A few years ago, very few
people understood the concept behind color revolutions.
Had
Russia and China’s leadership not decided to unite in solidarity in 2012 when they began vetoing the
overthrow of Bashar al Assad in Syria- followed by their alliance around the Belt and Road Initiative,
then it is doubtful that the color revolution concept would be as well-known as
it has become today.
At
that time, Russia and China realized that they had no choice but to go on the
counter offensive, since the regime change operations and colour revolutions
orchestrated by such organizations as the CIA-affiliated National Endowment for Democracy (NED)
and Soros Open Society
Foundations were ultimately designed to target them as those
rose, orange, green or yellow revolution efforts in Georgia, Ukraine, Iran or
Hong Kong were always recognized as weak points on the periphery of the
threatened formation of a great power alliance of sovereign Eurasian nations
that would have the collective power to challenge the power of the
Anglo-American elite based in London and Wall Street.
Russia’s 2015 expulsion of
12 major conduits of color revolution included Soros’ Open Society Foundation
as well as the NED was a powerful calling out of the enemy with the Foreign
Ministry calling them “a
threat to the foundations of Russia’s Constitutional order and national
security”. This resulted in such fanatical calls by George
Soros for a $50 billion fund to
counteract Russia’s interference in defense of Ukraine’s democracy. Apparently
the $5 billion spent by the NED in
Ukraine was not nearly enough (1).
In
spite of the light falling upon these cockroaches, NED and Open Society
operations continued in full force focusing on the weakest links the Grand
Chessboard unleashing what has become known as a “strategy of tension”.
Venezuela, Kashmir, Hong Kong, Tibet and Xinjian (dubbed East Turkistan by NED)
have all been targeted in recent years with millions of NED dollars pouring
into separatist groups, labour unions, student movements and fake news “opinion
shapers” under the guise of “democracy building”. $1.7 million in grants was
spent by NED in Hong Kong since 2017 which was a significant increase from
their $400 000 spent to coordinate the failed “Occupy HK” protest in 2014.
The Case of China
In
response to over two months of controlled chaos, the Chinese government has
kept a remarkably restrained posture, allowing the Hong Kong authorities to
manage the situation with their police deprived of use of lethal weapons and
even giving into the protestors’ demand that the changes to the extradition
treaty that nominally sparked this mess be annulled. In spite of this patient
tone, the rioters who have run havoc on airports and public buildings have
created lists of demands that are all but impossible for mainland China to meet
including 1) an “independent committee to investigate the abuses of Chinese
authorities”, 2) for china to stop referring to rioters as “rioters”, 3) for
all charges against rioters to be dropped, and 4) universal suffrage- including
candidates promoting independence or rejoining the British Empire.
As
violence continues to grow, and as it has become an increasing reality that
some form of intervention from the mainland may occur to restore order, the
British Foreign Office has taken an aggressive tone threatening China with
“severe consequences” unless “a fully independent investigation” into police
Brutality were permitted. The former Colonial Governor of China Christopher
Patten attacked China by saying “Since president Xi has been in office, there’s
been a crackdown on dissent and dissidents everywhere, the party has been in
control of everything”.
The
Chinese Foreign Ministry responded saying “the UK has no sovereign jurisdiction or right of
supervision over Hong Kong… it is simply wrong for the British Government to
exert pressure. The Chinese side seriously urges the UK to stop its
interference in China’s internal affairs and stop making random and
inflammatory accusations on Hong Kong.”
The
British have not been able to conduct their manipulation of Hong Kong without
the vital role of America’s NGO dirty ops, and in true imperial fashion, the
political class from both sides of the aisle have attacked China with Senate
Majority leader Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi making the loudest noise
driving the American House Foreign Affairs Committee to threaten “universal condemnation and
swift consequences” if Beijing intervenes. This has only made the photographs
of Julie Eadeh, the head of Political Office at the American Consulate in Hong
Kong meeting with leaders of the Hong Kong demonstrations that much more
disgusting to any onlooker.
While
both Britain and America have been caught red handed organizing this colour
revolution, it is important to keep in mind who is controlling who.
The Foreign Origins of the NED
Contrary
to popular opinion, the British Empire did not go away after WWII, nor did it
hand over the “keys to the kingdom” to America. It didn’t even become America’s
Junior Partner in a new Anglo-American special relationship. Contrary to
popular belief, it stayed in the drivers’ seat.
The
post WWII order was largely shaped by a British coup which didn’t take over
America without a fight. Nests of Oxford-trained Rhodes Scholars, Fabiansand
other ideologues embedded within the American establishment had a lot of work
ahead of them as they struggled to purge all nationalist impulses from the
American intelligence community. While the most aggressive purging of patriotic
Americans from the intelligence community occurred during the dissolution of
the OSS and creation of CIA in 1947 and the Communist witch hunt that followed,
there were other purges that were less well known.
