It’s fascinating to see how the definition of antisemitism is now being expanded to include accurately quoting something that a Jew has said about his genuine intentions, motivations, and objectives. Especially when we’re now reaching the stage that a comparison of current Israeli rhetoric with historical National Socialist rhetoric is unfair to the latter, as evidenced by the recent genocidal rantings of Israeli National Security Minister Ben-Gvir:...
If I ran around scalping people and offered the defense that it was justified because my relatives had been massacred in previous centuries, as they quite literally were, I would likely be declared insane. So anyone, and particularly any Christian, who still entertains the idea that God will bless them for supporting this murderous psychopathy needs therapy and quite possibly an exorcism.
And if you’re going to accuse everyone who is unabashedly sane, anti-satanic, and anti-psychopathic of being anti-semitic, well, you should probably stop and think very hard about the unavoidable implications of your accusation. While you’re at it, you would also do well to look into the linguistic etymology of “the accuser”.
