Modern educators are dismissive of
cursive. Indeed, many are hostile to such a degree that you should
immediately suspect that they are up to something.
Here is an education journalist providing
the Party Line: "Cursive writing is an anachronism. Spending any classroom
time on it is comparable to teaching how to use an abacus: it's interesting as
a history lesson, and probably offers some side benefits, but it is not at all
practical as a day-to-day skill in the modern, connected world."
A professor of education argues: "Cursive should be
allowed to die. In fact, it's already dying, despite having been taught for
decades." (You can depend on education professors to confuse
"decades" with "centuries.")
When you read such swaggering attacks on
cursive, you might assume that the question is settled.
The old geezer is dead, so take him off life support. You rarely
see thoughtful praise of cursive. Even people who are sentimentally
inclined to support cursive can't think of many reasons to do so.
I propose a higher truth: the Education
Establishment is always a reliable guide to what is good. If our
socialist professors rail against X, you know that X is educational gold.
Here are eight reasons why cursive is valuable and we should fight to keep it
in the classroom:
1) LEARN TO READ FASTER. The main
thing is that learning cursive accelerates learning to read. If it did
nothing else, this alone would still make it a huge asset. Cursive
obviously makes a child more aware of letter forms and how words are
spelled. Don
Potter, the phonics guru, states: "Any attempt to educate
American children that neglects the direct development of fluent handwriting is
doomed to fail. The little dribble of handwriting done with the typical phonics
programs is FAR below optimal."
2) HIGHER I.Q. Reading itself has
unexpected benefits. Namely, it makes you smarter. Some researchers speculate that
the brain
rewires itself to become better at reading. K-12 is full
of inferior methods that let children remain poor readers for years.
Their I.Q.s will not advance; their academic skills will not improve.
In contrast, cursive accelerates reading, which will accelerate
everything else.
3) PRECISION. Cursive requires that
young students do something precisely. Not sloppily, not incompletely,
not according to personal whim. Cursive says: This is an M.
Draw it exactly like the diagram. Practice until you can do it correctly.
Penmanship is the perfect path to precision.
Precision is a valuable concept for young
people. They will learn to read faster and think faster, and it will
influence how they approach everything else. When you spell a word, it
needs to be spelled a certain way. Grammar says words must be used in
particular ways.
So much of what they do in public schools
nowadays is a blanket endorsement of sloppiness. Kids can do anything any
way they want. That is not education. That's "academic child abuse."
4) FINE MOTOR SKILLS. Even
detractors of phonics acknowledge that it teaches fine motor skills.
Simply holding a pencil is a big accomplishment for little kids. We
know from the history of carpets that little kids are
capable of extraordinarily delicate work. If children are working
within the context of their family, this work can be largely beneficial.
They learn how to create something really complicated, with lots of
counting required.
But where do kids today get a chance to
perform anything exacting, even for ten minutes? Few children build
models anymore. Videogames require the same actions over and over again.
Cursive demands both physical and mental dexterity.
5) CALLIGRAPHY. This word, which is
almost pure Greek, means beautiful writing. Learning cursive
introduces a child to the world of logos, type design, and graphic design
generally. Children can compare cursive writing to typefaces they see in
the newspaper. They can design their own names in different ways –
each is a logo. Many products have script logos; today's students cannot read
these beautiful names.
6) HISTORY. When children learn
cursive, they can read the Declaration of Independence and many other
historical documents. They can read letters from older relatives.
7) INDIVIDUAL SIGNATURES. Cursive
allows for personal expression. A person's signature is nearly as unique
as a fingerprint. Nowadays, children learn to print their signatures;
these will not be distinctive, probably causing lots of confusion in the legal
system. Probably our collectivist educators like the idea of all people
looking the same and having almost identical signatures. The world will
be more boring.
8) TAKING NOTES. Handwriting is
faster than printing. That was the main reason they developed it.
If students want to take notes in the classroom, cursive is the obvious
choice.
The aforementioned education
journalist specifically squealed: "I shudder to think of the time I spent
learning cursive: 15 minutes of schooling, every day."
Let's think about that.
What, in the typical public school, is accomplished in the entire
day? Almost nothing, judging by literacy and other test scores. But
we're supposed to believe that "almost nothing" reduced by 15 minutes
is a big deal.
Let's turn it around. Apparently, 15
minutes a day is all it takes to learn cursive. Now, that's a bargain,
readily and cheaply available for every child in America. A mere 15
minutes a day will result in higher I.Q., faster and better reading, a greater
appreciation of the aesthetic aspects of type, faster note-taking, one's very
own signature, more coordinated fingers, and the ability to find out what
Thomas Jefferson is famous for. Cursive may be the best deal offered in
K-12 education.
QED: The pattern I see is that our
Education Establishment tends to promote methods that don't work. If you
are engaged in "the
deliberate dumbing down of America," cursive is your natural enemy.
Probably the real reason our experts
condemn cursive is because cursive actually works.
Bruce Deitrick Price explains theories and
methods on his education sites Improve-Education.org.
For info on his four new novels, see his literary site Lit4u.com.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/12/why_the_education_establishment_hates_cursive.html#ixzz4TgKNloOf
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
