Speaking of fake news, the latest issue of
the National Enquirer at the supermarket checkout is giving the mainstream
presstitute media a run for the money: “Castro’s Deathbed Confession: I Killed
JFK. How I framed Oswald.”
That’s almost as good as the fake news
going around the presstitute media, such as the TV stations, the Washington
Post, New York Times, and Guardian—yes, even the former leftwing British
newspaper has joined the ranks of the press prostitutes—that the CIA has
concluded that “Russian operatives covertly interfered in the
election campaign in an attempt to ensure the Republican candidate’s victory.”
If
the CIA is actually stupid enough to believe this, the US is without a
competent intelligence agency. Of course, the CIA didn’t say and doesn’t
believe any such thing. The fake news stories in the presstitute media are all
sourced to unnamed officials. Former British ambassador Craig Murray described
the reports accurately: “bullshit.”
So who is making the stories up, another
anonymous group tied to Hillary such as PropOrNot, the secret, hidden organization
that released a list of 200 websites that are Russian agents?
Fake news is the presstitute’s product.
Throughout the presidential primaries and the presidential campaign, it was
completely clear that the mainstream print and TV media were producing endless
fake news designed to damage Trump and to boost Hillary. We all saw it. We all
lived through it. What is this pretense that Russia is the source of fake news?
We have had nothing but fake news from the
presstitutes since the Klingon regime. Fake news was used against Yugoslavia
and Serbia in order to cloak Clinton’s war crimes.
Fake news was used against Osama bin Laden,
Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia in order to cloak the Bush
regime’s war crimes.
Fake news was used against Libya and Syria
in order to cloak the Obama regime’s war crimes.
Without fake news, these three
blood-drenched presidencies would have been hauled before the War Crimes
Commission, tried, and convicted.
Can anyone produce any truthful statement
from the presstitute media about anything of importance? MH-17? Crimea?
Ukraine?
Ironic, isn’t it, that it is those who
purport to be liberal and progressive who are responsible for the revival of
McCarthyism in America. Moreover, the liberal progressives are
institutionalizing McCarthyism in the US government. There is clearly a
concerted effort being made to define truth as fake news and to define lies as
truth.
Ironic, isn’t it, that it is the war
criminal Hillary, responsible for the destruction of Libya and the near
destruction of Syria until the Russians intervened, that the liberal
progressive forces are desperate to have as president. Not only did the liberal
progressive forces attempt to elect a war criminal president of the US, they
are doing their best to delegitimize the president-elect who opposes the
orchestrated conflict with Russia.
Ironic, isn’t it, that the liberal
progressive bloc refuse to give peace a chance.
The faked news report from the imbeciles at
PropOrNot, which was hyped by the fake news sheet, WaPo, claiming that I was a
Russian agent was supposed to do my credibility harm. Instead, the 200 List
told everyone where they could get good information, and my readership went up.
Moreover, I almost got a Russian passport out of it. But before sending it
along, Putin checked with Russian intelligence and was informed that I am not
on their roster.
The rumor is that if the House intelligence
bill passes with Title V intact, those of us on the PropOrNot list could be
called before congressional hearings in a replay of McCarthyism. If they
waterboard me, I might break down and implicate Ronald Reagan, George H.W.
Bush, Jim Baker, David Stockman, and all the rest. The evidence against us is
pretty strong. Trump is suspect because he wants peace with Russia, and so did
Reagan. From the standpoint of the Hillary forces and the presstitutes, anyone
who wants peace with Russia is bound to be a Russian agent.
The way the presstitutes have framed the issue, there are
no legitimate reasons to be for peace.
If Putin and those of us on the 200 List
are the ones who actually got Trump elected, shouldn’t Putin or The List be
Time magazine’s person of the year and not Trump? After all, if Putin and I did
the work, shouldn’t we get the recognition? Why give the credit to the stooge
we put in office?
Why is Time magazine showing those of us
responsible off into the background?
Eureka! Time magazine is also a Russian
agent and is covering up for us by giving Trump credit for our work. Whew! I
won’t be waterboarded after all.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2016/12/paul-craig-roberts/youre-peace/