As
an organization which was beginning to take form which was to become known as
the Trilateral Commission organized
by Britain’s “hand in America” called the Council on Foreign Relations and
international Bilderberg Group, another purge occurred in 1970 under the
direction of James Schlesinger during his six month stint as CIA director. At
that time 1000 top CIA officials deemed “unfit” were fired. This was followed nine
years later as another 800 were fired under a list drafted by CIA “spymaster” Ted Shackley. Both
Schlesinger and Shackley were high level Trilateral Commission members who took
part in the group’s 1973 formation and fully took power of America during Jimmy
Carter’s 1977-1981 presidency which unleashed a dystopian reorganization of
American foreign and internal policy outlined in my previous report.
Project Democracy Takes Over
By
the 1970s, the CIA’s dirty hand funding anarchist operations both within
America and abroad had become too well known as media coverage of their dirty
operations at home and abroad spoiled the patriotic image which the
intelligence community then desired. While the internal resistance to fascist
behaviour from within the intelligence Community itself was dealt with through
purges, the reality was that a new agency had to be created to take over those
functions of covert destabilization of foreign governments.
What
became Project
Democracy herein originated with a Trilateral Commission
meeting in May 31, 1975 in Kyoto Japan as a protégé of Trilateral Commission
director Zbigniew Brzezinski named Samuel (Clash of Civilizations) Huntington
delivered the results of his Task Force on the Governability of
Democracies. This
project was supervised by Schlesinger and Brzezinski and presented the notion
that democracies could not function adequately in the crisis conditions which
the Trilateral Commission was preparing to impose onto America and the world
through a process dubbed “the Controlled Disintegration of
Society”.
The
Huntington report featured at the Trilateral meeting stated: “One might consider… means of securing
support and resources from foundations, business corporations, labor unions,
political parties, civic associations, and, where possible and appropriate,
governmental agencies for the creation of an institute for the strengthening of
democratic institutions.”
It
took 4 years for this blueprint to become reality. In 1979 three Trilateral Commission
members named William Brock (RNC Chairman), Charles Manatt (DNC Chairman) and
George Agree (head of Freedom House) established an organization called the American Political Foundation (APF)
which attempted to fulfil the objective laid out by Huntington in 1975.
The
APF was used to set up a program using federal funds called the Democracy
Program which issued an interim report “The
Commitment to Democracy” which said: “No theme requires more sustained
attention in our time than the necessity for strengthening the future chances
of democratic societies in a world that remains predominantly unfree or
partially fettered by repressive governments. … There has never been a
comprehensive structure for a non-governmental effort through which the
resources of America’s pluralistic constituencies . .. could be mobilized
effectively.”
In
May 1981, Henry Kissinger who had replaced Brzezinski as head of the Trilateral
Commission and had many operatives planted around President Reagan, gave a speech at
Britain’s Chatham House (the controlling handbehind
the Council on Foreign
Relations) where he described his work as Secretary of State saying
that the British “became
a participant in internal American deliberations, to a degree probably never
practiced between sovereign nations… In my White House incarnation then, I kept
the British Foreign Office better informed and more closely engaged than I did
the American State Department… It was symptomatic”. In his
speech, Kissinger outlined the battle between Churchill vs FDR during WWII and
made the point that he favored the Churchill worldview for the post war world
(And ironically also that of Prince Metternich who ran the Congress of Vienna
that snuffed out democratic movements across Europe in 1815).
In
June 1982, Reagan’s Westminster Palace speech officially
inaugurated the NED and by November 1983, the National Endowment for Democracy
Act was passed bringing this new covert organization into reality with $31
million of funding under four subsidiary organizations (AFL-CIO Free Trade
Union Institute, The US Chamber of Commerce’s Center for International Private
Enterprise, the International Republican Institute and the International
Democratic Institute) (2).
Throughout
the 1980s, this organization went to work managing Iran-Contra, destabilizing
Soviet states and unleashing the first “official” modern color revolution in
the form of the Yellow revolution that ousted Philippine president Ferdinand
Marcos. Speaking more candidly than usual, NED President David Ignatius said in 1991 “a lot of what we do today was done
covertly 25 years ago by the CIA”.
With
the collapse of the Soviet Union, the NED was instrumental in bringing former
Warsaw Pact nations into NATO/WTO system and the New World Order was announced
by Bush Sr. and Kissinger- both of whom were rewarded with knighthoods for
their service to the Crown in 1992 and 1995 respectively.
Of
course, the vast web of NGOs permeating the geopolitical terrain can only be
effective as long as no one says the truth and “names the game”. The very act
of calling out their nefarious motives renders them impotent and this simple
fact has made the recently announced China-Russia
arrangement to formulate a proper strategic response to color
revolutions so important in the current fight.
___________________________
(1)
Undoubtedly President Trump’s gutting of NED funding by
two thirds in 2018 only re-enforced Soros’ accusations that Putin is
the guiding hand in America while pouring millions into anti-Trump regime
change operations in America. While neocons such as Bolton, Pompeo and Senate
leader Mitch McConnell have taken a hardline stance against China in support of
the color revolution, it should be noted that Trump has continuously taken an
opposite line Tweeting on August 14 that “China is not our problem” and that
“the problem is with the FED”.
(2)
At the beginning of 1984, a similar re-organization had occurred in Canada under
the guidance of Privy Council Clerk/Trilateral Commission member Michael
Pitfield who created CSIS when the RCMP’s “dirty operations” during the FLQ
crisis were made known in a series of newspaper reports.
