This so-called ‘All Families are Equal Act’ is really about
destroying all families. This is a first huge step toward regulating all other
personal relationships.
Nobody has a
mother or a father, according to a certain Bill 28
recently passed in the legislature of Ontario, Canada. Got that? The law’s
official title is: “An Act to amend the Children’s Law Reform Act, the Vital
Statistics Act and various other Acts respecting parentage and related
registrations.”
Basically, the law scrubs the words
“mother” and “father” from documents, and replaces them with the neutered term
“parent.” The law also raises the number of legal parents to as many as four
per child. In other words, the government of Ontario will cease to legally
recognize the natural origins of any of its citizens.
If you live in Ontario, you now have no
right for the state to recognize you as either a mother or a father to your
child, biological or otherwise. Likewise, no child there has the right to a
legally recognized biological mother or father. Recognizing the relationship is
now the sole prerogative of the state.
As with all bad legislation that cannot
survive any real scrutiny, proponents of Bill 28 pushed it through fast and
furiously and with a good deal of subterfuge and manipulation. Ontario
Progressive Conservative Party Leader Patrick Brown is reported to have pressured members
to either vote for the bill or stay away from the session. Many who
would have been inclined to vote against it were not present at the vote.
All 79 members who were present voted for
it unanimously. Machinelike unanimity for something so wildly weird speaks
volumes about the utter saturation of political correctness in Canadian society
today. Of course Bill 28 was all packaged up in a sanctimonious fig leaf that
goes by the Orwellian name: “All Families are Equal Act.” Yet “All Children Are
Chattel Act” is a more accurate name for this law.
The State Owns the Children and Dispenses
as It Pleases
Such laws are the handiwork of hardcore
social engineers. Anyone else should know instinctively that something is truly
amiss with a law that prohibits legal recognition of mothers and fathers. Some
people who should know better might try to reassure with a wave of the hand and
quip: “Aw, those zany Canadians! What’ll they come up with next?” A favorite
narrative is that the sky is not falling.
Here’s the problem with that casual take:
Reality has a habit of rearing its head in most unpleasant ways when the gig is up.
This act by the Ontario legislature is just such a gig. It is built upon a
dangerous illusion, and comes with an expiration date, at which point its
social botulism blooms profusely in the gut of the body politic. It will spawn
itself in a legislature near you if you don’t try to stop it.
The damage is already here, particularly
because this law commodifies
children in the starkest way yet. Casual acceptance of abortion was
one giant leap towards the children-as-chattel road we are now on. Abortion
puts children on notice that society does not recognize their right to exist
unless and until given permission to exist. If you don’t think this has bad
psychic consequences for children, you’re not paying attention.
Laws such as Bill 28 put children and their
biological parents on notice that they have no legal right to exist in a family
without special permission from the state. This law lays the groundwork for
legally separating all children from their biological mothers and fathers. Like
it or not, the reality of a biological mother and father is essential to
satisfying the answer to every child’s first transcendental question: “Where
did I come from?”
If we forbid the very words “mother” and
“father” at school, at work, in daily life, we must plead guilty to hacking the
child’s mind and soul. This law essentially tells children to shut up about any
question about their origins. It abusively gags them and prods them to bottle
up their natural curiosity about who they are and where they came from.
Instead, with up to four generic “parents”
recognized by a bureaucratic state, the child is legally a product designed and
manufactured by contractual agreement. No more than that. The biological mother
and father are legally non-existent, and are well on the way to being erased as
parents recognized by default. By erasing mothers and fathers from law, Ontario
has essentially defined parents as interchangeable parts to be torn asunder
from the child at the will of the state. So, obviously, this so-called “All
Families are Equal Act” is really about destroying all families.
Let’s Move to the Big-Picture Fallout
But there’s even more to this on a much
larger scale. As with all such social engineering laws, once you get beyond
their superficial claims—“equality,” “social justice,” and so forth—you can
better see what the heck is going on. I can’t possibly name all of the effects
of this law. But a quick gander down this rabbit hole reveals four very
radioactive effects. The big picture fallout is as follows.
This is mind rape.
Consider this: It is not really the promise of equality that lures most into
accepting such a law. Rather, the expectation of being perceived by
others as a friend and ally of equality serves as the bait. We’ve been socially
conditioned to believe that complying with the equality narrative will keep us
socially unmolested.
Ontarians must pay for this illusion of
safety by submitting to a law that violates their own human identity; i.e., by
being forced in law to reject the fact that each human being exists through the
union of two human beings, one male and one female. That is exactly what a law
forbidding the terms “mother” and “father” does. That amounts to mind rape as
much as any anti-reality law that forces you into a 2+2=5 mindset is mind rape.
I think such edicts are concocted by two
kinds of people: first, those who really do believe the propaganda and insist on
foisting their delusions upon everybody else; and second, those who use this
sort of propaganda as the ticket to control over others. Perhaps the former are
the majority, but the venal latter are the biggest pushers. By sowing confusion
and delusion, and shamelessly manipulating people’s sense of goodwill and fear
of social rejection, activists are messing with minds in much the same manner
as a cult leader or gaslighting wife beater would.
It’s based on manipulative
propaganda. For all practical purposes, we can define propaganda as the
attempt to promote an alternative reality, which empowers the propagandists.
What we have here—in this legislation that attempts to erase the reality of
human existence, identity, and relationships—is pure propaganda. This kind of
rubbish has been cultivated especially over the last 50 years or so through
academia, the media, and Hollywood. It’s been a long haul of programming, much
like cult recruits are programmed in a Pavlovian manner, through conditioning
emotional reflexes that reject independent thinking.
Arguments based on logic and reason are
meaningless to the politically conditioned—people whose fear of being tainted
by political incorrectness is stronger than any thirst for truth. Of course,
facts are meaningless to the ignorant. With years of political correctness
massaged into society, our culture is well-primed for psychological
manipulation. Ontario’s Bill 28 is nothing but the product of such
conditioning.
Separating us from one another
is the ultimate effect. Laws such as Bill 28 are all about
separating people from one another. Every human being, no matter his or her sex
or sexuality or “gender,” has his or her origins in the union of male and
female. This means that there is a relational core, the mother-child-father
bond, to our very existence. These strong families have always been the seeds
of strong communities. By refusing to recognize this bond in law, Ontario is
well on the path to abolishing the
right of biological parents to raise their own children, and
replacing that default right with state licensing of
parents.
This is a first huge step toward regulating
all other personal relationships. Compliance with the politically correct line
through denying the mother-child-father bond, is routinely required in such
scenarios. So separation or the threat of separation from family looms.
Ultimately, that’s a road that takes us into isolation and puts us at the mercy
of the state. How different is this from an effect of slavery, in which the
greatest pain is separation from family members?
The talk of “equality” is a
non-starter when children are treated as chattel. Bill 28
serves to replace the template for our existence—the reality of the male-female
union—with a newly concocted template for existence that allows for artificial
reproductive technologies (ART) to buy and sell
human beings. The desire to procure children through ART may seem
loving, but the practice itself is a road paved with de-humanization. What does “equality” mean, anyway,
in the context of buying and selling children?
In the “All Families are Equal Act,” the
term “equal” is meaningless. It’s a self-refuting absurdity because it does
away with the template for the family, the template for human existence. With
the template legally gone, the family no longer can legally exist.
So “equality” here really means
nothingness. It means no relationships autonomous from the state. It means
“family” as a hash of state-licensed interchangeable parts. It means a monoculture.
So much for “diversity.”
