concept of a “virtuous pedophile” — a concept invented
and pioneered by another pro-pedophile group The Global
Prevention Project — such as Salon’s Todd Nickerson articles or “documentaries” like I,
Pedophile have not been
well-received.
Yet in spite of this, pedophiles seeking to
politically organize caught a big break in 2018, when Canadian-Jew and
homosexual activist Dr. James Cantor wrote a letterto Twitter’s Trust & Safety
Department demanding that the company allow its platform to become the home of
“MAPS” looking to network with one another without getting banned. Today it is
common to see self-described open pedophiles on Twitter, often sporting their
own rainbow sexual identitarian flag.
Pedophile advocacy on the left — specifically
in anarchist and “gay liberation” circles — has also started to make inroads in
recent years. Radical leftist Derrick Jensen’s 2019 book Anarchism
and the Politics of Violation,
which brought attention to the fact that the
founders of “Queer Theory” and transgenderism (Jews such as Judith Butler and
Gayle Rubin) were also advocates of pedophilia, was pulled before publication
by the Penguin-Random House imprint, Seven Stories Books.
Jensen’s “cancellation,” including his ban
from Youtube, was the response his critiques met by a hardening consensus in
academic and leftist circles in support of “marginalized” pedosexuals.
Hakim Bey, once discredited in left-wing
circles for his NAMBLA membership and advocacy for child rape, has re-emerged
in recent years as the principle inspirationfor CHAZ in Seattle.
Various “hipster” left-liberal publications
aggressively promote Sophie Lewis, a Jewish leftist who calls for the forced abolition of the family in the
interest of “queer children.” Wealthy Brooklyn Socialite and Jacobin
Magazine fixture Liza Featherstone
has been repeatedly criticized for what many perceive to apologetic discourse
in respects to pedophilia.
It is clear to any neutral observer that this is about to become a
problem. While many cannot articulate it, the collective unconscious can feel
it.
Q-Anon and other Trump-aligned movements serve
as a perfect foil to begin turning universal moral opposition to abusing kids
into another controlled culture war conflict the right is bound to lose.
In the Jewish calculation, the trauma-induced
mistrust of adult authority figures means Fascism and gentile authoritarianism
are defeated forever.
As we float into uncharted waters, their
theory will be put to the test.
https://www.unz.com/estriker/authoritarians-and-jews-the-push-to-normalize-pedophilia/
